Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama's New Afghanistan Plan May Be Much Like Old One

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 09:07 PM
Original message
Obama's New Afghanistan Plan May Be Much Like Old One
Source: Christian Science Monitor

Washington - The Afghanistan war plan President Obama will announce next week won't stray far from the strategy he laid out eight months ago, say experts.

After nine meetings with his war council – and reports of vigorous disagreement within the administration – Mr. Obama seems likely to stick to the strategy he announced in March, perhaps incorporating elements from other proposals.


His top general in Afghanistan favors a "counterinsurgency" approach that would entail a massive increase in the number of US troops there. Others such as Vice President Biden reportedly prefer a "counter-terrorism" policy that would emphasize targeted strikes on terrorist hideouts.

"There will be something in there for everyone," says one official who is close to the deliberations. "Nobody got everything, but everybody got something."

Obama indicated Tuesday that he was not shying away from the fight in Afghanistan. "It is in our strategic interest, in our national security interest, to make sure that Al Qaeda and its extremist allies cannot operate effectively in those areas," Obama said at the White House. "We are going to dismantle and degrade their capabilities and ultimately dismantle and destroy their networks."

Obama's plan is likely to include:

•More forces. Obama is expected to announce an increase of between 30,000 and 40,000 additional forces for Afghanistan on top of the 68,000 already there. Those forces will conduct combat missions as well as training missions to increase the size of the Afghan national security forces. The additional forces, depending on their number, will be used to shore up sparsely-deployed forces around the country or concentrated on populated areas.

•More civilians.

•More Afghan National Security Forces.

•Deals with some Taliban.

•Bigger NATO contribution.

Explanations at link: http://www.csmonitor.com/2009/1125/p02s08-usmi.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Aramchek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. well if the Christian Scientists say it, we can take it as Gospel, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Are you saying CSM is an unreliable source?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I suspect the DUer is trying to shove his/her head...
...a bit further into the sand. It isn't really true until the money is already gone and the body bags are all unloaded!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SIMPLYB1980 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. something in there for everyone
satisfying no one

this seems to be a recurring theme
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Yep. Obama is looking more and more one term-y
Like Bush Sr.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. well, I remember when Clinton looked the same
Edited on Tue Nov-24-09 09:44 PM by Skittles
there's still time but honestly he really needs to get his act together - the clown circus that was/is HCR is embarassing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. HRC or HCR?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. lol
oops; fixed :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
branders seine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
6. you left out more casualties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
8. Nice
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC