John Edwards' house is not fit to run for president!!

[Bicoastal]

Why not Edwards' house? Well, we don't know anything about this house's positions on the issues--on Iraq, on health care, or the national deficit. The house has absolutely no experience as an elected official, and seems completely adrift when it comes to campaign finance. Plus the house seems to suffer from a notable lack of charisma, speaks poorly (actually, it doesn't speak at all) and would never appeal to swing state voters and independents. Hell, without an ammendment, I'm not even sure if the Constitution would allow a house onto the ballot--call it prejudice, but it is what it is. In short, the very notion that this house and its supporters seem to think it's qualified to be the nation's commander-and-chief is absurd, to say the least.

I for one would never, ever, NEVER vote for John Edwards' house in a million years. Now, when Al Gore's solar-powered condo finally decides runs for president, I'll be interested.

[mr_hat]

1. But for single-issue voters - such as I -

the kitchen kills. It has *my* vote, the rest of the house notwithstanding.

[hughee99]

2. I don't believe his house is old enough to run. n/t

[SaveOurDemocracy]

3. LOLLLLLLLL....

....reminds me of Roseanne Roseannadanna. ... nevermind

[Horse with no Name]

4. But the clincher is

I heard his house was a lesbian.
That will totally kill it's chances.:eyes:

[NNadir]

5. The house is not a lesbian.

It may be bi however.

It has a relationship with both males and females.

[stray cat]

6. Is the house a populist who speaks equal opportunity for all Americans?

My fear is the house is benefiting from the work and money of other Americans. I think it has taken advantage of Edward's competence/success as a lawyer. I also think it is secretly employed by the right wing pundits to try to neutralize Edwards on the issue that scares repubs the most - class inequality!

[Horse with no Name]

7. Considering the story broke on Drudge

I would say you are 100% correct!