Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The T-bagger’s idea of a tea party!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-06-09 12:03 AM
Original message
The T-bagger’s idea of a tea party!
Teabagging



You Mean Tea Doesn’t Come from Teabags?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-06-09 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. It's also hilarious that THE original Tea Party was a response to a TAX CUT
on certain teas, East India Company teas I assume, that competed with other teas that were bought, sold, and traded amongst the tea shops that constituted a significant portion of early Colonial small businesses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-06-09 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Well, not really
Edited on Fri Nov-06-09 12:33 AM by Warpy
England back in those days was extremely protectionist. All products from new world manufacturing or trade were heavily taxed to keep jobs in England, thereby making it impossible for business people and traders to make much of a profit in the new world. Merchants could sell English goods at a reasonable price or colonial goods at a hugely inflated price because of the taxes, discouraging anyone from producing goods or importing things independently of the English corporations.

Since the system was strangling the colonies, they rebelled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-06-09 08:13 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. So the English were selling their tea at a lower tax rate or at a lower price?
Edited on Fri Nov-06-09 08:17 AM by patrice
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-06-09 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. At the time of the tea party, both
Smuggled tea was escaping the high duty, so they dropped their own tea tax to undercut the smugglers and bankrupt them.

The whole point wasn't TEA, it was that every single enterprise in the New World was being crippled by English protectionism.

The tea was just the last straw.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rationalcalgarian Donating Member (140 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-06-09 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Wish I knew more about this, but
another explanation for the tax cut on tea is that it was an attempt to stem the import of smuggled tea. By lowering and almost eliminating the tax on tea, the British government hoped to cripple the smuggled tea economy and maintain its own monopoly. The smugglers, led by John Hancock, stood to lose the equivalent of today's millions as they could not compete with the new, cheap price of English tea so, by disguising themselves as native Indians, boarding three English ships in Boston Harbor and destroying several tons of tea and looting and burning a few warehouses along the way, they essentially eliminated the English stock. Colonists had no choice, afterwards, than to buy from the smugglers. With the help of the master propagandist Sam Adams, the smuggler cartel was able to stir up enough fear and ill-will amongst the colonists toward the English that they joined with the smugglers to boycott whatever remained of the English tea supply and, in a fit of patriotism, purchased only "American" tea, even though it was more expensive.
The parallel to today's "Teabaggers" is noteworthy: frightened, uninformed and easily manipulated people protesting with blind, almost pathological fury against something that, if they thought about it, would actually be a good thing for them.

Like I said at the outset, I wish I knew more about this. This is but one of the interpretations I've come across.

I'm a coffee guy, anyway. :donut:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC