Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So what state has voters that will uphold a same sex marriage law

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 10:30 AM
Original message
So what state has voters that will uphold a same sex marriage law
and why don't we try to get something on the ballot next time around just so SOMEBODY passes a law that is supported by a majority of voters?


That way the next state to vote on the issue does not need to be the first one to uphold a law.



We need to stop batting .000 !



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Craftsman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. None
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. Wrong. The majority of Vermonters support marriage equality
There will be no punishment of the legislators that voted for it- and voted to overturn the gov's veto.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLAprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
2. MA and VT, maybe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pipi_k Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #2
14. I'm not so sure about MA
even though gay marriage has been legal here for a number of years and nobody's been damaged by it, the sky hasn't fallen, and the state hasn't caught fire and burned to a crisp in the pits of Hell.

Unfortunately, I think there are still enough people here who would, if given the chance, vote against it and end up changing the law.

Sad. Very sad.

:(

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
3. I think the results of SSM voter approval would be more
positive if it were held in a Prez election year. The media is talking about the low voter turnout yesterday & I just read a report on the election results of the Atlanta Mayoral race. Voting here was EXTREMELY LOW...only 20%! The voters who turn out in off years elections are traditionally seniors and those who are energized by some idiological ballot issue. Those two groups are NOT GBLT friendly!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. Low turn-out WASN'T an issue in Maine; turn-out was high.
It was just all the wrong people.

Tesha

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #9
17. Actually the RW uses wedge issues to push wing nuts emotional buttons to drive them out to vote in
elections like this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. Absolutely! That's what I meant when I said only seniors &
those with an idiologial issue bother to vote in off-year elections! There aren't enough moderates to offset their votes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
4. if a lot of gay peiople moved to wyoming or north dakota...
they could probably eventually get it done in one of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
5. Been tried in 31 so far (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gatorboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
6. Howzabout we just skip the voting thing.
Edited on Wed Nov-04-09 11:04 AM by gatorboy
And go straight to the Supreme Court. You realize how far behind we would be on on other civil rights still if we had put it to a popular vote?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iggo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
7. All.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #7
20. ??? Really????Then why can't we win an election???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TommyO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
10. We need to stop thinking that it's OK to vote on the civil rights of any group of people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
11. I always thought it would be either CA or MA or NY. I just don't like the idea that civil rights
are up to voters! We need the courts to rule that these laws are unconstitutional.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
12. Equal protection shouldn't be subject to anyone's approval. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
haele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
13. It's a mixture of "off years" and big money social-engineering institutions that call themselves
Edited on Wed Nov-04-09 10:50 AM by haele
churches that cause the most grief. (California's Prop 8 was the off-year exception) Before the bought media blitz gets going, the average state polls just above 50/50 in favor of same gender adult marriage, with more states swinging towards full acceptance of it than the ones that are primarily against it.
The media blitzes, outside money, and the cowing of parishioners is what makes a change - too many people thinking "well, if my pastor is against it" - and too many pastors are either too lazy to think about actual local implications to families or are schills that are too greedy for praise and support from their national leadership to not make a hate or fear-filled sermon and hand out the fliers.
It's social engineering from the top of most of these so-called "religious" institutions; the political arm of these institutions that does not care about the original premise of gathering together for good works, comforting the flock, and other acts to bring about community well-being - but about the fund-raising and the outward trappings of local power - and crowd control. It feels good to them to gather together their parishes and create a "army of God" that will show the power of their translation of the Bible to those other pagans, heretics, apostates, and unbelievers that either go to the other places of worship or are secular humanists and atheists.

It's all a game to those in charge - they believe in a God that takes sides and rewards those who "pray harder". Their hearts are no longer in their calling, or they wouldn't be advocating so strongly on the social issues that get less mention in their bibles than, say, helping the poor, under-employed, and uneducated, and otherwise building healthy communities and a healthy world. Oh, and very little against coveting thy neighbors possessions or wishing harm on your neighbor because you're jealous or feel "dis-respected". Those two rules seem to be bigger no-no's than personal consensual actions, yet those are the ones that are ignored with many of these guys.

Haele
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tonysam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
15. None
and probably never in this country. Younger people tend to be liberal on this issue, but after they have kids and more of them become religious, it's not likely they will remain so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
16. People's rights should never be subject to an election.
We need a SCOTUS decision to that effect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Manifestor_of_Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
19. court challenges will overrule referenda.
Gay marriage will be legal in all states and DC eventually due to the Full Faith and Credit Clause, and 14th Amendment equal protection and due process.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. eventually...... that is the problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tnlefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. Perhaps you could help me to understand this, as I haven't been
able to for over a decade. I know that women didn't have the right to vote, I understand Jim Crow, etc., but what I've never been able to understand is:

We have the Constitution and The Bill of Rights, so how do we have two-tiered rights for citizens of this country? I've never been able to completely understand this, and I sure don't understand why this is the situation for GLBT citizens today. I suppose if I could understand the premise then my head wouldn't damned near explode every time that I think about it.

I suppose that I'm just stuck in thinking that a citizen of this country is a citizen of this country and as such everyone has the same rights, or should have anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
21. A state without Catholics
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
24. perhaps California
They are trying to get a prop on the ballot to overturn the overturn to the overturn... The general thought is the poll numbers have actually been trending for gay marriage. While it's not in the majority of the voting public yet. The trends suggest eventually conservatives are going to dislike the idea of civil rights being allowed to be put for popular vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
25. What courts will judge the haters' case on merits?
The clear unconstitutionality of such measures needs test cases.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC