Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

matthews and buchanan and karen finney on palin

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-27-09 04:13 PM
Original message
matthews and buchanan and karen finney on palin
m$nbc everyone is talking simultaneously ........

pat says the media reported that the down syndrome baby was actually bristols

matthews asked who reported that the nytimes? washington post?

buchanan said mike barnicle told him about it....you can't make this shit up........back to the SyFy channel or maybe i'm already there..:freak: :freak: :freak: :freak: :freak: :freak: :freak: :freak: :freak: :freak:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-27-09 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. The parentage of the Palins' fifth child is every bit as legitimate a subject of debate
As is Obama's birth certificate. Try that one out on your tin-foil friends and enjoy the little squib-like pop of their tiny brains on overload.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
csziggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-27-09 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. As soon as Matthews said "Patrick" would be on, I changed the channel
I refuse to watch that racist prick any more. He was horrid before, now he is unbearable.

Seeing what they were talking about maybe I missed a real gem there! I swear Patrick Buchanan used include at least a few facts in his diatribes. Now it seems he is only taking in rumor and innuendo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rvablue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-27-09 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Good and I hope everyone else does the same. As long as people keep
giving the show ratings while Buchanan is running his racist mouth, they have no reason to toss him.

If the ratings go down on the days he is on, Tweety will get the message soon enough!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
csziggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-27-09 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I'm tempted to email Matthews and any other MSNBC host
Every single time Buchanan shows up on their programs and let them know I changed the channel. I can honestly express my disappointment that I am missing the other parts of their shows, but refuse to watch a racist uninformed jerk. Maybe after they get a few dozen emails of that sort, they will get the point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-27-09 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. The media NEVER reported that Trig was Bristol's;
that's just another one of those "rumors" that's out there. Given the fact that Sarah supposedly finished her speech in Texas after her water broke, raced back to Alaska, then drove all the way from Anchorage to Wasilla (an hour's drive) to give birth, and NO ONE has seen a birth certificate (oops), it's no wonder that questions arose.

BUT it was never reported in the media, only some bloggers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-27-09 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. So the question still remains, what the F8ck was Palin talking about?
She made the claim that the media "makes stuff up", she needs to defend it.

Was she talking about Faux, who does make stuff up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErinBerin84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-27-09 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
5. I know, it's funny how that question is rarely asked
I think that the only somewhat mainstream blogger who ever reported on the "rumor" (that a rumor was out there) was Andrew Sullivan, but that's it. So freaking what, I saw many mainstream outlets get Obama's background WRONG at the beginning of the campaign, Katie Couric had a segment where they reported on someone who claimed to have attended a madrassa with Obama, which they later had to retract. I think Palin thinks that the fact that other news orgs may have ASKED about the rumor is enough to "count"...you know, just like how major news org were investigating to see whether a "whitey" tape existed, etc. Palin doesn't get how the whole media thing works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC