Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Salon.com: Obama camp was source for Edwards haircut story

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Teramis Donating Member (25 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 07:27 PM
Original message
Salon.com: Obama camp was source for Edwards haircut story
Source: Salon.com

"It's easy to get caught up in the distractions and the silliness and the tit-for-tat that consumes our politics; the bickering that none of us are immune to, and that trivializes the profound issues -- two wars, an economy in recession, a planet in peril," then-Sen. Barack Obama said last April, on the night he lost Pennsylvania's Democratic presidential primary to Hillary Clinton.

That sort of thing has been a consistent theme from Obama, both on the trail and while he's been in the White House, the message being that people should stop focusing on the small, silly things that characterize so much of politics, preventing actual substance from being part of the discussion.

In some ways, Obama and his team have tried to live up to that. In others, well, they're just as guilty as everyone else.

One of the sillier, more trivial stories from the presidential campaign, and perhaps the one that got people on the left most consistently riled, was what started out as a pretty short blog post by Politico's Ben Smith, who reported that John Edwards had been getting $400 haircuts. Though other scandals have since overshadowed memories of Edwards' 2008 campaign, it was a big deal at the time, and it stuck around for quite a while.

Read more: http://salon.com/news/john_edwards/index.html?story=/politics/war_room/2009/11/10/edwards_haircut
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dr Robert Donating Member (381 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. a haircut was the least of Edwards' problems. no doubt the Obama team knew a whole lot more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Juche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #1
133. I wonder if that is why Kucinich hated Edwards so much
You could tell in the debates Kucinich didn't like Edwards. I wonder if his affair played a role. I assume part of it was he probably considered Edwards a phony progressive (ie an ex-member of the DLC who voted for corporate bills in the past who had a come to jesus moment on poverty around 2004ish).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 02:21 AM
Response to Reply #133
137. Possibly because he liked him so much before, and probably because Edwards tried to exclude him
When Kucinich was a guest on The Daily Show in '03, Stewart asked him who he liked out of the other candidates. Kucinich said he liked them all, but warmly singled out John Edwards.

In the '07 run-up, Edwards tried at one point to reduce one of the debates to just the three front-runners, which didn't sit well with Kucinich.

Amid all the furore and need to slag John Edwards of late, we should remember that his '03-'04 campaign was firmly grounded on a populist and economic platform. His stump speech of the time focused on how the Republican shift of the tax burden from wealth to wages was inherently wrong. Although I'm sure he didn't coin the phrase, his use of it was the first time I ever heard the term "economic populism".

It would be interesting to hear what Kucinich feels about Edwards at the moment, but once upon a time, he was the one he felt closest to.

Lest we forget, and despite claims to the contrary on this board, Edwards was the one who really latched on to the health care issue. I'm not the only one who thinks that the ascendancy of that issue was largely brought on by him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. Anything that would sink his campaign is fine by be
Does anybody here understand how catastrophic it would have been to have Edwards as the nominee and then have the adultery story come out right in the summer before the election?

Vice President Palin would find it hilarious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. No joke.
If a haircut is what kicked it off to kill early momentum, then I am all the more grateful. Elizabeth was spared a HUGE amount of publicity that she didn't need. Not to mention the kids.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. What BS. Look at all the stories that came out about Pres. Clinton.
while he was running for president. Almost ALL of our presidents had mistresses or affairs.And all of them ran on some version of family values.Things are as bad as well "allow" them to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #12
49. But this one seems to be validated
Would you have liked that to have come out in the middle of the campaign? Would you have enjoyed living under President McCain and Vice President Palin?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #49
59. That diversion never gets old. You win a red herring. Congratulations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #59
113. +1.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissDeeds Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #12
55. Clinton had his haircut issues too
He tied up a major airport for a couple hours while Air Force One sat on the runway so he could get a $200 haircut, and he had issues of infidelity during his presidency. Yet many here, myself included, would say he was a pretty good president. That doesn't make any of his moral failings right, but all things considered, I am still glad he was president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #55
68. And the lie lives on.
The story was that planes were kept circling as President Bill Clinton had his hair clipped on Air Force One at Los Angeles airport last month.

The runway haircut by Beverly Hills stylist Cristophe became such a metaphor for perceived White House arrogance that the president himself felt compelled to apologize for the reported flight delays.

But the reports were wrong.

According to Federal Aviation Administration records obtained through the Freedom of Information Act, the May 18 haircut caused no significant delays of regularly scheduled passenger flights - no circling planes, no traffic jams on the runways.

Commuter airlines that fly routes reportedly affected by the president's haircut confirmed they have no record of delays that day.

The FAA records, generated by the regional Air Route Traffic Control Center, show that an unscheduled air taxi flight had the only delay attributed to the closure of two runways for an hour in anticipation of Air Force One's departure. The air taxi took off 17 minutes after leaving the gate -- two minutes late, by FAA accounting.


http://mediamatters.org/research/200702090015#correction
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #68
105. Thank you for setting the record straight
now, if we can find something similar about the Clinton staff "vandalizing" White House keyboards by removing the letter W?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 03:27 AM
Response to Reply #105
111. Sure...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #111
128. Thank you. Unbelievable!
I was at the gym in January and decided to watch Fox. It was about 3:00 PM Eastern and I figured hey, they'll just give the news. But they chuckled about of whether the Bush staff would remove the letter O.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #12
123. Clinton have any kids with a mistress? Was his wife battling cancer?
Context.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
23. what gets me is that you don't hear about Ann Coulter's credibility ...
I mean, she's the one who called him a "faggot", right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #23
30. That is hilarious! Absolutely right! Ann should publicly apologize!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
54. Apparently not
It would have been beyond catastrophic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. Was it a haircut from a "videographer"?...
:evilgrin:

It wasn't just a haircut, which is why the story resonated. It was a symbol of Edward's mentality, and hypocrisy, as he clearly demonstrated which part of the "two americas" he thought he belonged to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. "As guilty as everyone else" - Yep. Water under the bridge, sure. Still, an insight? Hypocritical?
Sleazily done?

Yep.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Yup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. Tough Shite? You BET.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
48. Shows that Obama isn´t a total wimp after all.
Edwards needed to be destroyed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #5
118. Why would anyone be surprised? Axelrod did the exact same thing in 2004 when he was Edwards' guy.
He pushed the image of Edwards as being unwilling to lower himself to engage in the primary battles all the while they were quietly doing exactly that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. And, could be from the ones who defend Edwards' sleazy behavior
to their dying breath.

Talk about hypocricy..and Edwards was full of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Pretty sure the OP didn't write the article.
Edwards sleaze doesn't excuse the behavior of others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Edwards' Sleaze was on a level all it's own and I'm glad
he got exposed early on.

Turns out he couldn't hide anything..not $400.00 haircuts or his sleazy affair..which are his business until he started running for president on his santimonious platform.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Doesn't excuse others' hypocrisy. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. Pine away for Edwards until
Edited on Tue Nov-10-09 08:38 PM by Cha
you're red in face.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. I'm not pining for anyone. Maybe it is your perspective that is clouded by emotion?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Maybe your perspective is clouded by bitterness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #26
32. Cha, some respected Edwards, leave them the fuk alone
Who is the voice for the poor now?

No one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #32
38. .
Edited on Tue Nov-10-09 09:48 PM by Bluebear
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #32
41. Edwards blew his own chance to be a voice for the poor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teramis Donating Member (25 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #41
43. We have to admit though. He had a great health care plan
Krugman liked his plan, and President Obama in fact recently adopted the mandate that Edwards had planned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #43
46. A mandate without competitive public option is a farce
but that's another topic entirely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #43
56. Yeah, so what the fuck was he thinking?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #41
45. And WE lost a voice for the poor. It was a loss for all of us.
Now leave it at that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #45
51. Tell that to fucking Edwards..I'll leave it at THAT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teramis Donating Member (25 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #51
58. Obama supporters gave Edwards a standing ovation when Edwards endorsed Obama
Edited on Tue Nov-10-09 09:40 PM by Teramis
"Edwards, who received a thunderous ovation when Obama introduced him to a crowd of several thousand, said, "brothers and sisters, we must come together as Democrats" to defeat McCain. "We are here tonight because the Democratic voters have made their choice, and so have I.""

He certainly wasn't viewed as a "sleazeball" back then, even though this event happened after the haircut story.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/05/14/politics/main4097243.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #58
60. Yeah, we didn't know about the extra curricular Fucking back then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #60
62. Cha, has someone hurt you like Edwards hurt his family?
Your comments scream entirely too personal to be political.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #62
120. Quit trying to be the board's psychiatrist and stick to facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #120
129. A comment or two does not make me a psychiatrist
Edited on Wed Nov-11-09 11:59 PM by Mithreal
but if I could I would prescribe you for meds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #32
75. codswallop. Littlle Johnny Hedgefund did jackshit for the poor
opportunistic fuckwad. And Bernie has been speaking out for the poor before the opportunistic little shit ever thought of exploiting them for his own ambition. So have others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #75
100. Crawl out of from under a hole for my comment, I am so honored, thank you
I was talking about a President.

So, you do not believe Edwards changed and that he was a snake oil salesman all along? All right, people can say the same about other Democratic leaders and they remain opinions and nothing more without evidence. The people here who kick Edwards and family while they are down, well, go the fuk ahead and carry on, ya bastards. I think it is especially amusing when they say how sad they are for the family while they kick him again and again. I will stand up for any human being being kicked around and I don't just do it in e-land. Cali, if you are an ally leave his family and him alone. You and your cohort got what you wanted, he is done. He has no more political career ever.

However, I agree about Bernie Sanders. The more his voice is heard, the more hopeful I am.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 08:03 AM
Response to Reply #100
112. Yep. I believe Edwards is a phony and never gave a flying fuck about anyone but himself
And who is my cohort, dear?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #112
119. Kicking them when they are down takes real courage
deary ; )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #75
135. Yeah, he is no match for Prez Obama who has orchestrated the greatest wealth transfer from the
poor and middle class to the wealthy via the Wall Street banksters - thanks to Obama's buddies at Treasury and at the SEC.

You need to try harder to match this stuff cali.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #32
124. edwards' support for the poor was a total sham, and the opposite of his voting record.
Edited on Wed Nov-11-09 01:33 PM by dionysus
"ahm at this here hedge fund studyin' pahvetty for mah campayne"
but smoove johnny doesn't matter any more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. it seems impossible for some to understand being motivated by issues and a platform
Edited on Tue Nov-10-09 08:53 PM by saracat
as opposed to slavish dedication to a politician.Nor do they understand that ALL candidates are politicians, including their own. Bill Maher said it best" its not as if he were your boyfriend". Some of us get that, others don't.:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #28
35. I know. Odd. WTF? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #35
37. second that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Autumn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #28
47. Very good,
I never thought Bill or John cheated on me. It wasn't my business. But then I have never seen a politician who was perfect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #20
27. Exactamento!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
7. Sounds like he needed a haircut
Rather than the trim. :O
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLyellowdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. something else shoulda been cut, IMO. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
52. A great, but obscure, reference. Bravo! NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
125. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Puzzler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
10. Isn't the Edwards haircut meme older than the 2008 primaries?
I heard pundits going on about Edwards haircuts in 2004... along with the "Breck Girl" bullshit too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. I thought so, too. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #10
86. Exactly. More lies by desperate Obama haters
Even if true, the Obama camp could have said much, much worse things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hileeopnyn8d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #10
117. I remember it from 2004
It absolutely did not start in 2008. Along with the haircut thing, there was a video of him preening before an event. I remember it like it was yesterday, because some asshole on another board I belonged to, posted it in every single thread that was supportive of Kerry/Edwards.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #10
127. Yep. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mainer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-15-09 07:23 AM
Response to Reply #10
152. Absolutely. No one had heard of Obama then.
I remember "Breck Girl" from the 2004 campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
16. I'm shocked! Shocked! I tell you, that politickin' was goin' on in a campaign!!!
That sort of thing is acceptable only when it's a complete lie, such as what the Shit Bloaters did to John Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teramis Donating Member (25 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
18. I don't recall any price tag being assigned to his haircut pre-08. I do recall the "Breck girl" meme
Edited on Tue Nov-10-09 08:09 PM by Teramis
Which is about his hairstyle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
19. You mean, Obama invited Edwards hairstylist to fly to Edwards and give him a cut?
The guy must be brilliant!

Did anyone know that his team was also responsible for that great commercial
with the 1984 theme against Hillary Clinton?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6h3G-lMZxjo

Glad that we've got a genius running the show. Probably the reason we are closer
to HCR than at any other time before in decades!


But, can't give him all of the credit....
cause I don't think Obama was responsible for Edwards' "I feel Pretty" Video...was he?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
21. and the point is......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sellitman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
22. Yawn
Must be a slow news cycle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #22
57. I'll double that yawn.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #57
66. No doubt, the story is FAR LESS intriguing than the reaction
I have my doubts why someone would even post this story unless it was to divide over nothing and distract.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
29. Was the Dave Matthews Band playing in the background during the haircut? nt
Edited on Tue Nov-10-09 08:55 PM by ClarkUSA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #29
71. ....
:applause:


:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AspenRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #29
131. Bwah!
:spray:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
31. Must be a slow day at Salon.com
Cause who gives a fuck, really?

Really?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
33. Mods, how is this deserving of LBN?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teramis Donating Member (25 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. 1) comes from a respectable source 2) Was posted only a few hours ago 3) reports something new
I would say those are the reasons why.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. As I was saying, DU takes LBN more seriously. Thank you, mods.
I would argue the relevance of your counterpoints but I no longer need to do so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #34
81. True...
But it's also pretty frivolous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
39. It wasn't the haircut that de-railed John Edwards
He did that all by himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #39
42. Brilliant! Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #42
44. Really? That was brilliant? Now I can't take you seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #44
53. I don't care how you take anything..it's only obvious you
have a one track mind and that track is stuck way back when Edwards' infidelity hadn't been exposed yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #53
64. Um, no, I moved on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #53
65. And yours appears to be stuck after the infidelity
Pot, meet kettle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #65
70. I'm not stuck anywhere. I'm living in the present/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 02:49 AM
Response to Reply #70
107. I challenge that belief on your part
You've spent way too much time on this topic. Way too much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #107
122. Sez the net nanny who commands no respect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
40. .
:rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
50. The haircut story was true, lol. So what??
Edwards was egotistical enough to get $400 haircuts and reported them to the FEC. The information was out there so it's not as if any digging needed done. No lies were told.

What a weak-assed story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
61. Good for Obama
Thank God Edwards went down before he got very far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
63. You have got to be kidding me.. how about the 2004 1200 Edwards hair cut on plane
that was all the talk radio hell hounds went on about.. I do not think the Obama campaign was running in 2004 :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teramis Donating Member (25 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #63
67. The $1200 and the $400 story are the same one (different money estimates)
Edited on Tue Nov-10-09 09:51 PM by Teramis
There was no $1200 haircut story in the year 2004.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #67
69. Google can be your friend.. two different stories.. two different campaigns
Edited on Tue Nov-10-09 09:57 PM by Peacetrain
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teramis Donating Member (25 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #69
73. You falsely stated that in 2004, talk radio shows were talking about the $1200 haircut
The 2004 story was not known until Edwards' stylist told the Washington Post about it in 2007

WASHINGTON POST (July, 2007): "Torrenueva said one haircut during the 2004 presidential race cost $1,250 because he traveled to Atlanta and lost two days of work."

From the link you gave me.

Don't you find it intersting that you cannot find any link dated 2004 regarding a $1200 haircut?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #73
74. I was around asshat... I know what happened..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teramis Donating Member (25 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #74
76. Edwards' stylist broke the 2004 haircut news to the Washington Post in July, 2007
Edited on Tue Nov-10-09 10:14 PM by Teramis
"I was around" is no evidence. We go by links here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #76
77. ROFL....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teramis Donating Member (25 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #77
79. Still zero links from 2004. Only a 2007 news report n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
72. How Rovian of them. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #72
80. Actually quite elementary!
now if you want to get into rovelike, just think scouring tapes of Rev. Wright's sermons till you get just the right one, and get people to know how to get folks to believe that whatever your pastor said, you said.

Now, that's some Booga Booga shit there.

A $400 haircut, not so much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #80
83. oh well, the obama admin did it so its okay of course
no matter how low it sinks. even if its Rovian. we cannot criticize the tactics of the great and mighty Obama admin of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #83
87. This is really trivial though, you have to admit, no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #87
88. The OP is sh*t stirring..
:hi:..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #88
95. Sure seems like it.
Hiya right back : )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #87
91. depends. lowclass tactics are lowclass integrity.
imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #91
97. Yeah, I hear ya, but the problem is this wasn't that serious a charge
Now, if they played games with his infidelity, then maybe I would be more open to persuasion but even then, maybe not.

Look who the President picked for Chief of Staff, low class all the way.

Next time a candidate has the press in an uproar about hair, maybe he or she should consider a shave. If the press wants to only talk about your hair, take it all off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #83
92. If I don't respond in kind to this snarky post,
then you'll end up looking super silly without any further comments from me,
with this retort.

So, OK, I'm gonna be quiet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #83
115. You must not understand who Karl Rove is and how he operates. Because "leaking"
a truthful piece of political info that puts ones opponent in an unfavorable light is politics 101 and the most basic strategy.

Karl Rove took an opponents strength and actual facts and then fabricated stories that said the exact opposite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 02:19 AM
Response to Reply #72
106. How's that?
Rove planted SUGGESTIONS of wrongdoing to warp perceptions in people's minds.

Edwards actually DID have these haircuts, and someone found it out.

Then leave it to Politico to have stirred the s%it, pretty much like the OP is doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PopSixSquish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
78. If the Phrase "Whoopty-Fucking-Do" Didn't Already Exist, We Would Have to Invent it For This Story
Edited on Tue Nov-10-09 10:16 PM by PopSixSquish
I was an early Edwards supporter but $400.00 for a haircut?

This is exactly the rinky-dink bullshit stuff that every politician pulls on another candidate and every politician should know better than to give another candidate ammo...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Midwestern Democrat Donating Member (238 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
82. I have always hated this kind of "trivial pursuit" type of politics - I
understand that it's a part of the game and it works (unfortunately) - but I've never liked it. We're certainly lucky that Edwards didn't get the nomination, but I will say that it takes a whole lot of nerve for someone whose campaign cost somewhere in the region of $750,000,000 to make a campaign issue out of a pricey haircut.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #82
94. $750,000,000 to win the Presidency?
Hell, that was a bargain,
considering how fucked we were for 8 years,
and how totally fucked we would continue to be
with McCain running the ship.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
84. From a former Edwards supporter: Who cares?
I'm just glad he didn't win the nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
85. huge
thanks for keeping it real
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
89. um...i'm almost certain that dates back to the '04 race
if someone would bother to search the archives from 2004 i'm sure it would be found...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #89
90. It does.. or at least one of the stories do.. that is the souce of it
a 1200 haircut.. that sent the right wingers nutty and was the source of the Breck girl thingy with Limbaugh.. Can any of us forget that goofy video.

The right has this thing about hair.. they did it to Clinton and Kerry also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teramis Donating Member (25 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #89
93. In 2004, nobody said that Edwards had paid $1200 for a haircut
The first news about this 2004 haircut was reported in 2007, a few months after the $400 haircut broke.
As journalists became interest in the $400 story, they interviewed Edwards' hair stylist, who then disclosed the 2004 amount.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #93
104. even then, i fail to see the story here...
it's not like we'd be saluting president edwards right now if only the whole world didn't know the cost of his haircuts...that's like saying a loose rivet played a role in the sinking of the titanic...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unc70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #93
138. You realize he was/is Kerry's stylist. I noticed something curious in all this
Edited on Fri Nov-13-09 09:48 AM by unc70
Lots of things suggest that the Obama campaign "researchers" knew about this payment well before it was on the FEC site, maybe within a few days of it happening.

The stylist or someone at his salon, and they had sent the bill to the campaign.

Someone in the Edwards campaign is another possibility.

Either answer would suggest that this was a setup.

BTW wasn't it convenient to already have the Obama barber story.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #138
143. AXELROD was Edwards' campaign manager in 2004. BASIC facts are so easily forgotten
around here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unc70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-15-09 06:56 AM
Response to Reply #143
151. Plouffe/OC behind early primary fiasco wrt Clinton FL delegates
Not only did the Obama campaign orchestrate keeping the FL primary non-compliant, they were able to use bloggers (several on this thread) and pundits to blame Clinton and thus justify denying delegates because "she is getting what she deserves". Plouffe confirms.

Now, here is why the haircut story is important: Ben Smith at Politico broke the story on April 16 (after the FEC filings were available). He said that the first campaign haircut payment was Feb 20. Smith then links to his blog about Obama's barber posted Feb 23. Smith had another entry on that day quoting Obama on the plane about getting a haircut when he got back home.

Like many stories during the campaign, these two stories remain confined to the blogs and not worthy enough to be news. Not much from the

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riderinthestorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
96. Meh. Chicago style politics as usual. Whatever it takes to take down an opponent.
Sorry but Obama's advisors are classic Chi-town political apparatchiks. Ignore that at your peril. Rahm, David Axelrod etc. - nursed and grown at the Chicago teat. I know people don't want to think about Obama as having emerged from that machine but he is a true disciple and proven beneficiary.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #96
99. You've joined the Palins/republicans in smearing northern cities
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riderinthestorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #99
101. Yes and because I helped elect Obama, and I'm from the Chicago area, I'm smearing...?
who? exactly?

The Chicago Tribune is OVERFLOWING with stories about Chicago politicians and their wretched shittiness.

I think it's sad that DUers automatically assume anyone who offers critique or insight is some kind of Palin/Rethug troll.

I live here. I love this city. I've been a part of Dem campaigns for decades. You can call my observations "smear", I call it as it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 03:08 AM
Response to Reply #101
108. Shhhh. Some don't believe Obama is a politician. They think he is different.
They don't want their illusion shattered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Azathoth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #96
103. So pointing to evidence that your opponent is a hypocritical fraud is now "Chicago-style politics"?
Most of us would call that "running a competent campaign."

Nice to see that you've got the Limbaugh talking points down. Next time Obama does anything, make a joke about him burying his opponents in concrete -- that should earn you your official Dittohead merit badge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
98. The house story sunk Edwards way more than the haircut story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #98
116. It was indeed a pattern. The McMansion-On-Steriods > Hedgefunds > Expensive Haircuts >
Edited on Wed Nov-11-09 09:08 AM by KittyWampus
pregnant mistress flying around as part of the campaign getting paid for her services.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Azathoth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
102. The haircut story stuck because it fit into a pattern
The house, the hedge fund, the haircuts, etc. Edwards' lifestyle practically screamed "I'm a fraud."

If I had been a campaign staffer for a candidate running against an unctuous, hypocritical huckster like him, I would have been mentioning the haircut story every time I talked to a reporter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 03:19 AM
Response to Original message
109. Thats possible
According to ploufes book there was a point in the campaign where Obama found out people were going negative on his behalf and he clamped down on it pretty hard.

They werent saints ever to be sure but it wasnt and still isnt Obamas MO to run on negative attacks.

People here were screaming for him to fight back so much so that in the primaries the dem leadership and many here were worried he wasnt tough enough to run a general election campaign.

How quickly people forget.

Aside from that I am all for anything that brought that snake oil salesman Edwards down. After watching him campaign in 04 and then watching him reinvent himself in 08 i was amazed anyone at all fell for his charade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 03:25 AM
Response to Original message
110. But this is from David Ptouffle's new book. He is the one writing about it!
Not that it matters. It seems some think this is a slam. It is a campaign memoir.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #110
134. I for one don't think it's a slam at all.
And you're right - it doesn't matter.

This isn't falsified information, you know, like making up a heroic sniper fire dodge. The guy got the haircuts, and in the scheme of things, did a lot more that everyone here knows damned well would have sunk him and the Dems had he gone further than he did.

So yeah. The Obama team knows how to find facts. And?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itsrobert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
114. Obama is just another Politician
Anyone surprised? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #114
126. John Edwards didn't want his haircuts exposed? Then
he shouldn't have had them.

John Edwards didn't want his sleazeball affair exposed? Then he should have stayed true to his wife.

John Edwards shouldn't have put his country at risk but he did.

Good for the Obama campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
121. THANK GOD THEY DID!!!
Could you imagine having Sarah Palin a heartbeat away from the presidency, because McCain would've trounced Edwards after his philandering on a wife who was dying of breast cancer hit the light of day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
budkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 12:01 AM
Response to Original message
130. Fuck Edwards.
It embarrasses me to have supported that douchebag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 12:35 AM
Response to Original message
132. You mean a campaign highlighted a bad story about another campaign?
No way!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 01:13 AM
Response to Original message
136. Par for the course.
Axelrod, Plouffe, et al. did the dirty work and Obama pretended to be above the fray. Hope and change indeed.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #136
139. Succeeded in beating your ass, though
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #139
141. My "ass" wasn't running for anyhting.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #141
142. LOL
Oh, you want the Queen's English? I admire Obama's campaign team for having defeated *your* candidate, who began the primary season as the inevitable Democratic candidate, but was given poor advice by her nasty little set of advisors, and ended up losing the primary to the obviously more deft Obama team.

:rofl:

It's also a damn good thing that they sank the dishonest Edwards before he made a mess of the general election, don't you think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #142
144. Obama's campaign was just as "nasty".
Only difference is that they did their dirty dealings under the table, Chicago style. Regardless, more registered Democrats still voted for Hillary than voted for Obama. Well, it's water under the bridge, he's what we got for now.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #144
145. The only difference is that they won
And your candidate LOST.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #145
146. Sometimes you lose by winning.
Edited on Fri Nov-13-09 11:47 AM by Beacool
Particularly given the state of the country.......

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #146
147. ROFL
Whatever makes you feel better...

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #147
148. Honey, I'm fine.
I'm personally OK regardless of who is president. Unfortunately, other people are not so lucky.

:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #148
149. Sure you are
In any case, I'm glad the best person for the job won out.

:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #149
150. That's a matter of opinion...........
Bye, got too much work.

:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PVnRT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
140. What the fuck is the point of this?
1) It was a stupid fucking story to begin with.
2) Edwards is a non-entity now.
3) This serves no other purpose other than to allow the rabid anti-Edwards people to scream and shout, and the people who are determined to keep fighting the primaries to scream and shout right back.
4) Aren't there more important things to be worried about.

Proud unrec.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC