Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Euros Say No to More Afghan Troops

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 06:42 PM
Original message
Euros Say No to More Afghan Troops
Euros Say No to More Afghan Troops
December 01, 2009


France and Germany refused US requests to immediately promise more troops for Afghanistan, frustrating President Barack Obama's hopes that allies would match his troop surge.

Britain has already offered an extra 500 troops and Italy has said it will send an unspecified number but Poland and other contributors are among those waiting to see what happens in Afghanistan.

US officials say Obama is about to announce a surge of 30,000 troops and British Prime Minister Gordon Brown this week predicted other nations would provide another 10,000.

A French minister said Tuesday that President Nicolas Sarkozy had refused a US request for more troops. But Le Monde newspaper quoted a Sarkozy aide as saying that France was weighing the request and could agree to boost its presence as long as the fresh troops focus on training Afghan forces.

http://www.military.com/news/article/euros-say-no-to-more-afghan-troops.html?col=1186032310810&wh=wh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LakeSamish706 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good, there the smart ones... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. I know your name is "Straight Story"....so can you tell me about this mixed newspaper story,
with a headline that says one thing,
but a text that actually implies another, after everything is done?

Thanks.

"But Le Monde newspaper quoted a Sarkozy aide as saying that France was weighing the request and could agree to boost its presence as long as the fresh troops focus on training Afghan forces.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. IMHO it is the context
It is one thing to send troops to fight, another to send people to train others.

Sending people into combat is a lot different than sending them in to teach/train others.

Combat versus education roles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC