Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Most Dangerous Game

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 08:09 AM
Original message
The Most Dangerous Game


Judge Sonia Sotomayor made brief remarks after President Barack Obama announced that she is his choice to replace retiring Justice David Souter on the Supreme Court. (Photo: Getty images)

The Most Dangerous Game
By William Rivers Pitt
t r u t h o u t | Columnist

Friday 29 May 2009

It seemed to me that I had barely reached the Court when people were trying to get me off.

- Justice William O. Douglas


Rush Limbaugh announced on his radio show that President Obama nominated a racist by tapping Judge Sonia Sotomayor to replace Justice David Souter on the Supreme Court. Sen. Jim Inhofe (R-Oklahoma) released a statement questioning Sotomayor's ability to "rule fairly without undue influence from her own personal race, gender, or political preferences." Newt Gingrich and Karl Rove have been Twittering their questionable brains out over the last couple of days reasserting the "racist" accusation.

The charges stem from a 2003 case Judge Sotomayor ruled on, Ricci v. DeStefano, a race discrimination case in which Sotomayor decided against white firefighters. But, as Slate's Richard Thompson Ford explained in a recent article, the firefighter's claim was rejected "because the test violated Title VII, the federal civil rights law that prevents discrimination in employment. Title VII requires employers to consider the racial impact of their hiring and promotion procedures in order to prevent discrimination that's inadvertent as well as intentional. Ricci's claim is that the city's effort to comply with Title VII is itself race discrimination (under the 14th Amendment to the Constitution and under Title VII itself). This argument would undermine an important part of modern civil rights law."

So, there's that. Beyond the cries of racism, other voices from the right have contended Obama's high court nominee is a liberal activist, a judicial legislator and someone maybe not quite bright enough to sit on the bench.

Needless to say, it's on.

Even the calmest, most deliberate, most awesomely bi-partisan Supreme Court nomination process one can possibly imagine would still be an exercise in bedlam for Washington, DC, politicos and the media. All the oxygen in the city gets sucked into the process, and until the issue is settled, the noise of it has a way of drowning most everything else out. In its worst iteration, the nomination process can level careers, paradigms and whatever else stands in its path. Two such, the failed nomination of Robert Bork and the successful nomination of Clarence Thomas, left behind a residue of resentment and spite that nobody has been able to scrub off the walls to this day.

Before the nomination of Judge Sotomayor, lots of people were expecting President Obama to replace Justice Souter with someone virtually identical to Justice Souter: moderate, even-tempered, contemplative, and above all else, inoffensive to as much of the galaxy of interested interest groups as could be managed. Instead, Mr. Obama nominated someone moderate, even-tempered, contemplative, profoundly experienced, and above all else, guaranteed to hyperactivate a certain segment of those interested interests while putting the Republican Party in an almost inescapable bind.

A New York Times editorial from Wednesday nicely captured the essential reality of the Sotomayor nomination. "President Obama seems to have made an inspired choice in picking Judge Sonia Sotomayor for the Supreme Court," wrote the Times. "She has an impressive judicial record, a stellar academic background and a compelling life story. Judge Sotomayor would also be a trailblazing figure in the mold of Thurgood Marshall, becoming the first member of the nation's large and growing but still under-represented Hispanic population to serve on the court. Based on what we know now, the Senate should confirm her so she can join the court when it begins its new term in October."

The Republican right-wing's campaign of resistance settled into a predictable pattern almost immediately after the announcement. While those voicing opposition to Judge Sotomayor claimed to be surprised and disappointed that Obama chose such a "controversial" nominee, the truth is they've been suiting up for weeks to fight whomever finally got the nod. Their attacks were triggered automatically and would have come no matter what; if Mr. Obama had nominated Jesus of Nazareth to replace Justice Souter, the GOP would now be denouncing Him for favoring a socialist welfare state because He gave away loaves and fishes and circumvented the insurance industry when He raised Lazarus from the dead.

The rest: http://www.truthout.org/052909J
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. Strange how this works...
"...All the oxygen in the city gets sucked into the process..."

Supreme Court nominees seem to replace all other news stories.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
2. The closer I watch, the brighter this Obama chap looks
The GOP & their sponsors have got to be nervous wrecks, being beaten at this politics game by someone who is also actually accomplishing things the majority of American want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
3. K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
4. good piece Will
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
5. Funny how only white guys are neutral
As a white guy myself, I think it's great how my white-guyness renders me completely immune to that "undue influence" which inevitably afflicts the sadly non-white and non-guy segments of the population. It's great having that Olympian detachment which will forever elude someone like Sotomayor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcadian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
6. Man
Man is the most dangerous game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
7. Wedge issues....
they can be used against you too, GOP bitches!

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ron Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
8. It's TV, and the 24-hour news cycle.
Without the corporate media to feed, this shit would not be an issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
9. Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
10. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 09th 2020, 06:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC