Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I finally got it today...Hannity, Coulter, Limbaugh, et all absolutely QUAKING in their boots...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
youthere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 04:01 PM
Original message
I finally got it today...Hannity, Coulter, Limbaugh, et all absolutely QUAKING in their boots...
I was flipping the dial today perusing the plethora of right wingnut radio station that pollute my radio dial, and listened to them all literally FOAMING at the mouth about the IMUS firing. Rabid, vitriolic, outraged but most of all undeniably paranoid. They are all scared out of their wits because now my friends, there is at long last a PRECEDENT. The bar has been set and they know damn well it's only a matter of time before the disgusting, hateful verbal diarrhea they spew each and every day on the airwaves is going to be their undoing. Over and over they kept posing the same scenario: "You wait and see, it's only a matter of time before all this gets turned on CONSERVATIVE talk programming!"



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yea, too bad it didn't START with conservatives. Hard to believe that's
their label considering the swill they spew.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youthere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. That's why they have to speak out against the IMUS firing so vehemently..
They know damn well they are on thin ice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gatorboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yeah, but MOST conservatives like those bigoted type remarks.
That's why the group you listed use them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
35. OFFICIAL FIRE RUSH, BECK AND COULTER THREAD
We are launching a push against the big three offenders.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x639819

The bar always existed. Now that the executives have discovered where
the bar is, we must hold them to it, or else pretend the firing was for
other reasons. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. No, that would be...
Hate Talk Programming. If the shoe fits...

I was predicting this exact scenario days ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
5. Thanks for clearing something up for me.
It's nice to finally know that hatred, bigotry, racism, murder, torture, war, and civil unrest are CONSERVATIVE talk programming values.

Appreciate it. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youthere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #5
17. I would never be so naiive as to label those traits as uniquely conservative...
there are assholes of every persuasion...the right just seems to be determined to perfect those traits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #17
26. Thanks for the insult.
I guess I should have added the :sarcasm: smilie so some would "get it."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youthere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. The asshole part was not aimed at you...
(sorry about that..should have been more clear) what I meant is that there are jerks on both sides of every issue. Sorry if I offended, it was certainly not meant that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. It's so hard to tell in a written post sometimes.
Please accept my apologies as well, I misunderstood.

I agree, both sides have their share of jerks. It just seems the ones on the right are much more prolific in their spewing of hate. Or, at least, they're harder to avoid, perhaps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youthere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. No Problem...
it is hard to judge mood on a message board, and I don't use the smiley menu much outside the lounge.
:silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NormanYorkstein Donating Member (762 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 12:31 AM
Response to Reply #17
46. sure but on TV and radio it's nearly 100% cons doing the hating
On the internet it certainly goes both ways, libs give it as well as they get it. On the major corporate radio and TV stations, the "liberal" spectrum goes from Alan Colmes to Al Franken. There's just nothing that liberals are doing on radio and TV that compares to the hate speech and slurs on the converstaive side. It's not even close.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #5
42. I call them Fascist Propoganda
Machines. Ain't nothing conservative about them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Casper Alabaster Donating Member (218 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 12:27 AM
Response to Reply #42
45. I see Hate Radio as
the fascist propaganda machine of conservative ideology. I'm not sure relying on the mechanisms of 'market' (advertisers) is going to be enough, but so far so good!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
6. I think you're right.
They are afraid. And they should be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sequoia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
7. Oh Happy Day should that ever happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NormanYorkstein Donating Member (762 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
8. they are scared now because he's off the radio
It seems TV is more skittish, but on radio they can get away with it more. The fact Imus is off the radio now really scares them.

Boycotting the sponsors *works* - we could make sure Limbaugh can only get sponsors like TrimSpa and MLM scams.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
9. Well, those are the unintended consequences of this Imus firing.
But I'll bet they lay low for a few weeks, and then come back just as hateful as ever.

The goal here was to get rid of Imus. The only reason that worked is because the CORPORATE media gave the complainers (who have complained in the past but the corporate media never covered it) a stage, a microphone, and round-the-clock coverage.

See, if they say something hateful, and no one in the corporate media airs the complaints about it, it didn't happen!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
10. Limbaugh has to be called on the so-called first amendmant right of freedom of speech!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Casper Alabaster Donating Member (218 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #10
44. Unclear on your meaning. Abuse thereof? n/t.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
11. I hope they're shitting themselves.
Imus is only the tip of the iceberg, IMHO.

We're coming after them next!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
12. A precedent, a precedent,
A most ingenious precedent!
Ha! ha! ha! ha! Ha! ha! ha! ha!
A precedent!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
13. Been saying this for days
You guys sincerely didn't get where all this spin was coming from? aargh

Now is the time to strike. I can't believe we have to convince any DUer of this clear fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
conscious evolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
14. They should be afraid
Afraid of a war crimes tribunal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
15. It is not just astronauts walking around in adult diapers these days
A whole bunch of highly paid chattering bigots have just found a urgent need to don a pair of the Depends formal wear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
16. One must wonder why they fear the FAIRNESS Doctrine so much
Fearing FAIRNESS? Must be a conservative value.

ray-gun fucked the fairness doctrine in the 80's and gave birth to limbaugh, hannity, et al. I guess conservatives can't operate in a fair environment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youthere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Hannity took on an especially shrill tone today when bringing that up.
Edited on Thu Apr-12-07 04:29 PM by youthere
You know because HEAVEN FORBID (clutch your pearls!) people should hear both sides of an issue...next thing you know they start thinking and before you know it they get ideas....

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
INdemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
19. Not a chance
The right wing corporate media is just too powerful.....Rush Slimebaugh should have been fired a long time ago for statements he's made and the corporate media protected him then as they would now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
20. And that is the only reason why I give a damn
about the Imus saga. The people have told the advertisers enough hate talk.
Coulter better start shaking too. She was the straw before Imus broke the camel's back for absolutely no reason except arrogance and contempt for others. He fugged with the wrong institution and their women this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youthere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. Do you think Imus would have gotten as much fallout...
if it hadn't followed Coulter's remark so closely? Just wondering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #23
36. I think both incidents are connected
People are fed up of Bushco's environment of hate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
21. They're all safe. they support the neo con agenda
Imus didn't. he waffled too much
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
partylessinOhio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #21
28. True. He attacked Cheney and paid with his livelihood for it.
Goodbye Obama too. The backlash will take him out now.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #28
34. That's the point I haven't seen enough people make. Imus attacked Cheney and lost his protection.
As for backlash on Obama, I don't think it will come unless he is locked in for the nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #28
37. I think there is a difference there.
Imus is allowed to be on the airwaves by the corporations who own and run them. They rarely allow anyone to stay on the air for long who is not lockstep RWer.

I think its different with democratic candidates for office, don't you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
22. K&R: Keith started this last night. I'm not sure this will happen tomorrow...
but I think there is change here. For one thing, I think there's a generational change. I don't think my daughter's Gen Y generation, the generation of the Rutgers team, is going to stand for this stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tulsakatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
24. I was sorry to see Imus go.........
yes, he insults people but he's done that for years! The sad thing is, I don't think he meant to insult them, it was just a poor choice of words.......very poor choice.

But on the other hand, if it gets rid of some of the hateful, right wingnut talk radio, it will all have been worth it!!

They should be scared!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Morgana LaFey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #24
40. you don't think he meant to insult them?
Yeah, we women LOVE being called ho's, and black women LOVE being called nappy headed. We hardly ever get upset about it, either.

Just a poor choice of words.

Just a joke.

DU doesn't permit what I'd like to say to you next.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tulsakatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #40
66. actually I am a woman........
...and I am well aware of what it means to be called a ho, whore, prostitute, etc

And no, I never use those words myself. Although I do think it is more commonplace for many people to use them.

Maybe he did intend to insult them but that wasn't my impression when I heard his comment.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Casper Alabaster Donating Member (218 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #24
47. I've heard the soundbite that landed Imus on his ass
probably 10 times today. With a raspy snicker at the end. He most definitely meant to denigrate that team, which most Americans hadn't even heard of until last week. They had no connection to him whatsoever, let alone ever caused him harm. They're just college kids, FFS. They're not public figures, or at least they weren't before this.
He clearly meant to insult and denigrate them because the team is mostly black, and all were women. He used the airwaves to indulge himself in gettin real w/ his audience.
"Nappy-headed hos?", from a shriveled up bitter old white man? Oh Hell No!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
25. didn't some of these same people claim before that
Imus was being unfairly targeted because he was conservative?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youthere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. I hadn't heard any of them take that angle..
though they very well might have. I've only heard them talking about how glad they were a liberal finally got what was coming to them-though Imus could hardly be labeled a liberal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #29
49. thanks--I must have heard someone else saying it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Casper Alabaster Donating Member (218 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #25
43. I did a similar experiment as the OP today,
and the Goebbels talking point was that Imus supported Kerry in '04. Hadn't heard that one before, I suppose it's easy enough to find out. But yeah, the nazis on hate radio are apoplectic that Sharpton and Jesse Jackson are going to knock on the doors of their advertisers.
I wonder what kind of support either of them could garner for any political office if they could get these slime buckets fired from spewing their hate for fun and profit.
Can Limbaugh be gotten rid of in '08? Oh yeah...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #43
50. Imus may have said he supported Kerry but no one can verify if he
voted for him. I stopped listening to his program during the 04 campaign because I got so sick of the kinds of comments that got him in hot water AND because he frequently attacked Democrats unfairly. He seemed to decide whom to support based on who came on his show and charmed him at the moment or made for more entertaining shows, and the next day would take a contradictory stand. Maybe closer to the election he took a more consistent stance. By my definition, though, what I saw wasn't "supportive."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Casper Alabaster Donating Member (218 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #50
52. I don't have a link or anything,
but all the wingnuts swear Imus admitted to voting for Kerry, so this is all a Hugh political win for them! Seriess11!!
Imus does have quite the impressive collection of political/media skeletons/guests in his closet though. He'll probably get a HuGh book deal, but he better line it up fast. By Monday, no reputable person will admit to ever having met him, leaving only his lawyers and accountants! Hahaha!:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #52
57. I think that he DID say that--my point is that it means nothing because
1) no one knows whether he actually did vote for him.
2) he may have said he voted for Bush on another day.

The general tone of discourse and attitudes expressed on the show by McCord and McGuirk in addition to Imus was conservative--and I'm not referring to just the bigoted comments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mimitabby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
31. you mean, they might start acting conservatively??? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youthere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. Good God NO!
that last thing we need is for people to treat each other civilly, and with decency for cryin'out loud! LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rasputin1952 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
38. Boil Butt was talking like he is expecting to be 'attacked' in the
near future; and the little I listened to Beck, he was railing about Olberman's "List"...:scared:

It was the same old stuff, they are pushing their defenses forward because they havbe become worthy targets...:D

Next thhing you'll see is the complaints of how they are being

It is always the same thing w/bullies and arrogant assholes...now they will cry they are victims...:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
randr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
39. Chelsea Clinton
I only hope someone will resurrect the abuse heaped upon our first daughter by the evil right wing including, I believe, Sen. McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youthere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. they were outright cruel to her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Casper Alabaster Donating Member (218 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 01:10 AM
Response to Reply #39
48. I remember that back in the '90s...
big bad Limbaugh, pill-popping multi-millionaire blowhard, defends Murka from the horrible threat posed by the evil socialist puppetmaster Chelsea Clinton, 13 year-old...
(from wiki): Conservative talk show host Rush Limbaugh compared 13-year-old Chelsea to a dog:

* On November 6, 1992, three days after her father won the elections, when Chelsea was still in braces, Rush Limbaugh said the following: "Everyone knows the Clintons have a cat; Socks is the White House cat. But did you know there is also a White House dog?" He then pointed to a video monitor, which switched to a picture of Chelsea. Although Limbaugh has claimed that it was a technical error, as Al Franken documented in his book Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them, since the show was on a tape delay, if it truly was a technical error, it could have been corrected prior to airing of the show.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chelsea_Clinton
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rasputin1952 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #48
53. I remember that...it was a jaw dropping moment...
I didn't think anyone would ever stoop that low...little did I know...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
51. So true, they will all be off the air in months.
You see, the Imus thing has shown that hate speech will not be tolerated. I mean who in their right mind would think that Rush, with one of the largest national audiences will survive? It's fantasy! I give him a few weeks and the corporation that broadcasts him will have him and Hannity and the others OFF the air. It's not like these people make any money for their companies, and it's not like the people who listen to them will tolerate what they say now. They all know they are wrong.

Us playing by PC rules and condeming all unPC has given us an advantage that the other side just does not understand, because we are the better people for it, and they know it, and now respect us even MORE!

So when the election cycle comes around and Imus is still a very fresh issue, and Rush, Hannity, Coulter, and all the big market conservatives are gone off the air, the country will be completely spared the ugly and nasty talking points, because they all if not learned a lesson, will be gone.

It makes my heart proud to see the new glorious day for us. Like that song, "programmed by guys with compassion and vision". That's our future, a controlled and benign government that works for US, and is free from all the bad things that the iMoment brought about.

The other side sees that it has lost. They will completely change.

Happy thoughts...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youthere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #51
55. I don't know that I would go so far as to say they will be completely OFF the air...
but at the very least MSNBC and CBS have set a standard above the rest of the media outlets and said THEY won't tolerate it (hopefully others will follow) . I'm sure there will always be someone that will give the Imus'and Limbaughs of the world a bully pulpit but now we know LEGITIMATE media won't put up with this kind of behavior. CBS and MSNBC have made themselves the current "gold standard" for on air behavior. It may not be much, but right now, it's all we got.;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #55
56. Why not? It's within weeks that this will occur, and the iMoment will be remembered every
Edited on Fri Apr-13-07 08:52 AM by Neshanic
time they open their mouth...so by the election in 08' it will still be standard.

Also all those rap hate speech songs, and videos will be off the air.

Happy thoughts...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youthere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #56
60. Oh bullshit.
No one is stopping Imus from saying all the racist crap he wants...MSNBC and CBS just aren't allowing him to do it on their dime. Imus is free to apply for any job at any radio or television station who wishes to hire him and repeat the exact same thing if he chooses. Whoever his employer is will deal with it they way they choose to-that is their right.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Casper Alabaster Donating Member (218 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #56
62. You're also wrong about rap,
so-called hate-speech (dissidents/partisans/terrorist's propaganda), and our videos.
Within weeks, all of the bad people who forced Imus to express his concern about black chicks he never met will control the Entire World! BWAAAhahaha! As you can see, you are really quite incapable of stopping us!
It is most unfortunate that you happened to notice that which will be edited from broadcasting, unfortunate indeed...:spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #62
63. Oh my!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Casper Alabaster Donating Member (218 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #63
65. It's all true!
The fundie christofascists unwittingly do our bidding. Just ask Imus. And watch your step, if you know what we mean.
The last thing we wanted was a media-scene, but people like you refused to be 'good Germans'. You people forced our hand!:spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Casper Alabaster Donating Member (218 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #51
58. I'm not sure the use of the word "true" is acceptable,
as it implies a judgment demanded, imperceptible by mere human beings. The mere fact that a decision must be made makes your post highly suspect.
Not funny. At all. The general tone of your post draws scrutiny, and is altogether suspicious, which could lead to all sorts of unnecessary unpleasantness...
Happy Thoughts!:spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #58
59. Thank you for pointing these items out! I will be more carefull in the shiny future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Casper Alabaster Donating Member (218 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #59
61. Future? Quite unacceptable.
You're discriminating against both the present and the past! You're a... a, time-ist! You're worse than Hitler!
OK, I lose!:dunce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #61
64. Oh no! Not that! I am crying as I type this!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
54. Yes you have got it
This changes everything.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC