Vagina Exposed On 'So You Think You Can Dance' (NSFW VIDEO) Fox TV

[Ian David]

Vagina Exposed On 'So You Think You Can Dance' (NSFW VIDEO)

On the tails of the weekend's accidental F-bomb on late-night television comes a fully exposed vagina during prime time.

This contestant on Fox's 'So You Think You Can Dance' was so excited by her critique that she fell to the floor and spread her legs wide to reveal she wasn't wearing any underwear. In case you missed it, the moment is captured here in slow motion.

Meanwhile, TMZ has obtained the following statement from Fox: "It is a crease in the young lady's panties." What do you think?


Read more at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/30/vagina-exposed-on-so-you_n_304592.html




Regulation of Obscenity, Indecency and Profanity
It is a violation of federal law to air obscene programming at any time. It is also a violation of federal law to broadcast indecent or profane programming during certain hours. (See definitions}. Congress has given the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) the responsibility for administratively enforcing the law that governs these types of broadcasts. The FCC has authority to issue civil monetary penalties, revoke a license or deny a renewal application. In addition, violators of the law, if convicted in a federal district court, are subject to criminal fines and/or imprisonment for not more than two years.

The FCC vigorously enforces this law where we find violations. In 2004 alone, the FCC took action in 12 cases, involving hundreds of thousands of complaints, assessing penalties and voluntary payments totaling approximately $8,000,000. The Commission has also toughened its enforcement penalties by proposing monetary penalties based on each indecent utterance in a broadcast, rather than proposing a single monetary penalty for the entire broadcast.

At the same time, however, the Commission is careful of First Amendment protections and the prohibitions on censorship and interference with broadcasters' freedom of speech. The FCC has denied complaints in cases in which we determined the broadcast was not indecent based on the overall context of the programming. Regardless of the outcome, the FCC strives to address every complaint within 9 months of its receipt.



How to File a Complaint


Complaints may be filed via:

* Electronic Complaint Form for Broadcast (TV and Radio), Cable and Satellite Issues
* U.S. Mail sent to:

FCC
Enforcement Bureau, Investigations and Hearings Division
445 12th Street, S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20554

* Electronic Mail at [email protected]
* Toll Free: 1-888-CALL-FCC (1-888-225-5322); 1-888-TELL-FCC (1-888-835-5322) TTY
* Fax: [phone]



You can help us resolve your complaint more quickly by providing as much of the following information as possible: (1) the date and time the material was aired; (2) the call sign, channel, or frequency of the station; (3) the city and state where the program was viewed; and (4) as many details as possible about the content of the broadcast to help the FCC determine whether the material was obscene, profane, or indecent. You may support your allegations by a full or partial tape or transcript, or by providing a significant excerpt, but these are not required. The key is to provide enough information for staff to determine both the specific content of the complained-of material and the context in which it was broadcast. It is also helpful to include your address, e-mail and phone numbers.

If you choose to submit a recording, you should send the recording to Federal Communications Commission, Investigations & Hearings Division/Enforcement Bureau, 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capital Heights, MD 20743. Any documentation of the programming becomes part of the Commission's records and cannot be returned.

More:
http://www.fcc.gov/eb/oip/Compl.html

[Name removed]

1. Deleted sub-thread

Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[MNDemNY]

2. Oh, the humanity!!

[Ron Green]

4. Oh, the humidity!

[ellenfl]

3. no hair? looked like panties to me. eom

[Sanity Claws]

22. Brazilian wax

I thought she wasn't wearing panties.
What kind of a dancer doesn't wear panties while dancing? There are special dancer's panties to prevent this kind of mishap.

[Zywiec]

41. What if she shaves? n/t

[Lone_Star_Dem]

45. That's the trend now. Waxing is the new thing to do down there.

Has been for a few years. Hurts like hell though so I imagine eventually the trend will revert back to the old natural look.

[EOTE]

84. They have vulvas of the hairless variety now?

The wonders of the modern age will never cease to amaze me. I really need to get out more.

[Mojorabbit]

94. Brazillian wax. nt

[EOTE]

142. I use that stuff on my car all the time.

I think it's called carnauba or something like that. Just for shits and giggles, I tried it on my junk, but now I just have really shiny pubes. Better than nothing, I guess.

[Mojorabbit]

161. LOL... nt

[Omar4Dems]

153. "Brazillian? That's a lot!" -- G.W. Bush

No pun intended. :evilgrin:

[Anakin Skywalker]

111. Oh, Silly! Nobody Has Hair Anymore Down There!

The trend has been towards clean shaven (or waxed or whatever) since the 1990s. LOL

[LWolf]

116. For those that give a shit about trends,

and are willing to waste the time and endure the discomfort. :spray:

[TorchTheWitch]

155. I've gotten rid of mine since it showed up

I should probably own stock in Gilette.

[Rabrrrrrr]

5. Oh, for fuck's sake. Why does anyone give a shit? Who are the prudish obsessive sickos

who decided to rewind and watch this over and over and over so that they could be outraged by it?

I wish Americans would fucking grow up.

[gmoney]

29. +1

[ellenfl]

40. i just love that it's on faux.

in my experience, faux has the most instances of acts/shows that could be considered for censorship by those righties who are so gung ho on censorship.

ellen fl

[MadBadger]

64. Except itts not on faux

[ellenfl]

110. it is in my town, on the local affiliate, not cable. as well as the op's.

the censorship rules don't apply to cable but do apply to the faux network.

ellen fl

[MadBadger]

124. The term "faux" is for the cable outlet, not the broadcast network.

[ellenfl]

144. says who? i was not aware that you made the rules.

does this mean that chris wallace is no longer a rw hack because he is on the local network on sundays?

ellen fl

[MadBadger]

145. Faux was created by Olbermann to stand for Fox News.

Now sure Fox News takes over Fox for an hour on Sundays and then it is one in the same. But other than that, Fox News has really nothing to do with the broadcast network Fox.

[ellenfl]

147. fox is faux, faux is fox. as far as my stations go. they are not distinguishable. eom

[MadBadger]

156. Would Fox News ever have something as left-wing as Family Guy or The Simpsons?

With their own show? I dont think so. There is a difference.

[ellenfl]

164. fox broadcasting and fox news are owned by rupert murdoch.

for rupert, money trumps ideology.

ellen fl

[guitar man]

60. I rewound it and watched it over and over

But I wasn't outraged by it :P

[paparush]

134. We Salute Your Sacrifice Guitar Man, Seeker of Truth!

:-)

[guitar man]

138. hey it's a dirty job

but somebody's got to do it :D

[HughBeaumont]

70. "BUT IT'S A WOMAN'S BABY MAKER ON TEEVEEE!!!"

I truly don't get it either. It's a body part. Shit the bed and kill the cats. This is the kind of thing Americans care about . . . not whether we're getting Universal Health Care or not.

[dipsydoodle]

6. If so then so what.

This is 2010 not 1910.

[Dreamer Tatum]

16. I'll tell you why it "matters." Pay attention, it's convoluted.

The show is on Fox. Fox is a sister network to Fox News, aka "Faux News," "Faux Snooze," etc. Fox News is EEEEEEVIL.

So one way to make life difficult for Fox is to become a puritan and send complaints about stupid bullshit like this to the FCC in some sort of fleeting hope that they'll get reprimanded or tossed off the air.

That's pretty much it.

[Dreamer Tatum]

7. So if you slow it down about 90%, you get a tiny flash of a crotch?

And this upsets you? Really?

[Ian David]

11. Nope. Doesn't upset me one bit. But it's on Fox. n/t

[LuvNewcastle]

8. On what station did the famous

Janet Jackson Superbowl Nipplegate occur? Was that Fox?

[onenote]

17. CBS

although fox has been fined for "indecency" for other programming.

[mnhtnbb]

9. Puts Janet Jackson's wardrobe malfunction to shame! No panties there to bunch!

[onenote]

10. are you seriously suggesting duers file a complaint about this?

The complaints filed, and fines imposed, for the Janet Jackson nipple slip were stupid enough. Why would we want to encourage more stupid?

[Ian David]

14. It was the pResident that Fox helped put in office that started this mess.

If we want to get rid of these shitty rules, then we have to use them against the people who pushed for them in the first place.

I WANT to see vaginas on TV.

[Dreamer Tatum]

20. Then rent porn and tell us what you think

You might also try seeing a real one, in person, if you can ever drop avocations like this one.

[Ian David]

25. LOL! That was a good one. n/t

[onenote]

21. they have been used against fox

and fox, along with the other networks, has rightly opposed them. But don't imagine that this "mess" is going to end because bush is out of office. One of the loudest, most persistent advocates of "indecency" regulation has been Michael Copps, along with support from both sides of the aisle in Congress (most notably Sen. Rockefeller).

[cherokeeprogressive]

37. Feel free to send a complaint in my name. Formally, it's capital C, and capital P.

[Renew Deal]

27. What will we tell the children?

:yoiks:

[704wipes]

121. yes, defund fox with fcc fines

nt

[onenote]

163. a lesson in basic math

the maximum fine for violating the FCC's indecency rules is $32,500 per violation.

Assuming this incident was found to consitute a violation (it wont be) and that the maximum forfeiture was imposed (it wouldn't be), the total penalty imposed on Fox for the 17 stations that it owns would amount to $552,500. That is less than what Fox would happily spend fighting the forfeiture in court.

not exactly a route to "de-funding" fox

[HiFructosePronSyrup]

12. Giggity

[BlooInBloo]

23. Giggity goo.

[Guy Whitey Corngood]

92. Is that the Fox spokesman?

[BlooInBloo]

112. Nah - one of the stars of a cartoon teevee show.

[Guy Whitey Corngood]

118. I was joking. Who else but

Quagmire?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k8r6ReXWHSg

[Tierra_y_Libertad]

13. Eeek!! Quick, get the smelling salts!!

[derby378]

15. We wanted a public option, but we get a pubic option instead

Isn't this a violation of the penile code?

:hide:

[condoleeza]

26. BOYCOTT THE ADVERTISERS!!! they should have known there would be a violation of the penile code.

[Contrary1]

67. Only if she is a Democrat.

[EOTE]

18. Not to be too technical regarding something this silly...

But it appears that it was her vulva that was exposed and not her vagina. As Brittney Spears and Lindsay Lohan have taught us as of late, flashing one's vulva is perfectly acceptable decorum. Flashing one's vagina crosses the line of good taste.

[ohheckyeah]

72. Really.

If HP is going to post crap they could at least use proper terminology.

[Rude Dog]

19. I'm sure...

...that the so-called "Parents' Television Council" would love to have you as a member.

[villager]

24. Why would we want to help the Blue Nose cause by filing a complaint?

:shrug:

[Lerkfish]

28. geez. give me a break

someone has too much free time.

[onlyadream]

30. I really doubt she's not wearing anything...

dancers wear shear panties or one piece body suits. They jump, kick, do splits - it's just way too easy to expose yourself.

[Quantess]

31. I didn't see anything.

She probably had dark underwear. Anyway, that was a non-event.

[anigbrowl]

32. I think this is the most important issue in America right now. .nt

[Warren DeMontague]

33. I had to watch, just to find out how offended to get.

If the shot had been clearer, I might have been able to work up a little more offendedness.

[rurallib]

36. 17 times and I still don't see much.

[Bobbie Jo]

85. 17 times?

:rofl:

[EOTE]

87. 84 times here and I think I'm beginning to see something.

I think the key is to look PAST the image like those glassless 3D images so that the image is slightly out of focus.

[Fresh_Start]

34. take an anatomy class

or take a book out of the library and look at the pictures because you don't understand what a vagina is.

[omega minimo]

44. The OP is real big

on being one of the Science Hall Monitors around here also. :spray:

[HiFructosePronSyrup]

49. Title's from the linked article.

:shrug:

[rug]

35. I think I saw a grassy knoll in Frame 87.

[lutefisk]

38. Did you see Bush?

Poppy Bush was there that day. He had his hand in a lot of things back in his CIA days.

[kestrel91316]

39. My pet peeve: confusion between the vagina and the vulva.

The vagina is a HOLE, so that is not usually subject to "exposure". With pantie mishaps, the lips of the VULVA are easily exposed.

Vagina and vulva are not synonyms. There is an anatomical difference.

[omega minimo]

43. "The vagina is a HOLE" is incorrect also.

The vagina is internal, "so that is not usually subject to "exposure"."

[kestrel91316]

51. Semantics. I have studied more vaginas (granted, nonhuman) than

most people could imagine, lol. The hole that a vagina constitutes is OF COURSE internal. It is an OPENING.

[omega minimo]

58. You're still wrong with your sementics and clinical, external POV

"The hole that a vagina constitutes......."

The vagina doesn't "constitute" a hole. What you call a "hole" is an opening to the vagina, which is internal. It is not the "hole."

And you're a scientist?

[HiFructosePronSyrup]

61. Tell us again about how the full moon causes menstruation.

Oh great learn-ed sage of female anatomy.

[SidDithers]

68. ROFL!!!...

absolutely beautiful reply :applause:

Sid

[Codeine]

74. Bwwwahaahaahahahaa!

God that shit was classic.

[Curtland1015]

89. HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

Great!

[rfranklin]

46. I prefer "Golden Palace of the Himalayas"

As written by Neil Simon.

[uppityperson]

78. I didn't read far enough to find your post, here is mine on what a Vagina is and misuse of the term.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=6664761&mesg_id=6665966

The vagina is the passageway between the vulva (the lips you see on the outside) and the cervix/uterus. Not a hole, but a passageway, but I agree it is really annoying when people misuse the terms.

[HamdenRice]

82. I first read that as "my pet beav"

as in beaver.

[Hippo_Tron]

129. I couldn't even see the lips of the vulva

I think the vulva technically contains the part above the lips as well and so I could see that part. It looked like skin to me...

[T Wolf]

42. I don't really care, but if it can be used as a weapon to attack Fox, then I'm all for it.

The hypocrisy of the trailer-trash network and its reich-wing partner needs to be called out.

[Liquorice]

47. No one would go on a dancing show without underwear on. nt

[pipi_k]

52. No kidding! With all that jumping around they do, it would be a miracle

to NOT see an uncovered crotch...


anyway, it looks like the girl's got black underpants on.

[cbdo2007]

48. This is becoming more common on MTV/VH1 and even Colbert a few months ago.

They purposely do this quite a bit on the VH1/MTV reality shows with the sexy girls and their short skirts.

Also a few months ago when Colbert had some cheerleaders on one of them def flashed vag on the tv.

I think it's one of the new things shows do to get publicity. Then they just say it was panty shadow or something and with no way to prove it, nobody gets in trouble.

[Yuugal]

50. Can we work Roman Polanski into this thread?

oops. :)

[pipi_k]

55. If you look closely enough, you can see Roman Polanski's face

smiling up from her ass.



:7

[Hubert Flottz]

69. I thought I saw a Groppenfuhrer too!

[Tommy_Carcetti]

53. Wow. And just when I thought there was absolutely no reason to watch "So You Think You Can Dance"...

....they give me one.

[Sebastian Doyle]

66. And there's the real answer

FOX is just desperate to get viewers for this goddamn stupid show, which is even dumber than the dumb ABC dancing show that Bugboy is on. Give em a vagina flash, and watch the ratings roll in "just in case it happens again".

Although - just like with the infamous Janet Jackson boobie slip - you'll never actually see it unless you're the obsessive type that watches Tivo/PVR in slow motion just looking for shit. And if you're doing that with stupid "reality" shows.... well that's just a whole new level of "pathetic" right there.

[KittyWampus]

109. Dumb? Some of the best dancers and choreographers are on this show. Look who is dumb

You apparently have never watched the show.

[cbdo2007]

54. CBS has "accidentally" shown penis during at least 2 episodes of survivor

What's the big deal? I've seen penis and vagina both in real life so I'm not going to be all "up in arms" about seeing it on tv.

[Ian David]

57. Oh, sure. Just surrender to your new Vaginal Overlords. n/t

[MineralMan]

56. Did anyone actually go and view this video?

If so, how disappointing.

[foxfeet]

59. "So You Think You Can Dance On Your Camel Toe?"

Edit: punctuation

[EmilyAnne]

63. "So You Think You Can Dance Without Panties?"

[704wipes]

123. Panties are Socialist !!

nt

[Contrary1]

62. Not a big deal to me, whether she is sans undies or not...

But, I do have an observation. I assume this whole thing happened rather quickly, and yet there was a cameraman all ready to zoom in for a closeup.

Methinks it was planned.

[MurrayDelph]

65. At least we know it was a real faint

unlike the time Marie Osmond pretended to faint in order to get sympathy points on Dancing with the Stars.

According to Kathy Griffin, it you don't show coochie, it wasn't a real faint.

[lpbk2713]

71. Who would have guessed?

This post isn't even two hours old yet and it already has over two thousand hits.

:rofl:


If the Mods don't lock it we might have a new record. :eyes:

[madokie]

73. heres the poll results anyway

Quick Poll
What are we looking at?
vag

65.48%

panties crease

34.52%


Read more at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/30/vagina-exposed-on-so-you_n_304592.html

[rd_kent]

75. So what?

Its a vagina.

[uppityperson]

76. If you're going to complain, LEARN YOUR ANATOMY! Vulva, not vagina

The vagina is the passageway, the vulva are what you see on the outside. The vagina is the passageway that connects the vulva with the cervix on the uterus.

This is rather like saying you see someone's esophagus when you really see their lips on their face.

Did she spread her vulva so you could see past the (probably non-existent) hymen to her vagina? Has anyone ever had a pap smear when the speculum is inserted into the vagina, past the vulva?

grumble grumble grumble at wrongly naming anatomical parts.

http://www.plannedparenthood.org/teen-talk/body-mind/anatomy/vulva-an-owners-manual-25172.htm

[Ian David]

79. I'm not complaining. n/t

[BlooInBloo]

83. I just say "cooter" and avoid the whole issue.

:P

[Mojorabbit]

96. .

:rofl: :spray:

[TorchTheWitch]

154. kitty or cookie

it's sounds much more cute.

[triple point]

77. I love DU, it's one of a few places one can generate outrage and controversy with virtually any

post.

It doesn't matter at all what's the subject or even if it's opinionated, the mere mention of practically anything is guaranteed to gyrate the hormones of a very vocal contingent with plenty of free time to express their
personal horror. It's GREAT! :D :D :rofl: :D :silly: :evilgrin: :rofl:

[Treo]

80. As long as it wasn't mary Murphy or Mia Michael's NT

[Cali_Democrat]

81. Meh

nt

[ecstatic]

86. Every anchor on Faux News would be going crazy over this incident

had it occurred on another network.

[immoderate]

88. I didn't see anything.

Believe me, I tried really hard. :shrug:

--imm

[Toasterlad]

90. Gross.

:hide:

[bigwillq]

91. File a complaint?

:wtf:

Seriesly? :shrug:

[MilesColtrane]

93. A bold move by Fox.

But, even if this is a weekly feature, I'm still not watching the show.

[Zodiak]

95. I didn't see anything

And if I did not see anything with it blown up and slowed down, I seriously doubt that it is worth bringing to anyone's attention.

Man, talk about too much time with the TIVO.

[Gold Metal Flake]

97. It was as clear as the beaver shot in Basic Instinct.

Which is the say, nothing could be seen. Much ado about no-tang.

[Ian David]

101. LOL! n/t

[Hippo_Tron]

128. I was about to say the same thing

I'm sure there's a vagina there but I certainly didn't see it.

[Individualist]

98. so she had vaginal prolapse?

[TrogL]

99. Somebody's got waaaaaayyy too much time on their hands

I saw the original show at full speed on a big high-definition TV.

I have a filthy mind.

I didn't see anything.

[KansDem]

100. I think the microphone deserves some mention...

Its phallic appearance adds much to the symbolism of the event...

[Orsino]

102. If she had merely flashed a gun...

...the young lady would have the Second Amendment to protect her.

If it's proven she was in possession of a vagina, though, that'll be serious business.

[Uncle Joe]

103. That was the slowest motion clip I've seen since the Matrix. n/t

[Thickasabrick]

104. I'm sorry - I think she was wearing panties. I can't believe I actually

watched this.

[LisaL]

117. I looked at it and I don't see any panties.

[RebelOne]

143. Actually, if she was wearing panties, I would think they would

be white as she was wearing a white dress. I didn't see anything white.

[Soylent Brice]

105. TV is really turning around these days.

:evilgrin:

[Holly_Hobby]

106. Anatomy lesson

The vagina is internal, it cannot be seen by spreading one's legs, unless an instrument called a speculum is inserted, and a light is shined into the cavity.

Externally, the vulva and labia can be seen.

http://www.innerbody.com/image/repfov.html

[Forkboy]

107. Sure looks like an undersmile to me.

[Stevenmarc]

108. Well Fox news certainly has no shortage of douche bags

[GreenPartyVoter]

113. I saw it last night. I was surprised that she wasn't wearing spankies the color of her costume, but

I definitely didn't think she was naked. What dancer in her right mind would audition on TV without something covering her?

[cliffordu]

114. I didn't know there were photos of vaginas on the internet.

Whattaya know.

[LWolf]

115. What do I think?

I think she's a drama queen.

I don't really care what was under, or not under, the dress. If something was inappropriate, it wasn't between her legs.

[alarimer]

119. I am sure the freepers are playing that over and over and over again

just so they can build up a real head of steam over it.

So to speak.

[nadinbrzezinski]

120. And I should care because...

there are issues in the world far more important than this false outrage. Don't care who whips it up.

You see we are human, we have them parts, they are required for sex, which is required for reproduction. GROW THE FUCK UP!

Oh and this goes for the damn fucking puritanical United States!

Oh the humanity if some folks saw some European TV...

[Ozymanithrax]

122. As quick as the seen passes in real time,

It is amazing that anybody notices.

I am sure there will be a new addition to Mary's rules.

[Cash_thatswhatiwant]

125. wow

[Forkboy]

126. Best use of a gif image EVER!

:rofl:

[Raine]

127. It looked like NO panties to me nt

[Norrin Radd]

130. Or...uncensored genitals are a few clicks away on a search engine.

Whatevs...

[SeattleGirl]

131. Looks to me like she has underwear on.

I think some people are seeing things that just are there. so to speak......

[cbdo2007]

132. Definitly clam sandwich there!!

[L. Coyote]

133. So it's true, they really do exist

:rofl: Like this matters :rofl:

[paparush]

135. Lebowski - Source of All Wisdom

She has no problem with this.

Maude Lebowski: Does the female form make you uncomfortable, Mr. Lebowski?
The Dude: Uh, is that what this is a picture of?
Maude Lebowski: In a sense, yes. My art has been commended as being strongly vaginal which bothers some men. The word itself makes some men uncomfortable. Vagina.
The Dude: Oh yeah?
Maude Lebowski: Yes, they don't like hearing it and find it difficult to say whereas without batting an eye a man will refer to his dick or his rod or his Johnson.
The Dude: Johnson?

[SOS]

136. Won't somebody please think of the children?

As with the Janet Jackson episode, it is time to start filing law suits against Fox.
Children exposed to this on Fox may be in need of expensive psychological counseling to help them deal with the trauma.
Fox should compensate the victims for pain and suffering.
Fox should also pay for all psychiatric treatment required by those who were emotionally crippled by this dancing show.

As a template, here are links to lawsuits filed by right-wingers against CBS in the Jackson incident:

http://popdirt.com/another-lawsuit-against-super-bowl-halftime-show/27156/

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/janetsuit1.html

[LeftHander]

137. Fox has been exposing us to dicks for years....

Glenn Beck
Bill O'Rielly...


blah blah

[spanone]

139. huffpo has gone reall classy, eh?

[redqueen]

141. Gone? They've been like this for a while. (nt)

[AzDar]

140. Nothing Could Be Finer Than To See Some Non-Vaginer In The Moooorning!

:rofl:

[anonymous171]

146. lol

[gooey]

148. Huh?

Is this really a topic on DU? What does this have to do with Democrats? I'm confused. :(

[cbdo2007]

149. Dems love the Va-Jay-Jay

[cbdo2007]

150. The proof is in the panties - TMZ photo proves flesh colored panties

Glad we could put this one to bed finally:

http://www.tmz.com/2009/10/01/so-you-think-you-can-dance-flash-dancer-photo/

[TorchTheWitch]

158. uh... where?

Unless she's wearing a t-back that exactly matches her skin tone (good luck with that), that photo just makes it more apparent that she's not wearing panties.

Frankly, looking at the stills, I'm not seeing any panties... http://www.omgblog.com/2009/09/omg_a_vagina_on_teevee.php

And really... wearing a white dress as a costume, why in the world would she be wearing flesh colored panties, particularly some miracle panties that exactly matched her skin tone?

[cbdo2007]

160. Your right...now that I look at it some more it looks doctored to me

It def. does look "darker" around the panty line area but it does around her shoulders as well. Looks like it could have been photoshopped to make it look like panties but the originally video def. does NOT look like panties there. It looks like meat curtains!

Still inconclusive

[Omar4Dems]

151. This thread is meaningless without pictures.

:evilgrin:

Edit: was the dancer by chance, Jessica Rabbit?
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_7Bqr1I5gzyk/SixUy8OrGpI/AAAAAAAADoQ/rlXve1BOpSI/s400/a+jessica.jpg

[Nuclear Unicorn]

152. Don't give the wingnuts...

...an excuse to go after the next Janet Jackson.

Just because it is FOX don't think the Puritan Purity Brigade won't throw this young woman under the bus.

Making woman ashamed of their bodies is a means of male control over women.

[Stinky The Clown]

157. Erm ... would it not be more technically correct to identify the exposed part(s) as labium or labia?

Even in that asinine slowmo it was impossible to actually identify an actual vagina. And actual labia **might** have been discernible.

[Madrone]

159. You'll have to excuse me if I don't rush off immediately to file a complaint -

-asking to save us from the eeeeeeeeevil vaginas.

;)

[asdjrocky]

162. Oh for fucks sack who cares?

You know all of us, every single person in the world came out of one of those and said hi to the world for the first time.

God, can we get any more stupid?

[boobooday]

165. Okay, so what if I sort of fell down,

and my vulva popped out?

That would be great!

We're rolling! And 5 . . . 4 . . . 3 . . .

What good does it do to file a complaint? If the FCC takes action , it won't be much, and we're just going to have to see it over and over again, and they will get tons of free publicity for their show, and people will tune in hoping to see more vulvas. The next thing you know we'll have a whole reality show about dancing vulvas. You're playing right into their hands.