|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Imagevision
![]() |
Fri Jul-17-09 01:20 AM Original message |
Fox News gets okay to misinform public, court ruling |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo
![]() |
Fri Jul-17-09 01:32 AM Response to Original message |
1. As shitacular as fox news is, I'm certainly not interested in the government telling the media... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imagevision
![]() |
Fri Jul-17-09 01:34 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. the government telling the media...? but wasn't the Pentagon dictating what comes out of Iraq for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo
![]() |
Fri Jul-17-09 01:37 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Yes, and I'm against that as well. Durr. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Fri Jul-17-09 07:10 AM Response to Reply #1 |
25. So, you're in favor of the media telling reporters to lie with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lefthandedlefty
![]() |
Fri Jul-17-09 07:47 AM Response to Reply #1 |
31. Wasn`t Bill Clinton impeached for lying about getting a blowjob? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raineyb
![]() |
Sun Jul-19-09 03:49 PM Response to Reply #1 |
37. The government licenses the airwaves as it belongs to the public and is supposed to serve |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stuball111
![]() |
Fri Jul-17-09 01:42 AM Response to Original message |
4. 1st amendment needs an overhaul... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo
![]() |
Fri Jul-17-09 01:50 AM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Thanks for your help paving the road to hell. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stuball111
![]() |
Fri Jul-17-09 02:04 AM Response to Reply #5 |
7. Just a rant.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo
![]() |
Fri Jul-17-09 02:12 AM Response to Reply #7 |
8. :) Bugs the hell out of me too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unblock
![]() |
Fri Jul-17-09 06:33 AM Response to Reply #4 |
13. false advertising is already illegal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ControlledDemolition
![]() |
Fri Jul-17-09 01:59 AM Response to Original message |
6. Unfortunately the MSM hasn't needed a ruling from the supreme court to misinform us for a long time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans
![]() |
Fri Jul-17-09 02:57 AM Response to Original message |
9. doesn't "false advertising" come into play at all? i mean, they *do* |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unblock
![]() |
Fri Jul-17-09 06:34 AM Response to Reply #9 |
14. "news" merely means "topical". it doesn't mean 100% truthful. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoPasaran
![]() |
Fri Jul-17-09 07:17 AM Response to Reply #14 |
26. Speaking of "news" and "topical"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PretzelWarrior
![]() |
Fri Jul-17-09 03:00 AM Response to Original message |
10. the problem with the disintegration of the media market is..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sanity Claws
![]() |
Fri Jul-17-09 06:27 AM Response to Original message |
11. Public airwaves |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
melm00se
![]() |
Fri Jul-17-09 06:43 AM Response to Reply #11 |
18. Foxnews |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sanity Claws
![]() |
Fri Jul-17-09 06:49 AM Response to Reply #18 |
21. Fox local news |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk
![]() |
Fri Jul-17-09 06:30 AM Response to Original message |
12. I'm for disclaimers for today's political shows (because they AREN'T NEWS). |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unblock
![]() |
Fri Jul-17-09 06:40 AM Response to Reply #12 |
16. anyone familiar with the story behind the story knows the "news" NEVER gets it 100% right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk
![]() |
Fri Jul-17-09 06:45 AM Response to Reply #16 |
19. There is no requirement or indication that a disclaimer requires 100% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unblock
![]() |
Fri Jul-17-09 07:21 AM Response to Reply #19 |
27. i like the idea of a disclaimer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk
![]() |
Fri Jul-17-09 07:24 AM Response to Reply #27 |
28. With Fox, aren't you being a little too generous? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unblock
![]() |
Fri Jul-17-09 07:25 AM Response to Reply #28 |
29. i did say "at best", not on average! :) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk
![]() |
Fri Jul-17-09 07:52 AM Response to Reply #29 |
33. Ah, I understand. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raineyb
![]() |
Sun Jul-19-09 03:51 PM Response to Reply #16 |
38. There's a whole heap of difference between not getting something 100% right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KharmaTrain
![]() |
Fri Jul-17-09 06:34 AM Response to Original message |
15. If People Don't Know About Faux By Now... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unblock
![]() |
Fri Jul-17-09 06:42 AM Response to Original message |
17. note that this case is NOT about government coersion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MGKrebs
![]() |
Fri Jul-17-09 06:46 AM Response to Original message |
20. This way, if something like the Fairness Doctrine ever is re-enacted, it wouldn't apply to Fox, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zbdent
![]() |
Fri Jul-17-09 06:49 AM Response to Original message |
22. gee ... bet you'd never hear the names of the judges who ruled FOR LYING |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ganja Ninja
![]() |
Fri Jul-17-09 06:54 AM Response to Original message |
23. Way to go FOX! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jody
![]() |
Fri Jul-17-09 07:07 AM Response to Original message |
24. "nothing illegal about lying, concealing or distorting information" Damn I was hoping to sue and win |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lpbk2713
![]() |
Fri Jul-17-09 07:26 AM Response to Original message |
30. That was February 2003. It was a stacked deck. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L0oniX
![]() |
Fri Jul-17-09 07:52 AM Response to Original message |
32. ...about as fake as wrestling n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Backlash Cometh
![]() |
Fri Jul-17-09 01:20 PM Response to Original message |
34. Let's call us a news source and slander the shit out of everybody. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IcyPeas
![]() |
Sun Jul-19-09 02:24 PM Response to Original message |
35. kicking - this is just wrong! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone
![]() |
Sun Jul-19-09 02:26 PM Response to Original message |
36. rupert murdoch loves to rub the 1st amendment in anyone's face who challenges him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Wed Feb 12th 2025, 12:13 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC