Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Half of all Americans favor taxing the richest by 50% or more: New CBS News poll

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Newsjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-27-09 07:49 PM
Original message
Half of all Americans favor taxing the richest by 50% or more: New CBS News poll
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2009/09/27/entertainment/e170040D44.DTL&tsp=1

Half the respondents of a new poll say taxing the richest Americans by at least 50 percent is a great idea, while more than a third consider Twitter a fad that will likely fade.

Those are among the findings of a new "60 Minutes"-Vanity Fair Poll released Sunday.

Nearly half of the respondents chose Wal-Mart as the institution that best symbolizes America today, leaving in the dust runners-up Google, Microsoft, the NFL, and the banking and securities firm Goldman Sachs.

Poll details here: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/09/25/60minutes/main5339910.shtml?tag=cbsnewsSectionContent.1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-27-09 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. Cool! And in a democracy, majority rules.
Right? :shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-27-09 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. No - otherwise groups would not have civil rights - the majority can be tyrants!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-27-09 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. So can a president. I would prefer to be tyrannized by my fellow citizens
than by an unelected executive or his cabinet members.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-27-09 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. tyrannized by your fellow citizens
That's kind of what happened to gay people in all the states that simply voted by referendum to ban gay marriage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vadawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-27-09 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. someting about two wolves and a lamb comes to mind and their dinner choice :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grok Donating Member (228 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-27-09 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. all the filty rich should get kicked out of this country.


and their blood money too! we don't need it.

Let them try to set up shop elsewhere where taxes are less. they won't have the infrastructure will they?

I just bet they won't succeed. we have the best,hardest-working people here by far.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulsby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-27-09 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. yet another reflexive "i hate the rich" post
i've lived poor and amongst the poor. i've lived amongst the extremely wealthy. people are people. i'm not going to hate anybody, call them "filthy" anything, merely based on their bankroll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamanaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-27-09 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. So if you are on a tiny island with seven survivors including yourself,
and five of them - a majority - vote to consume you, you'd be ok with that? Majority rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-28-09 01:29 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Of course I was kidding. Who am I to deny 1% of the population 80% of the wealth. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-28-09 02:49 AM
Response to Reply #11
17. That's what happens when you don't have a Bill of Rights or a Declaration of the Rights of Man.
Most nations that claim to be democracies are not pure democracies anyway. There are constraints and limitations and safety valves, such as a right to a fair trial or some other such safety device, in most national constitutions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-27-09 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'm not sure of the correlation between taxation and Twitter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-27-09 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. And yet our government won't even touch those proposals
Really shows you who has the power in our "democracy."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-27-09 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
7. The tax cuts for the top 1% are expiring next year
I think next October to be exact. I've actually been surprised by how non-controversial this has been so far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProdigalJunkMail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-27-09 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
10. when a group of foxes was given the choice between
the sheep and the grass...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
armyowalgreens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-28-09 01:33 AM
Response to Original message
14. I don't trust internet polls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-28-09 01:39 AM
Response to Original message
15. Too bad it's the half that are completely ignored.
Edited on Mon Sep-28-09 01:40 AM by Marr
I was reading today about Milton Friedman, and though I'd heard it all before, this point really struck me for the first time. Friedman thought the only two proper functions of government were law enforcement and the military. That is to say, he thought we need peons to protect the assets of the wealthy inside the country, and peons to protect the assets of the wealthy outside the country. But the peons get nothing.

I suppose it never even occurred to him that, in his construct, the wealthy are a purely parasitic class. They take everything and give back nothing. They demand absolute sacrifice and subservience from the rest of the society, and contribute nothing.

Tell me again how this man was considered intelligent? I can't see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-28-09 02:32 AM
Response to Original message
16. Count me as part of that 50% that thinks we should tax the hell out of um
I'm kind of shocked that only 50% think we should tax them that high. Unless someone is part of the top 10% of rich folks, I have no idea why they would be against this. The rich NEVER pay their share. They used to be taxed much higher. This is part of why things have gone to shit - there isn't enough tax money coming in for the stuff we, as a nation, need. The rich, the republicans, and foxnews are to blame IMO. Tax the rich fucks!!! Tax um long and tax um hard! The rich have always fucked us. And the rich will continue to fuck us until we MAKE them stop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 03:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC