Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Case against Blago: 400 hours of taped calls, 1 million documents

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Are_grits_groceries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 10:17 AM
Original message
Case against Blago: 400 hours of taped calls, 1 million documents
Prosecutors have turned over to Rod Blagojevich's lawyers 400 hours of recorded calls and at least 1 million pages of documents they say are evidence in the massive corruption case against the ex-governor.

And that's just a sliver of it.

There are an additional 300 boxes of documents Blagojevich's lawyers can go through, another 2 million documents involved in the case and at least another 500 hours of recorded phone calls that were deemed not pertinent, lawyers in the case say. The evidence was so voluminous, it came with a 185-page index.

The evidence includes documents from Blagojevich's gubernatorial and campaign offices and documents tied to others in the case, including John Harris, Chris Kelly, Stuart Levine and Lon Monk.

Michael Monico, a lawyer for Kelly, said in a recent court filing that he has received 265 disks containing hundreds of thousands of documents.
http://www.suntimes.com/news/metro/blagojevich/1560226,CST-NWS-blago06.article

Were they keeping up with him since birth? Good grief.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. wow..send that investigative team after the bush folks...
but i'm willing to bet bush covered his tracks a lot better...Blago probably didn't even care...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. They did. Exact same team, against Bush in the Plame affair.
The Bushies were smart enough to cover their tracks and route everything through fall guys like Libby.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
2. So all those who said Fitzgerald had nothing and was just fishing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Yeah, too bad we couldn't dedicate 1/1000 of an effort to investigate War Crimes such as TORTURE ...
instead of a "pay to play" scheme that EVERY DAMN LEGISLATOR at one time or another in his/her career would be found guilty.

I KNOW that if they would have dedicated this much time to ANY (perhaps save for Kucinich) Congress-critter, they would have found law-breaking. The lack of profanity wouldn't make them any less guilty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. He has to be appointed to that job before he can do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
3. Wow, If they taped that much of "you and I" would they find nothing? I smell WITCH HUNT.
p.s. I never liked Fitzpatrick ... IMO, he's having one hell-of-va Opus Dei of middle management Authoritarian THUGs. :tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. It is Fitzgerald not Fitzpatrick.
The least of your errors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. So you've gone from "he's got nothing, he's a loser,"
to "that's way too much evidence, he's a loser."

You're consistent in your inconsistency, at least.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC