Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Shame: The 'Anti-War' Democrats Who Sold Out

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
laststeamtrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 04:25 AM
Original message
Shame: The 'Anti-War' Democrats Who Sold Out
Shame: The 'Anti-War' Democrats Who Sold Out
By Jeremy Scahill, AlterNet
Posted on June 17, 2009, Printed on June 17, 2009
http://www.alternet.org/story/140715/

In a vote that should go down in recent histories as a day of shame for the Democrats, on Tuesday the House voted to approve another $106 billion dollars for the bloody wars in Iraq and Afghanistan (and increasingly Pakistan). To put a fine point on the interconnection of the iron fist of U.S. militarism and the hidden hand of free market neoliberal economics, the bill included a massive initiative to give the International Monetary Fund billions more in U.S. taxpayer funds.

What once Democrats could argue was "Bush's war," they now officially own. In fact, only five Republicans voted for the supplemental (though overwhelmingly not on the issue of the war funding). Ron Paul, who made clear he was voting against the war, was a notable exception.

This vote has revealed a sobering statistic for the anti-war movement in this country and brought to the surface a broader issue that should give die-hard partisan Democrats who purport to be anti-war reason for serious pause about the actual state of their party. Only 30 Democrats voted against the war funding when it mattered. And these 30 did so in the face of significant threats to their political future from the White House and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. That means that only 30 out of 256 Democrats are willing to stand up to the war and the current president presiding over it. Their names are listed below; I would encourage people to call them and thank them for standing up and voting no when it counted.

Two other Democrats, not expected to vote against the war funding, joined the anti-war Democrats. Brad Sherman and Pete Stark brought the total number of Democratic votes against the supplemental to 32.

Now, there are many Democrats who consistently vote for war funding, including Nancy Pelosi, but not many of them have such little shame that they dare characterize themselves as anti-war. Remember, 221 voted Tuesday in favor of the war funding. But for those who campaign as anti-war and signed pledges not to continue funding war and then vote for billions more for wars they claim to oppose, Tuesday should be remembered as a day of shame and cowardice. Here are the Democrats who voted against war funding when it didn't count and yes (on Tuesday) when it did--and when refusing to do so might have affected them personally: Yvette Clarke, Steve Cohen, Jim Cooper, Jerry Costello, Barney Frank, Luis Gutierrez, Jay Inslee, Steve Kagen, Edward Markey, Doris Matsui, Jim McDermott, George Miller, Grace Napolitano, Richard Neal (MA), James Oberstar, Jan Schakowsky, Mike Thompson, Edolphus Towns, Nydia Velázquez, and Anthony Weiner. These legislators should be called and asked why they voted for war funding they claimed to oppose last month.

<snip>

Under the leadership of Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, the Democratic-controlled Congress has been a house of war. Unfortunately, it is not a house where the war is one of noble Democrats fighting for peace, freedom and democracy against the evil, belligerent Republicans as they advocate and implement policies of preemptive war, torture and the violation of civil liberties. Instead, it is a house void of substantive opposition to the ever-expanding war begun under Bush and escalating under Obama.

<more>

http://www.alternet.org/world/140715/shame%3A_the_%27anti-war%27_democrats_who_sold_out_/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 04:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. I was confident where my rep stood.
Happy to say I was right. Peter Welch voted against war funding when it counted. And he has something to lose by doing so. He was one of Pelosi's fair haired boys when first elected in 2006 and got several plum committee assignments, but he hasn't just gone along to get along. I expected no less of him. Good to know that my faith has not been misplaced. Peter has consistently stood for the right things, from marriage equality to opposing the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laststeamtrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 06:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 06:35 AM
Response to Original message
3. K & R. Every word of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 06:41 AM
Response to Original message
4. And what's the difference between the two parties again?
Certainly not support for war. Just one more example of our two party/same corporate master system of government at work. The military industrial complex is going to get it's oh so profitable (for the few) war on no matter who is nominally in charge in DC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sisters6 Donating Member (351 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 06:44 AM
Response to Original message
5. Yes, it is now Obama's war(s).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 06:49 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. yes they are, and I hate to think that they are also 'our' wars
Edited on Wed Jun-17-09 06:55 AM by G_j
who voted for him.


welcome to DU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sisters6 Donating Member (351 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. so true:-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 06:53 AM
Response to Original message
7. I just mentioned on another thread that I am disgusted that my "progressive anti-war" Rep.
Edited on Wed Jun-17-09 06:53 AM by OmmmSweetOmmm
John Hall voted for it. I was also shocked that Maurice Hinchey, who has consistently voted against war funding, voted for it. Shame on them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 07:11 AM
Response to Original message
8. War mongers, no doubt.
I assume they are listening to military commanders explain what is deemed necessary to avoid an end-game disaster that could last for years/decades.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
9. K & R. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
10. knr
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newtothegame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
11. It's cool...we all made"HISTORY" in November and we have pictures of our ballots to prove it!!!
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orwellian_Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
12. Ain't it something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
14. Tapping Pelosi on the shoulder and swapping smiles."Democrats who switched tapped Pelosi
on the shoulder before walking back to their seats, swapping smiles, as Pelosi studied the lit-up board on the wall that displays the votes.

(...)

The vote was held open as enough Democrats stepped forward to vote for the war money."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/06/16/white-house-wins-on-war-i_n_216526.html









Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
15. Sham "oppositional" party
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 03:04 AM
Response to Original message
16. Fuck Mike Thompson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seen the light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 03:13 AM
Response to Original message
17. The war's fine now that Obama is president
I don't see why people are getting upset over this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC