Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

San Diego’s Union Tribune attacks city workers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 03:09 AM
Original message
San Diego’s Union Tribune attacks city workers
The Union Tribune has recently published the results of its investigation of the San Diego city payroll. (City’s payroll surged in ’08)...

The overall tone of the article is calculated to induce in the reader a sense of outrage...The newspaper strives to convey the impression that the Republican mayor of the city is unwilling or unable to slash budgets, while the unions are running amok accumulating scandalous perks for their members....The article is peppered with language that is meant to suggest a conspiracy going on behind the back of taxpayers: “What’s not usually mentioned are special negotiated payouts that are often buried deep inside dense union contracts..."

The Tribune quotes Michael Kolb, director of the National Public Employer Labor Relations Association, “They (city workers) have so many extra premiums that you can’t just look at an hourly rate.” The premiums admitted by Kolb are holidays and overtime. Is this what an extensive “investigative” report has discovered in the middle of an economic crisis?

With what intention does the Union Tribune make these arguments? The paper perhaps hopes to persuade a section of middle class people and even more backward workers to demand that city workers give up altogether “unusual benefits” that are already being eroded. In other words, the situation for working people would supposedly be better if they all conceded their overtime, paid holidays and benefits. This is the sort of political climate the paper strives to foster.

But the economic crisis was not caused by workers who cash in their vacation and work overtime. Nor will it be fixed by removing these “excesses.” The economic crisis is of a global and systemic nature.

The underlying assumption of the article, that there is something peculiarly wrong in San Diego because of the undue power and benefits of city workers, is belied by the global reach of the crisis, which is decimating jobs and services everywhere with little regard for geographic peculiarities. It is not an accident that the press is playing a similarly despicable role in the ongoing strike of the Toronto city workers (See “What is behind the media’s venomous attack on striking Toronto city workers”).

Judging by the online responses to the article, the readership of the paper seems to have responded very unfavorably to the series, and rightly so...

The capitalist class and its representatives necessarily traffic in slander and innuendos. From a rotten social position can only flow rotten arguments. But in the case of the San Diego newspaper the process is embarrassingly direct. The Union Tribune was in fact recently purchased by Platinum Equity, a merger and acquisition company. It is exactly these kinds of outfits, the finance section of the capitalist class that is most responsible for the economic crisis. The Union Tribune’s hatchet job exposes most of all, the political bankruptcy of the class it seeks to defend.

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2009/jul2009/sand-j29.shtml




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 05:44 AM
Response to Original message
1. okay ... here's one way to start to cut costs ...
if you voted Republican, give up your vacation and sick day reimbursement, be the people who work on "holidays" with no extra compensation, give up your health care coverage, your overtime differential ... you know, all those special perks ...

and then, if you are all for it after a few months of doing so, ask Dems to do the same thing ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heidi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 06:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. Kick.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 07:12 AM
Response to Original message
3. Do you have a link to a credible source? WSWS is not a reliable source.
The story may be true. The story may not be true. We can't tell because you are citing to a source that is about as reliable as stormfront.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heidi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 07:20 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Here are some more mainstream links:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 07:43 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. After reading those articles, it looks like the complaints are misguided.
Statistical anomalies seem to make up the bulk of the pay increases, such as personnel getting a new, more responsible position within the city which calls for more pay, or scheduled increases due to gaining both experience and/or seniority.


The curve denoting the rate of increase will flatten out considerably as those data points will not be repeated in the next sampling.

Much manufactured outrage about very little actually, they are trying to drum up a public outcry to sell their paper to a changing demographic that doesn't read newspapers much anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. There is a growing litany of these kinds of complaints up and down the state
Not only at the current workforce but retirees as well. Some claim its being orchestrated. Regardless public employees and their pensions are being targeted and with the long term shortfall in revenue are easy targets. Add to that the massive losses at CALPERS which the various governments and agencies will have to make up. At a minimum I expect caps and a forced move to defined contribution retirement plans for the future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. of course it's being orchestrated. it's standard operating procedure.
Edited on Wed Jul-29-09 12:55 PM by Hannah Bell
every time there's a downturn; lay people off, tell them the crisis is their fault for being too greedy & over-compensated.

meanwhile, raise compensation for elites.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #4
12. Is That a Gannet Paper, By Any Chance?
Our Gannet paper has twice, in the last six months, published the entire payroll database of our county schools.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 07:26 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. So what do you consider reliable?

The WSJ?

The Chamber of Commerce newsletter?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 07:34 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Anything other than WSWS
which claims that the United Steel Workers union and the Democratic Party are a criminal conspiracy to destroy the working class.

:silly: :crazy: :silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 08:13 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. I'd say they were spot on.

The leadership of the major unions are scabs and have more in common with the capitalist than they do their membership. As per the party, witness the union crushing provisions of the auto bailout, witness the pathetic effort on card check.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Okey Dokey
:silly: :crazy: :silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
10. At least WSWS linked to the article they're referring to so people can make up their own minds
K&U

:kick:

http://www3.signonsandiego.com/stories/2009/jun/28/1n28payone135428/

WSWS does not dispute the numbers presented by the U-T. Note that 13% of people on the payroll are now making more than $100,000 per year plus awesome benefits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. try the full picture:
Edited on Wed Jul-29-09 12:53 PM by Hannah Bell
http://www3.signonsandiego.com/photos/2009/jun/28/44980/

Total employees down 1%, 3%, 4%, 2% 2004-2007

Total compensation up 2%, <1%, -3%, <1% for the same years.


total employees 2004-2008 = down

total compensation = < inflation rate for the same period.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-30-09 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. That's better than I did between 2004 and 2008 in the private sector
I recently quit my job due to lack of pay raises. I found one that pays better, much closer to home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
13. kick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC