Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Would there be all this "outrage" if Obama were white?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Hugabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 12:43 PM
Original message
Would there be all this "outrage" if Obama were white?
If Hillary or Biden were president, but everything else were exactly the same - would we be seeing all this "outrage"? Would we be seeing all these thugs organizing "tea parties", or attempting to disrupt congressional town hall meetings? I think we all know the answer to this. Sure, the right-wing propaganda machine would be in full force, just like it was during Bill Clinton's administration. But even when Hillary was looking into health care reform during the 90s, we never saw the level of hatred and vitriol that we see now. I don't recall seeing any conservative thugs organizing in various cities. For the most part, they griped about it to their friends, co-workers, etc - but that was about it.

As bad as Limbaugh might have been, people like Glen Beck, Sean Hannity, and Michael Savage have taken it to the next level. They walk right up to the line of calling for armed insurrection - never actually saying so much, but leaving no doubt that they wouldn't be disappointed if it were to happen. If we were dealing with President Hillary Clinton or Joe Biden, they sure as hell wouldn't be having their citizenship called into question. Beck & company would still rail against the Democratic president, but they wouldn't be encouraging their sycophant followers to form mobs and disrupt the process.

It's bad enough for these assholes that they have a Democratic president. But they'll be damned if they're going to have to take orders from a black Democratic president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
UndertheOcean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. Obama is already half white , its not helping him much with the bigots though
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. All they see is the color of his skin
And he don't look like them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xenotime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Shouldn't they be judging by the content of his character?
Or have we forgotten that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. We're talking about freeper types here
Freepers, birthers, whatever you want to call them. When was the last time they judged someone by the content of their character, and not based on whether they were black, Hispanic, female, gay, transgendered, etc?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. They don't care what MLK said - he was just another "n----r" to them.
Edited on Tue Aug-04-09 12:50 PM by kestrel91316
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Caliman73 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #7
27. The people who remember that are not the problem
The people who are the problem NEVER believed that in the first place. Racists judge character only in people who are like them. People who are not like them are already judged to be inferior simply because they are not like them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timeforpeace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #7
34. Dismissing criticism of Obama as racism won't work forever. Policy success will go far to alleviate
the criticism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
17. Half-white is WORSE! It means a Black and White "Interbred". This is how they think.
Black man w black woman? OK.

White man w black woman? OK.

White man w black woman? Kinky, and OK.

.

Black man w white woman?

No fucking way!!!

.

This is how the racist male thinks. Pathetic, hateful, disturbing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
40. Doesn't matter to them
any African blood is enough to make him a target in their minds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
46. Bigots are one-percenters when it comes to race; "half" doesn't occur to them. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
74. Obama is brown.
He had a white mother, and a black father.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. They'd just find a different outrage - that's all
It's always something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orwell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
21. Bingo...
...we have a winner.

Being a white southerner sure helped Bill Clinton...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yes and no.
They'd still be carrying on as they are, I just think the degree would be a little different.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
5. No.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
6. He is a Democrat
They can't stand that, add race to it and their skin is crawling with rage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
8. It is an escalation fed by their racism...
They impeached a president for some personal transgressions that had nothing to do with the job. They should have been ashamed but they were willing to disrupt the government and harass the White House with a sham that embarassed us around the world (their behavior, not Bill's.) Now that their conservative paradise has proven to be a total bust, their anger and desperation knows no bounds. They will eventually create an incident that will be the equivalent of a disgruntled employee "going postal." Just a matter of time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
11. No. We'd still hear all the socialist bullshit, but not the "illegitimate" nonsense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
12. I honestly don't think his color matters on this issue.
The difference you see now is that there's much more hatered between the parties now...on both sides. The Pubs are more demonstrative, but the hate is there on our side too. I think that's the main reason Obama has been trying to pudsh so hard for bipartisanship. He's trying to turn back the clock to the days when the parties differed greatly on the issues, but didn't HATE each other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timeforpeace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #12
35. America elected him=not racist but America criticizes=racist? Please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #12
54. the hatred and apparently fear too
there's always been a certain amount of hate, but it seems to have gone mainstream. So far, though, no rioting like in the 1960s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
13. Only the content would be different
All the "outrage" would still be there, it just wouldn't have the racist angle. If Hillary Clinton was president, there would be a definite sexist angle that isn't there now. If Joe Biden or Jon Edwards was president, the racist and sexist angles would be absent, but some other angle, probably elitist, would be there. The pretext doesn't really matter, just the manufacture of "outrage."

The worst thing about this is that the major media outlets are perfectly aware of the astroturf nature of all this, but they choose to ignore it. Strangely enough, though, they seem quite willing to ferret out non-existent ties between progressive protests and George Soros, ANSWER, the International Workers of the World, and the Global Communist Conspiracy to Bring America To Its Knees, and publicize those alleged connections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renaissance Man Donating Member (420 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
14. There would be outrage...
...but not to this extent.

Birthers, teabaggers, and these townhall disruptors share one common trait -- they're not afraid of being identified with lynchmob mentality. President Obama's race only makes their actions more egregious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JitterbugPerfume Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
15. they pulled some rank shit on
Edited on Tue Aug-04-09 01:49 PM by JitterbugPerfume
Clinton and John Kerry too .

They just hate liberal Democrats


And they hate black liberal Democrats with a special vengence.They don't even consider Obama's presidency legitimate, and that is a brand new low.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CountAllVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
16. from what I've seen
the answer is yes. They are using all of their bullshit "talking points" to cover up their racism. I think they are doing a very poor job of covering up who they really are and what their actual intentions are as well.

These people are a bunch of sick racist SOBs and I have zero respect for them.

:kick:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarge43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
18. Yeah there would be.
The night riders would stir up other 'outrages', re Bill and Hillary Clinton.

However, this round is especially virulent because of the bigotry. They have nothing to offer except hate and fear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
19. Though there is a racist element present in some of what we're seeing,
I think this has as much or more to do with opposing ideologies and desperation. We hate them. They hate us. And, they hate us more because we're commie pinko libruls. The media and the government have us so polarized that we are on the verge of a civil war or a revolution or both. Sooner or later, something is going to spark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
20. Hillary yes, Biden, maybe not.
I think they would be just as upset about taking orders from the first lesbian President.

;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
22. No, but there would be some. Angry whites tend to view any democrat with suspicion. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lpbk2713 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
23. Obama's heritage adds more nuts to the fruitcake.



Particularly when they can always hide behind the anonymity of their keyboard.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abelenkpe2 Donating Member (274 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
24. Yes
There would be just a much rage. If Hillary had won you would see a ton of sexist comments. If a white man had won you'd see something else equally nasty, but not so much racist commentary. That would still be hidden in the ugly underbelly of conservatives. So I thank our president for being half white and half black. It helps show the republicans for what they truly are: a bunch of crazy bigots. As long as they continue to spew racist commentary they will continue to alienate voters.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
25. This thread is a wonderful way to explore all of the creative ways white folks...
do their best to avoid calling other white folks racist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chovexani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. "I don't see color!!!1"
They keep it up and I might just have BINGO again!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. BWHAHAHAHAHAHA!
:rofl::rofl::rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AspenRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #29
65. *snort*
"BINGO"

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liquorice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #25
49. So anyone who doesn't agree that the ferocity of the rethug attacks on
Obama are due to racism are just white people trying to cover for other racist white people? Wow. That is messed up. Talk about prejudice!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chovexani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #49
52. BINGO!
Edited on Tue Aug-04-09 02:19 PM by Chovexani
whoop there it is!! I win!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liquorice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #52
53. Are you saying I'm defending racists?? What do you mean by bingo? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #25
51. also a perfect way for those who feel a need to prove how UBER-liberal and unprejudiced they think
they are.

You really don't think this crap would be this bad if it was Hillary?

REALLY?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudToBeBlueInRhody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
26. 1993/1994 was pretty bad
They started crying that Clinton didn't get a majority vote and calling him illegitimate, that Janet Reno murdered the children of Waco, and then they started blowing up government buildings you know........which will probably start soon with the way things are going with these assholes. The move then was not to storm town halls, but to take up arms, move to the woods, and wait for the "gub'ment to come get 'em".

The fact Obama is black makes them insane, but make no mistake about it, the fact he's a Democrat and therefore a "librul, Amurica hatin' socialist commie" is the reason for the sudden anger at the "people in charge". They didn't give a shit for the last eight years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chovexani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
28. Of course not
What a stupid question. Only the most clueless would have any doubt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
30. They were pretty outraged the entire time Clinton was President.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. THAT'S cuz he had all dem culud folk up dey in da WHITE HOUSE!!!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #33
44. (ahem) That's "in da Whizzle Hizzle" to you, please...
Thanks, carry on.

:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chovexani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #44
59. ...
:spray:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #30
36. Outraged? Yes. Forming mobs? Not so much.
Maybe I should have framed my OP a bit better. Were these people forming mobs, taking to the streets, disrupting the process, etc when Clinton was President?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. I remember lots of militias forming.
nt

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liquorice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #38
41. I do too. They were in a blind rage that only escalated as the economy got better. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
99 Percent Sure Donating Member (355 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
31. Well, they gave Billy Jeff hell too, remember? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liquorice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
37. I believe they would go just as crazy. I mean, they impeached Clinton! How
much worse could it be! They were constantly saying Clinton was illegitimate, a criminal who killed his friends, etc. They had a big conspiracy that Blythe wasn't Clinton's real father, and I can't remember the rest, but it somehow meant he was an illegitimate president. It was horrible, and it doesn't surprise that they're acting this way now either. If Hillary were president, they would also be in a full-out frenzy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
39. I think Hillary would have gotten a lot, too
for similar reasons - these people get absolutely crazy if someone other than a white man is in charge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr. Sparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
42. I would think so because it is an fake outrage.
Edited on Tue Aug-04-09 01:58 PM by Mr. Sparkle
remember the whole vince foster thing? These screwballs will try and find anything that tries to be -little any Democratic President.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bcronos Donating Member (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
43. Racism exists only in your mind...
Edited on Tue Aug-04-09 02:02 PM by bcronos
So when people disrupt congressional town hall meetings to express their anger at the Federal Government for trying to take over our Health Care system, it's because they're all secretly members of the KKK? To describe people passionately exercising their rights, and yes, getting angry, as racist because they disagree with a President who happens to be black, says a lot more about the accusers than the accused.

Mobs, thugs, assholes? Always with the childish name calling and racist accusations, never an intelligent, factual discussion. Can you please give some examples of racist remarks made by these people? They certainty didn't make it to the news, so unless you were actually there, the racism exists only in your mind.

And don't the forum rules prohibit broad-brush, bigoted statements?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #43
45. Oh you're a cute one!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
47. If Obama were white, they'd be going with the one about the gay lover in the White House
. . . or some other story I "learn" about while standing the fast check line at the supermarket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
48. If bush had been black would we have attacked him as much or been called racist if we did?
People from both sides attack the opposition quite harshly, Obama is no do different and it would not matter whether he was white or black.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluerthanblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #48
66. beg to differ...
imo and experience, there are some among us who likely would have been less likely to attack him on some issues and yes we would have been called racist for attacking him on most issues.

Questioning his birth and creating this whole fantasy about his being a terrorist and the whole theory about the announcements in the newspapers being planted some...47yrs ago??? No, that not only wouldn't have happened to Bush, it wouldn't have happened to Clinton. Something especially arrogant, ugly, and deviant was unleashed with the selection of 2000.(or rekindled?)

The reality is that racism is alive and kicking in this nation, and angry and intolerant people thrive on fear and control, something the Republican Party seems full of these days.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLAprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
50. We'd see everything but the "Birthers"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidneyCarton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
55. In a word, no.
This issue has gained mileage because it can draw on deep-seated racism throughout our nation. I am waiting for the day that one of these "birthers" finally has their meltdown and just starts screaming on national tv calling the President the n-word. When that happens, and from the looks of Orly Taitz yesterday, it may not be far off, that footage should be shown to everyone as proof that in the end, the "birthers" are nothing but a group of deranged racists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rocknrule Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
56. If he were white, they sure as hell wouldn't be calling him a Muslim
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LanternWaste Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
57. Judging by the DU Primary wars alone, I would hazard a guess...
Judging by the DU primary wars alone, I would hazard a guess... "Yes."

That same level of hatred and vitriol you may not have seen during the 1990's was alive, and well, and kicking in and out from all sides last year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Autumn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
58. Yes
he's a Democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donald Ian Rankin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
60. Evidence suggests yes.
Edited on Tue Aug-04-09 04:49 PM by Donald Ian Rankin
We don't have to guess. We can look, to see what the reactions to the last two Democratic presidents - both white - was. And the answer is that, yes, a great many people are spectacularly and irrationally hostile to any Democratic president, black or white.

More generally, a great many people are spectacularly hostile to any US president from either party, although I feel there were better reasons to be hostile to the last few Republicans.

I don't know for sure whether there was as much, more or less hatred for Clinton or Carter than for Obama, but trying to measure that is the sensible way to answer this question?

Why make guesses about what people "would" do, when we can see what they did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mamaleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
61. Of course they would be just as obnoxious and mean spirited.
The GOP firmly stands against anything anyone with a D next to their name does. A cure for cancer could be found, but a Rethug would find a way to bash it if it turned out the discovery was made by a supporter of a Democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
62. Yes, but about some other made-up shit. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
63. No. Not to this extent. The racism is plain for all to see and it's
even uglier than what the RW nutjobs did to the Clintons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
64. I think there would, to be honest
Certainly some of the anti-Obama stuff is racist, but those people would find some way to rationalize their racism into a dislike of any Democratic president since Dems get most of the black vote. To be honest, the BS does not seem all that different to me from that directed at the Clinton administration. Not exactly the same, just not all that different.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quickesst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
67. Wow....
...it's like for some democrats 9/11 and Bush's eight year reign of war and terror never happened, and it's just like the nineties. Sure racism is involved, but right now, according to another thread, you can only find three states that are solidly red (and they're not in the south, so sorry to disappoint so many). Thinking logically, and taking into account that what's left of the far-right repug party has transformed into another, more violent and insane species,(note the gains Obama has made in red state voters) any president with a D after his name would be facing the same batshit crazies that Obama is. The blatant racism is just topping on the cake for them. My opinion. Thanks.
quickesst
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
68. niether in the RW or here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Lioness Priyanka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
69. as far as i remember bill clinton wasnt black, they would find some other
"reason"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DailyGrind51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
70. The President needs to show more "outrage" at these obstructionists!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
71. I have no doubt that it has added to it
There are a lot of other bigot factors at work here. Part of it is xenophobia and part of it is Islamophobia (he's a secret Muslin, remember).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
72. i can't believe the level of denial displayed here. the OP is right on. and it's worse than that...
the Glenn Becks of the world are being ignored. if Beck were a black man spewing his brand of incitement toward a white president he'd be in jail faster than you could say 'institutionalized racism.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FatDave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
73. It's a complicated question.
Thinking back to '93, it seems to me the biggest difference this time around is that the crazies are getting mainstream attention and coverage. I don't think that's necessarily a bad thing. Shine a light on these scumbags and let the world see that the right is a bunch of fucking lunatics.

Now certainly, racism is increasing the intensity in some of these people. When they get to really frothing and spitting, maybe that's the racism coming to the surface.

But as long as we're running questions by the "what if" machine, I've got another one: What if Alan Keyes was president? These very same people would likely be perfectly happy, and they'd probably be accusing white democrats of being racists for opposing him.

So yes, racism is surely a component of the right's fervor, but I think we may tend to overstate its magnitude. After all, they did pull the exact same shit with Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HelenWheels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
75. Yes,they'd find something - they spent millions on Clinton
trying to find something and all they could find was a blowjob.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SmileyRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
76. Not THIS outrage but yes they'd have outrage.
Remember Big Dog was a rich white man and they were OUTRAGED that Hillary wore a headband (which is, I gather, proof to a nutjob that she's total lesbo) :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC