|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
WI_DEM
![]() |
Wed Jul-01-09 02:28 PM Original message |
Wall Street Journal asserts that Franken stole election!? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christa
![]() |
Wed Jul-01-09 02:29 PM Response to Original message |
1. The WSJ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita
![]() |
Wed Jul-01-09 02:30 PM Response to Original message |
2. WSJ has no credibility any more since Ruppert Murdoch's tabloid news |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndyTiedye
![]() |
Wed Jul-01-09 02:33 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. WSJ is Effectively Part of FauxNews Now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea
![]() |
Wed Jul-01-09 02:38 PM Response to Reply #2 |
9. Yep! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blogslut
![]() |
Wed Jul-01-09 02:31 PM Response to Original message |
3. Oh, the irony! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Wed Jul-01-09 03:05 PM Response to Reply #3 |
23. And, is "Whining" fatal? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blogslut
![]() |
Wed Jul-01-09 03:07 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. I guess not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rd_kent
![]() |
Wed Jul-01-09 02:32 PM Response to Original message |
4. Thats right! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xchrom
![]() |
Wed Jul-01-09 02:33 PM Response to Original message |
5. did they write the same thing after the 00 election? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tabbycat31
![]() |
Wed Jul-01-09 03:00 PM Response to Reply #5 |
20. what about the 2004 election? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DJ13
![]() |
Wed Jul-01-09 02:34 PM Response to Original message |
7. How soon they forget |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
givemebackmycountry
![]() |
Wed Jul-01-09 02:35 PM Response to Original message |
8. WSJ - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Amonester
![]() |
Wed Jul-01-09 03:04 PM Response to Reply #8 |
22. Good. But ain't there any recycling bidness there? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Happy Vic
![]() |
Wed Jul-01-09 03:22 PM Response to Reply #8 |
30. Censorship and Hypocrisy fun for you fun for me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
givemebackmycountry
![]() |
Wed Jul-01-09 03:32 PM Response to Reply #30 |
32. Propaganda gets tossed where it belongs - in the trash |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laelth
![]() |
Wed Jul-01-09 08:38 PM Response to Reply #30 |
58. Welcome to DU. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea
![]() |
Wed Jul-01-09 02:40 PM Response to Original message |
10. "gracious concession" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Wed Jul-01-09 03:08 PM Response to Reply #10 |
25. Notice they didn't talk |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea
![]() |
Wed Jul-01-09 03:13 PM Response to Reply #25 |
28. Indeed! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan
![]() |
Wed Jul-01-09 02:41 PM Response to Original message |
11. Who wrote this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea
![]() |
Wed Jul-01-09 02:50 PM Response to Reply #11 |
15. I've got two freaking subscriptions coming to the office... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric J in MN
![]() |
Wed Jul-01-09 03:35 PM Response to Reply #11 |
34. It's an editorial; the official position of the Wall Street Journal... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glitch
![]() |
Wed Jul-01-09 03:57 PM Response to Reply #34 |
40. Anybody with any credibility has long since left the editorial board of the WSJ. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_Tires
![]() |
Wed Jul-01-09 02:41 PM Response to Original message |
12. did anyone expect anything different from the WSJ op-ed page?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric J in MN
![]() |
Wed Jul-01-09 04:16 PM Response to Reply #12 |
47. It's an editorial, not an op-ed. NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DFW
![]() |
Wed Jul-01-09 02:41 PM Response to Original message |
13. Look who owns WSJ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Odin2005
![]() |
Wed Jul-01-09 02:46 PM Response to Original message |
14. One word: MURDOCH! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Commie Pinko Dirtbag
![]() |
Wed Jul-01-09 02:51 PM Response to Original message |
16. Call the... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME
![]() |
Wed Jul-01-09 02:51 PM Response to Original message |
17. It's An Op-Ed. You See Biased Op-Ed's From Each Side In Most Newspapers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric J in MN
![]() |
Wed Jul-01-09 04:02 PM Response to Reply #17 |
43. It's not an Op-Ed. It's an Editorial. The official position of the Wall Street Journal. (NT) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME
![]() |
Wed Jul-01-09 04:21 PM Response to Reply #43 |
48. Dude It Says So Right On The Damn Thing. It's An Op-Ed. Get A Grip. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric J in MN
![]() |
Wed Jul-01-09 04:50 PM Response to Reply #48 |
51. The phrase "op-ed" doesn't appear on that webpage. NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muriel_volestrangler
![]() |
Wed Jul-01-09 04:51 PM Response to Reply #48 |
52. And there's no name atributed to it. It's the paper's official position |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bushmeister0
![]() |
Wed Jul-01-09 02:57 PM Response to Original message |
18. Interesting side note here. NPR canceled all their newspaper subscriptions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Wed Jul-01-09 03:10 PM Response to Reply #18 |
26. Good to know..one more |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric J in MN
![]() |
Wed Jul-01-09 04:04 PM Response to Reply #18 |
44. The exception for the Wall Street Journal is because it's the only major newspaper which charges... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kjackson227
![]() |
Wed Jul-01-09 02:59 PM Response to Original message |
19. neo-con rag |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Wed Jul-01-09 03:01 PM Response to Original message |
21. Rec'd~ No question mark about it..that's what they're asserting! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vinca
![]() |
Wed Jul-01-09 03:12 PM Response to Original message |
27. In the WSJ bizarro world, the guy with the least votes wins. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marmar
![]() |
Wed Jul-01-09 03:13 PM Response to Original message |
29. The WSJ has really gone deep into the Far Right Rabbit Hole of late.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
indigo32
![]() |
Wed Jul-01-09 03:29 PM Response to Original message |
31. they can |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ck4829
![]() |
Wed Jul-01-09 03:34 PM Response to Original message |
33. Unless a person is completely ignorant of Minnesota law, I don't see how anyone can say that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric J in MN
![]() |
Wed Jul-01-09 04:01 PM Response to Reply #33 |
41. Unless Franken conceded. NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hubert Flottz
![]() |
Wed Jul-01-09 03:36 PM Response to Original message |
35. Sore Losermen! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asjr
![]() |
Wed Jul-01-09 03:41 PM Response to Original message |
36. I can remember a time when the WSJ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hubert Flottz
![]() |
Wed Jul-01-09 03:48 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. DAMN... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dpbrown
![]() |
Wed Jul-01-09 03:48 PM Response to Original message |
38. The Wall Street Journal jumps the shark! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian
![]() |
Wed Jul-01-09 03:51 PM Response to Original message |
39. So was Coleman defending HIMSELF in court? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stellabella
![]() |
Wed Jul-01-09 04:02 PM Response to Original message |
42. Project much, Murdoch? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric J in MN
![]() |
Wed Jul-01-09 04:06 PM Response to Reply #42 |
46. Yes, we should be celebrating a well-done recount. NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unblock
![]() |
Wed Jul-01-09 04:06 PM Response to Original message |
45. at least they're consistent, they slammed bush when he and his lawyers stole florida in 2000. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftishBrit
![]() |
Wed Jul-01-09 04:23 PM Response to Original message |
49. 'modern elections don't end after the voters cast their ballots' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muriel_volestrangler
![]() |
Wed Jul-01-09 04:48 PM Response to Original message |
50. Fuck me, that's the official unsigned editorial |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vidar
![]() |
Wed Jul-01-09 06:15 PM Response to Original message |
53. No, wait. Isn't Franken a Republican according to FOXspeak, like Sanford's a Democrat? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Velveteen Ocelot
![]() |
Wed Jul-01-09 06:22 PM Response to Original message |
54. The Wall Street Urinal has achieved maximum suckitude. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orsino
![]() |
Wed Jul-01-09 06:46 PM Response to Original message |
55. WSJ and Bill O'Reilly work for the same boss. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scarletwoman
![]() |
Wed Jul-01-09 07:04 PM Response to Original message |
56. They've conveniently forgotten that after the initial recount -- which counted ONLY those ballots |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zbdent
![]() |
Wed Jul-01-09 07:24 PM Response to Original message |
57. Murdoch's Faux Street Urinal ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo
![]() |
Wed Jul-01-09 08:41 PM Response to Original message |
59. What I take away from this is that the WSJ opinion page is against counting votes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Mon Jul 14th 2025, 02:38 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC