WSWS is often sloppy with their language and their ultimate "solutions", such as they are, are rather vague however their analysis is usually quite accurate and they are certainly a more trusted news source that such propaganda outlets as the NY Times. However even the main Paper of Record tells us this same story though as is usual they ignore the context and avoid saying anything that would upset the powers that be since their job is to echo the sentiments of the ruling class. Don't you agree?
------------
More Than 1 Billion Go Hungry, the World Food Program Says
By REUTERS
Published: June 12, 2009
High food prices have pushed another 105 million people into hunger in the first half of 2009, the leader of the United Nations World Food Program said on Friday in Rome. She said the total number of hungry people around the world was now more than one billion. At a meeting of the Group of 8’s development ministers, Josette Sheeran, the food program’s executive director, said the world faced a “human catastrophe.” “This year, we are clocking in, on average, four million new hungry people a week — urgently hungry,” Ms. Sheeran said. The agency needs $6.4 billion this year for food aid, she said, but donors’ contributions have fallen far behind that level. The agency had around $1.5 billion at the end of last week. Ms. Sheeran said it had had to cut food aid rations and shut down some operations in eastern Africa and North Korea because of the credit crunch.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/13/world/13briefs-G8HUNGER.htmlOops have to cut down on food cause global loan sharks have credit crunch. All of this is the natural order of capitalism not some deviance.
----------------------------
1 billion to go hungry world over
AGENCIES 17 September 2009, 12:05am IST
LONDON: Food aid is at a 20-year low despite the number of critically hungry people soaring this year to its highest level ever, the UN relief agency said on Wednesday.
The number of hungry people will pass 1 billion this year for the first time, the UN World Food Program (WFP) said, adding that it is facing a serious budget shortfall. To date the WFP has confirmed $2.6 billion in funding for its 2009 budget of $6.7 billion. “This comes at a time of great vulnerability for the hungry,” the WFP said.
“Millions have been buffeted by the global financial downturn, their ability to buy food is limited by stubbornly high prices. In addition, unpredictable weather patterns are causing more weather-related hunger,” it said.
An earlier report said that most of sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia are facing extreme or high risk of food shortages, according to a ranking of 148 nations. The US is least at risk followed by France, Canada, Germany and the Czech Republic, according to the Food Security Risk Index, calculated from dozens of variables that determine a country’s capacity to feed its people.
Food stress jumped toward the top of the global agenda after soaring commodity prices in 2007 and 2008 sparked riots in 30 countries, including many tottering on the brink of severe shortages or widespread hunger.
The World Bank estimates that food inflation during that period pushed an additional 100 million people into deep poverty, on top of a billion that were already scraping by on less than $1 a day. The three most populous countries in South Asia also face food precariousness: Pakistan, ranked 11th, is at “extreme risk,” while Bangladesh and India are both at “high risk”, ranked 20th and 25th respectively.
...
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/news/world/uk/1-billion-to-go-hungry-world-over/articleshow/5020227.cmsNext time do your own homework. Your attacks on WSWS already have a thread and it collapsed under the weight of even mild scrutiny.
If you are a defender of the IMF/World Bank programs no more need be said. It is clear you are in support of big business and against the people if that is the case no matter how much jargon you throw into the soup.
The World Bank and International Monetary Fund (IMF) are the biggest pillars of neocolonialism. The World Bank and IMF impose poverty on developing countries through "structural adjustment" programs which cut social spending in the name of paying back foreign debts. The goal and idea of these parasitic institutions is to repress "third world" peoples, control the resources of their land and continue the legacy of colonialism through economic control.