Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Do you really think Rahm Emanuel is pulling the strings?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 09:25 AM
Original message
Do you really think Rahm Emanuel is pulling the strings?
Sure seems a lot of DUers believe that. I think it's a ridiculous assumption. Emanuel follows the President's cues. It's that simple. He was chosen by the President. He's on board on the President's agenda. Don't like Emanuel's politics? Can't say I do either, but he isn't the President. He just serves him. And his position is much more about logistics and politics than policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. Thank you! I have only been saying this in every thread about him.
I can't say I like Rahm much either but he serves Obama, if someone does not like him then blame Obama!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. He thinks he's pulling the strings
which is why he's putting out all those right wing wet dreams about a scuttled health insurance reform.

Unfortunately, the pool of experienced help Obama had to draw from were DLC types, all from Clinton's presidency. The ones who were around for Johnson and Carter are just too long in the tooth, if they're still alive.

I sincerely hope he calls Emanuel on the carpet soon and tells the guy to get on message, his message, not the DLC/Blue Dog/conservative message.

Vacation is over, the boss is back, and Emanuel needs to be reminded of just where he is on the White House organization chart.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. wow. so you know what Emanuel is thinking. clever trick
And I'm sure you don't mind providing some evidence for your claims that he's spreading a right wing message. Look, he's representing Obama. Don't like it? Blame Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
3. CoS is more about WH logistics
who gets to see the POTUS, what committees/groups meet and when.

CoS certainly has a lot of influence and pull, but the President is the boss at the end of the day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Torn_Scorned_Ignored Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #3
13. I agree
but one area I believe Rahm controls is whose letters/emails the President gets. If I'm right this could be a hindrance to Obama's words, I will always listen to you.

In another vein, this could also keep important and urgent info (to the person writing or requesting) from reaching the Oval Office.
Rahm shouldn't be the judge of what may or may not be of interest to the President.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sufrommich Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
5. I've always thought it is insulting to Obama to imply
that he is being lead around by the nose, like a cute puppy with no bite. I don't know why anyone would believe such a thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #5
24. Because in reality, this is essentially an entry level position for the President
It is his first executive position, other than running his own campaign. He is doing a great job, but he needs seasoned politicians to advise him and work the system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
6. Rahm is a lackey. Corporate $$$ are calling this tune. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lamp_shade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
7. Hell no, and I'm totally bewildered by the handful of posters who jump all over
a thread every time his name appears. I don't get it. I love and admire the guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
8. Even if he was, he still isn't the president, and the president makes the decisions /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frustratedlady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
9. No, but I do think he runs defense...or is it offense?
With Rahm, it's probably offensive. He doesn't mince words.

Obama needs someone like Rahm to do his evil eye/mouth for him so it doesn't tarnish his image, but keeps people in their place. You sure couldn't use a "marshmallow-type" in that position.

A Cheney, he is not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
10. Why not get to the core of it all. There is a faction of Democrats who
Edited on Wed Sep-09-09 10:16 AM by peacetalksforall
support the Republican agenda on war and profit and some other issues related to corporate profit. They are organized. It is the DLC. Clintons, Emanuel, Leiberman, and many, many more show their stuff. Who knows it all? Most likely Leiberman can't be DLC now, You could say that part of the Hillary Clinton withdrawal would be that DLC would have an influence whether Obama was active in it prior or not.

There is more to observe and conclude about what is happening in the Democratic Party than picking out one person and playing in like/don't like sessions.

Emanual is probably the ace of aces in organization and staying on top of things.

Emanuel, Negroponte (adviser to Clinton on Honduras), Leitner, Burnanke, - I would like to see Obama cleansed.

Pulling strings? All I can say is I hope not. And it doesn't look like anyone can pull the strings on Obama unless by agreement, but I would guess Emanuel tries - he has an agenda, he is on fire with his agenda and it ain't the citizen friendly.

Just my observations and conclusions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notesdev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
11. The alternative
is to assume Obama himself is leading a policy agenda which in most respects in indistinguishable from the Bush regime's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
12. Frankly, I hope so.
You ask a very important question. If Emanuel is not pulling the strings, I will have to face the fact that my President is a corporate whore who cares more about "winning" than actually doing something good for the American people. I don't want to face that possibility. For the moment, I am happy to blame Emanuel.

:dem:

-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. + 1
What Laelth said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. why is one better than the other? If Rahm is pulling the strings, Obama
is nothing but a puppet. Personally, I reject your theory. i think it's all a great deal more complex than that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
15. I think, ultimately, the President is responsible
That said, I think Rahm leaks like a sieve and I am of the opinion that not all of it has been sanctioned by President Obama. I believe leaky advisers can sabotage an administration's agenda and try to pull a debate their way. Emanuel is offensive and a corporate hack. My anger does go mostly to President Obama and I regularly mention in emails that I will believe he is on the side of the American working class when I hear Rahm has decided it's time to spend more time with his family.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
17. Rahm Covers The Legislative...
As COS and his background in House leadership, Rahm was brought in to handle things with the House and to get things passed. It's not easy, it's not pretty, but he's there cause he knows how this byzantine system works and how to get things done. Yes, it is logistics, but also when policy is decided, logistics have to be taken into consideration.

Some here want a lock-step party where whatever their pet agenda is sails through. I find that ironic since so many of us despised that trait in rushpublicans. Emanuel has to herd the cats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. Rahm does herd the cats
But I would like to see him, just once, go to the minority of Blue Dogs and tell them to play nice with the progressives. Obviously, there are more citizens represented by progressives but those reps are treated like the fringe. And I frequently write the president about how much I hate that attitude and how I am sick of being insulted by his CoS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. We Don't Know What Really Goes On Behind The Closed Doors
The disadvantage of being a majority party...and a broad-based one is that it means you're not going to have everyone on your side all the time. I prefer it that way as opposed to a monolithic party (like the rushpublicans) that have little room for debate or free thinking.

I'm sure the Blue Dogs are getting an earful, but its coming from two ends of the spectrum. Many of these people represent purple and red areas where faux noise and right wing talking points predominate. Their interests are vastly different than a progressive liberal from an inner city or member of the CBC. While I find Blud Dogs iritating, they still are Democrats. If their record or attitude is creating a problem, that's what primaries and helping fun challengers are for. We may see a few of these Blue Dogs pay for their water carrying for the insurance company, but most will use their stand to get re-elected. The trade off is that you can get some or most of these people to vote the right way 50% of the time...that's better than the 0% of a rushpublican.

Rahm can't play favorites or alienate that bloc, but I'm sure he counts votes very closely and will let them make their noise when he knows in the end they'll lose. So it goes...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
18. "The buck stops here." Obama is the boss and Rahm is his stooge.
Rahm floats the trial balloons and takes the flak for Obama's policies. It's ridiculous to think that Obama is unaware of, or doesn't decide, what Rahm says or does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leeroysphitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
21. Pull the string! Pull the string!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
22. You can either think Emanuel is pulling the strings
Or believe that Obama lied to the voters during the campaign and is responsible for all this sucking up to corporations and blue dogs and jumping all over real Democrats.

Was Emanuel part of a Faustian bargain Obama made with the DLC in return for their support in the election? I have no idea, but Howard Dean isn't particularly enamored of him. That's enough for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
23. Yes but not the way WE want nt
Edited on Wed Sep-09-09 11:41 AM by daa
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
25. It's part of the "obambi" thing from back in the good 'ol days. They just like saying that...
Obama is just a puppet. They don't even necessarily believe it, they do it just because it pisses us off. Again, hard to distinguish them from the right-wing - they'll just say whatever random shit sound like it would annoy us, and run with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC