Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

There Are Four Lights! : Torture and Star Trek..

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 03:33 PM
Original message
There Are Four Lights! : Torture and Star Trek..
http://www.slate.com/id/2217905/

Nestled within J.J. Abrams' new Star Trek movie is a standard Hollywood torture scene. Nero, the Romulan antagonist, straps Capt. Pike of the Enterprise to a futuristic hospital gurney and demands secret defense codes. Naturally, Pike refuses. So—in a nod to Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan—Nero forces a mind-control insect down the captain's throat as he stoically recites his name, rank, and serial number. Torture, here, is routine—not an ethical atrocity but an item on the blockbuster checklist—and predictable: The captain has the information his interrogator needs, but, as long as he's in his right mind, he's able to resist divulging it.


It's too bad Abrams didn't look deeper into the Star Trek canon for inspiration. There is a remarkable depiction of torture in Star Trek: The Next Generation, one that is both more sophisticated than the Capt. Pike scenario and more pertinent to current affairs than the ticking-time-bomb set pieces of 24. In an episode from the series' sixth season, Capt. Picard embarks on a mission to destroy a biological weapon and is taken prisoner by a hostile alien race, the Cardassians. Believing that Picard is privy to strategic military secrets, the Cardassians inject him with a truth serum. When this technique fails to produce information, the Cardassians string up their captive in a stress position, strip him naked, and subject him to extreme physical torment—zapping him with a pain-administering device. For good measure, the lead Cardassian interrogator also devises a test meant to inflict mental anguish: He points four bright lights at Picard and asks him, repeatedly, to say that there are five. (A clear homage to the four-vs.-five-fingers sequence in George Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four.)

Powerful when it aired in 1992, the episode is even more resonant in 2009. When Picard's comrades on the Enterprise learn of Picard's capture, they insist that the Cardassians abide by the terms of a Geneva-like "Solanis Convention." The Cardassians rebuff the request: "The Solanis Convention applies to prisoners of war … will be treated as a terrorist."


{...}

More at the link..

I remember this episode vividly, often Star Trek was an investigation of morality and this particular episode was one of the best of that kind of ST screenplay.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Maru Kitteh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. I remember that episode VERY well. It was extraordinary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. "Chain of Command", season 6. At the time, some derided it as being a semi-ripoff of
"The Best of Both Worlds". I'm not entirely sure why...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomThoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. I remember that episode also.
The episode has many meanings to me, including the one you pointed out.

Very moving, and in visionary Star Trek fashion, it speaks the truth I think we all know.

Not to devalue the message in that episode, but it is even more then that for me. It is also a reminder to keep your wits about you. Lots of things can throw you off kilter and try to get you see things differently then they really are.

Got to stay focused and true to the facts of things, and not let the stresses or challenges get you to accept something you know is not true.

I remember a conversation, a person being stressed, not by torture, but by badgering of spin in an argument, he stopped and just said, "I see four lights..."

I remember that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I'm not sure I understand why we have to go to skiffy (sci fi) to get these sorts of discussions
In the media..

Perhaps for the same reason Colbert and Stewart are two of the very few people who can speak truth to power today?

I'm adding Wanda Sykes to that list too..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArbustoBuster Donating Member (956 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #4
29. Nichelle Nichols once pointed that out to Gene Roddenberry.
(For those who aren't Star Trek fans, those are the actress who played Lt. Uhura and the creator of the show.)

Nichols said, "I know what you're doing. You're writing morality plays!"
Roddenberry's response was to smile and quietly say, "Shhhh. They don't know!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
martymar64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 06:09 AM
Response to Reply #29
36. They were morality plays, so was the Twilight Zone
Rod Serling wrote powerful messages about war and paranoia, very relevant topics in the Cold War hysteria of the early 60's. Star Trek was what originally taught me about racism and why it was wrong. The moral lessons taught would've made Aesop proud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. Don't the Cardassians have a show on E?
Sorry, I just couldn't resist..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. That one sailed over my head like a Klingon Bird of Prey..
Whoosh..

I rarely watch TV any more and certainly not E..

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I never watched the show but know about it from watching
the Soup, the show that lampoons all those so-called reality shows...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. I made that joke in the Lounge yesterday
Tough crowd!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
27. I had no idea Bruce Jenner was capable of such things. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheap_Trick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
31. THESE Cardassians are much less reptilian than the ones on E!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
5. Abrams was aiming for a general audience and the masses; populism.
A shallow plot with plenty of nods and winks to all the old series (including 'Enterprise' for some reason) but with nothing of substance.

Remember, Abrams is on record saying he does not like nor understands "Star Trek". Which rather explains why the movie, when not having its characters mock themselves, is full of nudge-nudge wink-wink references to those of us who would see them and we're supposed to glee and squeal except some of us aren't that pathetic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Trek was very much a mixed bag..
At its best it investigated deep moral questions with a clarity not often shown in our culture these days, at its worst it was creaky space opera..

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Oh, the creaky space opera days had me turning the idiot box off too.
I also preferred TOS's approach; it rarely got preachy and one-sided (e.g. "Let that be your last battlefield") but was often open-ended and allowed viewers to think for themselves.

Later TNG (seasons 5 and 6) were excessively preachy and one-sided... the stories biased from the outset. Season 7 was an improvement, but the DS9 and later spinoffs just recycled the same fluff and got even more soap opera.

TOS was action-based, at the behest of the suits because "The Cage" was "too cerebral", but TOS had plenty of thought provoking ideas in them.

The new movie is just eye candy with some self-parody along the same vein of what Star Trek V did to the same characters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. Uh...
Edited on Sun May-10-09 05:25 PM by Orrex
Let that be your Last Battlefield was IMO very preachy, in that it projected a smug (and not at all subtle) vibe of "it's stupid to judge based on skin color."

The mode of preachiness adopted most often by TOS was "look how self-evidently stupid behavior-x is." One great example is in The Savage Curtain when Lincoln meets Uhura and apologizes for having referred to her as a "charming negress." Her response is dismissive: "Why should I be upset by what you said?"

Off the top of my head, I can't think specifically of which TNG season 5/6 episodes were particularly preachy, but perhaps if I saw them again I would recognize them more readily. Overall it sounds like you've decided to accept TOS' style of preachiness while rejecting whatever preachy format you deride in TNG and elsewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. You have to remember the mileu in which TOS came out..
It certainly appears blatantly obvious today but back then racial bigotry was far more accepted than it is today, if ST had been much more subtle it would probably have whizzed right over the heads of the audience it was intended to reach.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WildEyedLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #14
44. Really? I think seasons 1-2 of TNG were the apex of its sanctimonious preachiness
Edited on Mon May-11-09 02:26 PM by WildEyedLiberal
Season 1 was almost unwatchable at times with its preachy reminders of how perfect and flawless human society was in nearly every episode, and its heavy-handed and unsubtle deification of the prime directive. Picard also hadn't yet had the time to develop the richness of character he'd acquire as the show went on, and too often came across as pompous and overly high-minded. There were redeeming episodes, of course, like all the Q ones, and Measure of a Man, but all in all, bleh. Season 3 and onward is where TNG really came into its own and where it stopped feeling the need to shove a creepy Stepford vision of "utopia" down our throats, and Picard got to do more than bloviate about the prime directive.

I have never found the "perfect future" archetype appealing, and early TNG was easily the worst period in Trek history for it. As later TNG proved, the show could be cerebral and optimistic without being insufferably sanctimonious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
10. K&R. This is worthy of having 70 recommends and remaining on the front page!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bushmeister0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
11. The writers of "Chain of Command Pt. 2" based their conclusions of torture
being a futile tactic on the experiences of the British military's use of it against the IRA.

Here's the scene "There are four lights!"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HAMCHShxS9A

Another episode someone should have remembered after 9/11 was "The Drumhead."

http://www.fandango.com/startrek:thenextgeneration:thedrumhead_v182010/summary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Actually I did remember 'The Drumhead'..
But I was a five percenter, the other ninety five percent of Americans wouldn't listen to anything approaching reason at that time.

That was a very lonely time to be a committed liberal humanist, particularly so where I live..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
13. Star Trek TNG S6 E11 Chain of Command II 2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
15. I'm confuzzled. (SPOILER)
in the current movie, cpt. pike DID divulge the necessary codes, otherwise the romulans would not have gotten close enough to start the drill.

so the editorial writer was completely WRONG about the scene, as far as I can tell, when he says that pike refused to divulge info. His stating his name, rank and serial number occur BEFORE the bug is implanted.

unless I watched an alternate version of the movie.


In addition the current movie is timed many years BEFORE the picard next generation incident... so....


I think someone should refrain from using star trek to make a point until one has their geeky facts straight!

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Eh, I haven't seen the movie yet..
But here is the quote that may reduce your confuzzlment..

"The captain has the information his interrogator needs, but, as long as he's in his right mind, he's able to resist divulging it."

After the gets the insect down his throat he is no longer in his right mind, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. ah, well, that clears it up a bit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. Regarding the timeline
It doesn't matter whether the scene takes place before the Picard/Cardassian scene. The critic is suggesting that Abrams should have consulted prior installments in the Trek universe for dramatic reasons, not for inspiration about effective torture methods.

If I read your post correctly, it seems as though you're inferring that Nero would have known a better way to torture based on what had happened in Picard's time. Or am I misreading you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Well, you might not be misreading me (but I wasn't clear enough, either)
actually, what i was thinking doesn't really make any sense...

I had meant if the author was claiming that the antitorture agreements of the federation, as depicted in the New Generation episode, were a basis for saying that torture should have been handled differently, then he was in the wrong space-time as those accords hadn't happened yet.

but I guess the author, on retrospect, was speaking of the roddenberry cultural milleau, and how JJ abrams ignored it, which is a different issue, as you point out.

sorry for the confusion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Clarified that way, it makes sense. Thanks!
And, in that case, you're right in both interpretations. I think the second one (the Roddenberry milieu) is the right one, though.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
21. you're comparing a Cardassian leader with a poor working Romulan miner?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bighughdiehl Donating Member (284 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
25. Anyone remember "Mirror, Mirror"?
That episode of TOS can be found on youtube-here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nWbSXjZlZ7U

That's the one where they get beamed accidentally into a parallel universe. The Federation is an empire
and Spock is a badass with a goatee. Anyway, when I watched it again on youtube, I was struck by how the evil empire in this parallel world has a device called an "agonizer" which seems practically just like a taser. Sadly prescient of what we have become.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. There is such a device in "Dune" also..
Book, movie and the Skiffy channel miniseries (which I thought better than the movie).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
26. I have to say (small spoiler enclosed)
Edited on Sun May-10-09 07:16 PM by JerseygirlCT
the scene in the movie addressed in this made me think of waterboarding. To me, it seemed quite a timely reminder of what was done in our name.


spoiler (slightly):
























You see Pike strapped to a gurney of sorts, you see his head wet, you see water below him and gurgling around. yes, the go to the bug (grossest scene in the movie!), but I thought there was a bit of a message there. Maybe I was just imagining things, though!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. No, I don't think you are imagining things at all..
With the controversy regarding torture that's been swirling around for the last several years someone would have to be totally clueless to put that in there without thinking of our current situation.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #26
38. I was gritting my teeth waiting for the waterboarding.
Who would have thought being forced to swallow a bug that was headed to your brain would have been an easier scene to watch!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #38
48. Oh, that was the most squirmy moment of the movie for me! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InvisibleTouch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
32. Totally off-topic from your post, but...
...I had your sig quote on a bumper sticker ages ago. Once even had a guy knock on my window at a stop light to ask what it meant. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. Great minds think alike, eh?
So what did you tell him?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InvisibleTouch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #33
37. Well, in the 30 seconds or so that I had before the light changed...
...I tried to explain to the guy about an ancient supercontinent during the days of the dinosaurs which broke apart due to tectonic plate movement and continental drift, but I didn't have quite enough time to fit in the whole geology lesson. :) He was nice about it, though, just curious!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cowpunk Donating Member (572 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
34. That's why Bruce Jenner looks so bedraggled
If being tortured by the Cardassians is so bad, try living with them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Delphinus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 05:54 AM
Response to Original message
35. That was a very tough episode to watch.
Not too long ago I saw the original 1984 movie - and realized the connection between the two.

There were many shows I enjoyed, but the one where all the races were looking for something and they each had separate clues and wound up on the planet only to find they were all of the same lineage was very special.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
39. I have to defend Deep Space Nine as the best for confronting
moral issues. I'm thinking of an episode in which Kira is confronted with a Cardassian who she thinks was a sadistic prison guard only to discover he was actually a powerless clerk haunted by what happened in the camps. There was another episode in which Cisko and crew are forced to fight and kill a group of Jem Hadar after both groups crash on a planet. The kicker is that the Jem Hadar are set up to be killed by their master. Cisko and crew are in effect unwilling executioners. The ongoing exploration of the role of religion in politics is pretty unique to this series as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WildEyedLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. Both those episodes were AWESOME.
Edited on Mon May-11-09 02:00 PM by WildEyedLiberal
Also, "In the Pale Moonlight," when Garak and Sisko end up in a very underhanded and morally grey "ends justify the means" conspiracy to get the Romulans to join the war on the Federation's side. I have never forgotten that episode. DS9 was remarkably prescient in its treatment of those issues (it ended its run in 1999, before the specter of terrorism was on anyone's mind).

"Chain of Command" was definitely one of the best TNG episodes, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. I have taught religious education on and off for over 20 years,
and I think forcing junior high + high kids to sit down and watch selected episodes of Deep Space 9 would be very effective!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WildEyedLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #41
43. Totally agreed
Racism - "Far Beyond the Stars"

War crimes - "Duet" (the one with Kira and the Cardassian clerk who made himself look like the war criminal)

The brutality and pointlessness of war - "The Siege of AR-558" (the one where Nog's leg gets blown off)

Damn, that show was pure awesome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #39
42. DS9 was very hit or miss too..
At its best I agree that it was excellent, at its worst it was all but unwatchable space opera sometimes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WildEyedLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #42
45. What aspects of it were "space opera"?
Well first of all I'm never sure what is meant by the term "space opera" - I've seen "space opera" used to refer to any science fiction which involves an epic, galaxy-wide conflict, eg, Star Wars. Sort of like the sci-fi version of heroic fantasy. By that definition, I don't think it's a bad thing - like any genre, it can be done well or poorly. I loved DS9, and other than a few clunky episodes from the early half of the series, I don't think it ever hit a wrong note. I loved the war story arc in the last three seasons and thought it gave Trek an opportunity to explore controversial themes that it really hadn't in the past, with limited exceptions (Chain of Command being a prime example).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #45
46. I watched DS9 quite a bit.. I don't think I've seen all the episodes though..
But I saw quite a few that were made up "technobabble" problems where the frammistat was about to explode or something and only a brave action by a crew member or members averts the disaster at the last moment.

And "apace opera" is akin to "horse opera" and "soap opera", a story where nothing much important really happens.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WildEyedLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. Yeah that sounds fairly typical of the first few seasons
When they introduced the Dominion as a constant, recurring villain, it got awesome. Before the war storyline and all its attendant political skullduggery, it was a much more mixed bag, with a few brilliant episodes (the aforementioned Cardassian war criminal one) and some real stinkers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarge43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #39
50. The DS9 episode "Far Beyond the Stars" was brilliant.
The damage that racism does, not just to its victims, but to everyone. I'll also give it credit for exploring the darker side of the Federation. No human society is an utopia. We'll always have the age old problem of who guards the guardians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sabriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
49. Psst! Don't let this person know Star Trek has redeeming social value!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarge43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
51. That one was difficult to watch
The conclusion was particularly unsettling. Picard admits that at the end he saw five lights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 02:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC