Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A possible end-game scenario for healthcare bill?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 11:34 PM
Original message
A possible end-game scenario for healthcare bill?
The House passes a bill with a public option. The Senate passes a bill with a co-op option. It goes to committee for reconciliation. There is a gridlock. They cannot agree on either. The President steps in to try and resolve the problem. He talks with each Senator on the committee. They finally reach an agreement. What do you think it will be?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bkkyosemite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-19-09 12:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. It better not be co-op.........HR 676
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-19-09 12:56 AM
Response to Original message
2. The House of Lords will say "No," while Harry Reid counts his health care money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
csziggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-19-09 01:00 AM
Response to Original message
3. How about this scenario - the only bill that CBO approves is HR676
The rest cost a lot of extra money and would require tax increases. H. R. 676 saves a ton of money and provides health care for every American.

Game over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
regnaD kciN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-19-09 02:14 AM
Response to Original message
4. Here's a possible compromise -- a SINGLE national co-op...
...which would basically be set up exactly like a public option program, except "spun off" into a non-profit corporation rather that directly run by the government, much like the postal service is distinct from the government.

Since it's still a single entity, it would be able to bargain effectively in ways that fifty or more separate, smaller co-ops, as the "blue dogs" want, wouldn't be able to do. It would essentially have the same leverage, power, and size as a federally-run public option, except that they could say it "wasn't a government-run plan."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 04:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC