Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Opium is the perfect solution.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Shanti Mama Donating Member (625 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 08:35 AM
Original message
Opium is the perfect solution.
Why doesn't the US government buy up the entire crop of Afghan opium?

I think this would cost about $8billion, a minuscule fraction of the costs of war without even considering LIVES. If we could buy directly from Afghan farmers it would cost even less. The Taliban would not be able to extort or in any other way profit from the crop and would be significantly weakened financially. Then our fighting forces could just leave and let the country begin to sort itself out. Perhaps those US forces working in development could stay; with the Taliban underfunded and less able to attract/retain members maybe we could tidy up some of the deadly chaos we created.

This move could even be spun for the "other" crowd. We'd be taking the opium out of the market rather than letting it find its way to US streets. Of course, neighbors to our south would do their best to fill the void, but that's another story.

What would we do with our national cache?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ret5hd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. You don't think the CIA would object to ending their cash cow?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
the other one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
2. A cynic might argue
That we are in Afghanistan to make it easier to get the drugs home so as to provide a reason to fight the war on drugs even harder. More drugs on the street means more need for cops and prisons, things in line with goals of many who also support escalation. A cynic might say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattvermont Donating Member (428 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. a realist might say the same nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democracyinkind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. It's not just cynics who say that. Anyone who has studied the dealings of Far West Ltd. kinda thinks
Edited on Tue Oct-13-09 08:53 AM by Democracyinkind
the same things...

It's the Black Masonic Club reloaded with a bit of Iran-Contra MO thrown in for good measure.

Whose war is this? Who is the Afghan connection.? Two questions america needs to ask and get answered ASAP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #2
13. And an even more cynical person might even believe
that since drugs are often found in the inner cities (think black) that a substantial portion of possible Democratic voters can either be sidelined by drug usage or felony conviction... I am almost certain that was the logic behind the creation of Crack plus the funding could support the dirty little Contra War........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
5. Before we invaded, their opium crop was nil...the Taliban
wouldn't allow farmers to plant poppies. After invasion, with the Taliban gone, poppy fields bloomed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democracyinkind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. That's only partly true.
Edited on Tue Oct-13-09 10:04 AM by Democracyinkind
Indeed, they did outlaw poppies in some parts, but whether that was theologically motivated or just some kind of market reorganization is up for dispute. Gulbudin Hekmatyar certainly never stopped planting, dealing and wheeling, and that goes for most of the Taliban-associated warlords too. Also, in 2001 the Taliban-gov still claimed a significant income from foreign trade and no one has ever figured out how that would have been possible without considering opium revenue. I don't know the exact numbers but I can dig them up- the definitive statement that the Taliban and opium are mutually exclusive defies reality, as documented in many books (lately seeds of terror, earlier Scott et al.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guitar man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
6. Great idea
And we give all the opium we buy to Rush Limbaugh, he ODs and then we have solved two problems for a relative bargain, :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shanti Mama Donating Member (625 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. Any you've hit the jackpot!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guitar man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. :)
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northernlights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
8. we could use it to make morphine nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
9. We've failed at the Drug War in the US. What in the world makes us think we can win one there?
And furthermore, by what right does the US claim to be the world's drug cop? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lochloosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
14. The DEA would never allow it. It sends "The Wrong Message"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC