Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

You know what bothers me about this escalation?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 04:48 PM
Original message
You know what bothers me about this escalation?
We are eight years late to change the dynamics that have existed in that area of the world for oh at least two millennium.

Yes the WEST, no, not just the US... refused to help change that dynamic back in 1991... and of course after the Taliban fell.

So the US will learn the same lesson Alexander the Great learned.

Two things.

Afghanistan is NOT a nation, but a collection of tribes.

Afghanistan has defeated every invader since oh Alexander...

Oh and Al Qaida... long gone... and this war on terror is a war on a tactic... one we invented in its modern form.

But yes, the dynamics could have been changed, but we are about eight years too late.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R
n/t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. We are throwing good troops at an unwinnable war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's never too late for us taxpayers to GIFT another trillion bucks to the corporations comprising
Edited on Tue Dec-01-09 04:51 PM by ShortnFiery
the Military Industrial Complex.

No, there's TONS of money to be made through DEATH and DESTRUCTION.


FOLLOW THE MONEY! :evilgrin:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. We still have a tainted electronic voting system w proprietary source code, so those in power
are not afraid of their actions. You're correct -follow the money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
5. More like 20 years too late.
We bailed on them before, right after we supported what is now the Taliban in kicking some Soviet ass... then after the Soviets left, we left. We should have stuck around and provided them with infrastructure rebuilding (schools for both boys and girls would have been nice). And some economic opportunity (grow something else besides poppies, or grow poppies and find a different use for them).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. That is 1991
and at heart this is a civil war between urban elites (and tribes too) and rural populations

And yes I am simplifying the living daylights out of this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. You are aware that the government the soviets were backing
provided equal opportunities to women including posts in the government and university educations - and WE supported the people became the generation of drug lords and misogynists.

If we had never interfered in the first place NONE of this would have ever happened, and Afghanistan would be a moderately prosperous democracy today.

The SOVIETS were on the RIGHT SIDE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Of course. That's the irony.
We've switched sides.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ghost Dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. Bingo. And much the same would apply to Iran.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
6. Maybe we'll manage to split Afghanistan along tribal lines, right after some ethnic cleansing.
That'll be the lasting peace solution. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Oh that will happen whether we are there or not
The army is now dominated by the Tajik... and that could be bad news... not that this would be different if ANOTHER tribe was dominant either...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
8. There is a way to win.
It's quite simple. Ask anybody who wants to live to leave. We will provide the buses. Vaporize the land. Done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. You are serious
use nukes....

Well then... shall we just use the 100 that we need to get a nuclear winter going?

I mean that will solve the global weather change problem too.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. Now there's clever thinking!!
We could save a bunch on all this cap and trade bullshit in the process!!

I think you should be president ;)

































oh, and for the terminally reactive, :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
10. Two things
Al Qaida isn't gone.

The entire world is engaged in this conflict... on one side against Al Qaida and the Taliban.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Yes, Al Qaida is across the border
and that was told by General McChrystal oh in March.

And NATO is NOT the entire world.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. The entire world:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. Your graph is wrong
The NATO force, ISAF has over 75,000 troops in Afghanistan, of which only 30 thousand are US.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Link?
BBC is the source on that chart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 03:42 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. From the NATO itself
Edited on Wed Dec-02-09 03:43 AM by berni_mccoy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
13. bu$h* fucked it up beyond just pulling out the troops.it'll be Obama's war now, but that's the truth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chulanowa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. Bush who?
We're democrats, we don't know who this "Bush" is you speak of! Obama started this war, and he's making it worse now! We should all start voting Nader!

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
22. Oh for fuck's sake.
1. Alexander the fucking Great fucking CONQUERED what's now modern Afghanistan. Hellenism endured there for hundreds of years after his death. Sure, 19th Britain failed. The Soviets failed. Alexander the Great didn't. Not that an analogy between a modern army and a 300 fucking BCE would ever apply anyway.

2. Afghanistan WAS a nation, a good one relatively speaking, and can be again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. Of course, the Brits failed because the Tsar was providing arms to
anti-British insurgents and buying the friendship of tribal chiefs. The Brits leaving and the Russian Revolution pretty much ended the messing with Afghanistan and it was a moderately prosperous and stable and even progressive country which the king modeled after post-Ottoman Turkey.

And the Russians failed because WE were providing money and arms to a minority insurgency. Things were relatively easy for them until we started giving anti-aircraft weaponry to the mujahadeen.

But it is the Graveyard of Empires. Everybody knows that.




This stuff is the result of people making decisions based on history classes that were too boring to stay awake through.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #22
26. LOL at going back to Alexander the Great (356–323 BC) to justify nation building in 2009!
Well played!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Is that how you read that?
Shame about all that wasted community college tuition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
25. I think the idea that "the WEST" can give a group of stone age tribes a civil society
smacks of more than a little "white man's burden". :shrug:

Take up the White Man's burden--
Send forth the best ye breed--
Go bind your sons to exile
To serve your captives' need;
To wait in heavy harness,
On fluttered folk and wild--
Your new-caught, sullen peoples,
Half-devil and half-child.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC