Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fundie Nutcase: The purpose of modern sex education is to indoctrinate children into more boinking..

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 03:36 PM
Original message
Fundie Nutcase: The purpose of modern sex education is to indoctrinate children into more boinking..
:crazy:



from the American Family Association, which asserts that sex is only for the purpose of creating fundie spawn, not pleasure:



More sex ed, lies, and modern culture
Marcia Segelstein - Guest Columnist - 11/19/2009 11:00:00 AM


Listen up, parents. The goal of sex education is not to prevent unwanted pregnancies and diseases. The goal is to promote sexual freedom.

That may sound outrageous, but it's the premise of Dr. Miriam Grossman's new book, You're Teaching My Child What?, and it's backed up by plenty of cold, hard facts. Here's what she writes in the introduction: "From a review of many of today's sex ed curricula and websites, it would appear that a 'sexually healthy' individual is one who has been 'desensitized,' who is without any sense of embarrassment or shame (what some might consider 'modesty'), whose sexuality is always 'positive' and 'open,' who respects and accepts 'diverse' lifestyles, and who practices 'safer sex' with every 'partner.' This is not about health, folks. This is about indoctrination."

While modern sex educators are busy introducing "diverse" sexual lifestyles to their students, what they are not doing is looking out for their health. Dr. Grossman asks the logical question: "Why don't sex educators emphasize that casual sex and multiple partners is a health hazard?" Why don't they make it clear that engaging in sexual behavior with someone means risking exposure to the bacteria, viruses, and full-blown sexually transmitted diseases of each and every one of his or her previous partners.

Condoms are like a magic wand in the world of sex education. Students hear endlessly about practicing "safer sex" by using condoms. But Grossman points out what many aren't told: that most teenagers don't use condoms correctly and, she writes, "Even with proper use, both pregnancy and infection can occur." So students are, in effect, encouraged to take a calculated risk, a risk with enormous ramifications.

In my last column, I wrote about SIECUS, the Sex Information and Education Council of the U.S., and the provider of sex ed curricula to schools from coast to coast. Without any basis in scientific fact, sex ed materials produced by SIECUS promote the idea that it is "healthy" for kids to explore their sexuality. "That," writes Grossman, "was never true, and it's surely not true now, with genital bacteria and viruses infecting another young person every 3.5 seconds." Sexually transmitted diseases are epidemic: one in four teenage girls has one. ........(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.onenewsnow.com/Perspectives/Default.aspx?id=776070




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DearAbby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. They would never think otherwise...
:smacksforehead::rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. Do they even think at all?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. Same thing with driver's education
Just encourages kids to get into rollovers, t-bone collisions and head-on mutilatory accidents! Just put 'em behind the wheel when they're 21. They'll magically know everything there is to know about driving.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. Marcia... Marcia... Marcia
people are going to have sex. It doesn't matter if you teach them that is nasty. Why? Because people like it. So the best thing to do is educate them in regards to practicing it safely.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. And Marcia
who invented sex and made it so, so good?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. AFA is headquartered in Mississippi
an extremely red state awash in conservative "values." The state is number one in teen pregnancy, high school drop out rate and obesity. A story this week indicated the STD's are on the upswing in the state. By Gawd what we need Marcia is more abstinence training to keep the kids stupid. Just how you bible thumpers want them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
5. so...when god told them to 'be fruitful and multiply', did he mean for them to become gay mathletes?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcane1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
7. "most teenagers don't use condoms correctly"
Silly me, I thought that was what sex-ed was FOR!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
8. Actually
It teaches kids that it is ok to reject unwanted sexual advances.
Especially from adults directed at kids.

Just like I rejected Ms. Palin a time or two.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
9. Then they should go back to early seventies sex education.
Pictures of genitalia covered with sores... pregnant girls puking on the beach... giving birth to a baby in a fallout shelter. No moralizing, and someone informative. Takes the glamour out of boinking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nemo137 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. They still do the first two.
Part of the standard abstinence only sex-ed curriculum as of 2003.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
12. The stupid, it BURNS!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC