|
I understand some people on this website will not be happy with my making this statement, but it stems from my feeling that anyone who goes to work should get paid to work. I do not completely dislike the idea that Lewis will not get paid for 2009, but I do think he should be paid for working. I also understand that ken Lewis is not really losing anything in that he will leave Bank Of America with a very large sum of money. In addition, I understand the argument that if the government had not bailed out Bank Of America and other companies the CEOs of these companies might not have jobs today so they might not have had salaries.
However, the government chose to bail out these companies and the government chose not to fire the CEOs. As a result, as long as these individuals go to work they should get paid. I think the government and/or the pay czar should have done one of three things. First, try to force the stock holders or Bank of America corporate board to fire Lewis. Second, prevent Lewis from getting a bonus. Third, come up with a payment level that reflected that Lewis' company was doing well at least partly due to government money. I know some will say that payment plan would be to not pay Lewis. If that is the case then they should have just fired him. Since he was allowed to keep his job and he did some form of work he should have at least been paid minimum wage.
|