Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

California regulators take on chromium 6 (chemical made famous by the 2000 film "Erin Brockovich.")

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Kadie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-20-09 07:49 PM
Original message
California regulators take on chromium 6 (chemical made famous by the 2000 film "Erin Brockovich.")
California regulators take on chromium 6

Kelly Zito, Chronicle Staff Writer

Thursday, August 20, 2009

(08-20) 16:53 PDT Sacramento -- California on Thursday took the first step in the nation toward setting maximum drinking water levels for the cancer-causing chemical made famous by the 2000 film "Erin Brockovich."

After a controversial decade of study on the health effects of hexavalent chromium, or chromium 6, the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment on Thursday proposed a level of 0.06 parts per billion for the heavy metal.

Regular drinking water exposure below that level would qualify as "negligible risk," according to researchers.

The proposal, which is subject to further review and public comment, is not an enforceable standard. However, it represents the initial step in developing a state-wide chromium 6 ceiling for drinking water under the Department of Public Health - a criteria likely several years in the making. That, in turn, would give authorities the power to order cleanup of contaminated drinking water sources.

snip...
Shortly after the Julia Roberts' vehicle "Erin Brockovich" publicized the chromium 6-cancer link among the residents of Hinkley, California - who eventually won a $333 million settlement from Pacific Gas and Electric - then-Gov. Gray Davis signed a bill ordering regulators to develop a chromium 6 standard for drinking water by Jan. 1, 2004.

In 2001, a blue ribbon panel determined that drinking water with chromium 6 posed no risks (it has long been considered harmful when inhaled). But that conclusion faltered when it came to light that two members of the panel had been paid consultants to PG&E.

more...
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/08/20/BAET19BGHH.DTL&tsp=1





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC