|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
WilliamPitt
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 11:49 AM Original message |
"9-II Was An Inside Job" - the sign behind the speakers at the rally |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 11:53 AM Response to Original message |
1. Better Still |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ncrainbowgrrl
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 11:54 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. I totally agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 11:58 AM Response to Reply #2 |
7. There are 1000's of banner out there today |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EvolveOrConvolve
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 05:10 PM Response to Reply #7 |
48. We shouldn't ban them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackRiddler
![]() |
Sun Jan-28-07 12:38 PM Response to Reply #48 |
86. 9/11 is on-topic - this is the 9/11 war |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EvolveOrConvolve
![]() |
Sun Jan-28-07 01:06 PM Response to Reply #86 |
89. Some hare-brained tin-foil conspiracy theory |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackRiddler
![]() |
Sun Jan-28-07 02:45 PM Response to Reply #89 |
91. Yes I can |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EvolveOrConvolve
![]() |
Sun Jan-28-07 06:40 PM Response to Reply #91 |
98. You say you're being logical |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackRiddler
![]() |
Sun Jan-28-07 08:00 PM Response to Reply #98 |
104. None of which you feel you need to detail |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EvolveOrConvolve
![]() |
Sun Jan-28-07 08:12 PM Response to Reply #104 |
105. Nope |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackRiddler
![]() |
Sun Jan-28-07 08:15 PM Response to Reply #105 |
106. Garbage! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zodiak
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:14 AM Response to Reply #105 |
125. I think the other poster is asking for something specific |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mnhtnbb
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 09:28 AM Response to Reply #89 |
121. Just finished reading Kristen Breitweiser's "Wake-Up Call-- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
King Coal
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 12:05 PM Response to Reply #86 |
132. Very interesting. Thanks for posting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofthedial
![]() |
Sun Jan-28-07 06:00 PM Response to Reply #48 |
95. ESPECIALLY |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Smarmie Doofus
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 12:00 PM Original message |
JMHO, also. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberaldemocrat7
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 12:05 PM Response to Original message |
22. George W Bush provoked the 9-11 attacks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Smarmie Doofus
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 12:36 PM Response to Reply #22 |
36. Focus, focus, focus. You may well be correct, but.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud
![]() |
Sun Jan-28-07 01:51 AM Response to Reply #36 |
60. I agree. I went to a protest organized by ANSWER once and they brought up every single lefty cause |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dukkha
![]() |
Sun Jan-28-07 05:30 PM Response to Reply #60 |
93. ah jeez, not the "Free Mumia" again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cui bono
![]() |
Sun Jan-28-07 02:57 AM Response to Reply #22 |
67. And now they're getting ready for another "attack" to justify war with Iran. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imagevision
![]() |
Sun Jan-28-07 10:05 AM Response to Reply #67 |
82. I agree, the second 9-11 Part 2 - Attacking Iran is being drafted as we speak, this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 11:57 AM Response to Reply #1 |
6. And what was one of the insuated reasons why we went to war? 9/11. eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zippy890
![]() |
Sun Jan-28-07 07:03 AM Response to Reply #1 |
74. agreed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ohio2007
![]() |
Sun Jan-28-07 09:36 AM Response to Reply #1 |
80. They didn't have " Check Spelling " ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
INDIA
![]() |
Sun Jan-28-07 12:46 PM Response to Reply #80 |
88. It's spelled "grammar." It's called "irony." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Twist_U_Up
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 11:56 AM Response to Original message |
3. isn't there a forum for these inflammatory threads ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 11:57 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Thank you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 12:04 PM Response to Reply #5 |
18. See post 16 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 12:14 PM Response to Reply #18 |
29. Watch the video |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 11:59 AM Response to Reply #3 |
8. No, threads that diss the 9/11 Truth movement are allowed in GD...n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 12:00 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. Deleted message |
WilliamPitt
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 12:05 PM Response to Reply #8 |
20. See post 16 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear
![]() |
Sun Jan-28-07 01:46 AM Response to Reply #8 |
58. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onecent
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 12:01 PM Response to Reply #3 |
12. Me agree also. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 12:05 PM Response to Reply #12 |
21. See post 16 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 12:04 PM Response to Reply #3 |
16. Am I dissing the movement? Calling them tinfoilers? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 12:16 PM Response to Reply #16 |
32. You have a history |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rman
![]() |
Sun Jan-28-07 06:54 AM Response to Reply #16 |
72. should we dig up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TornadoTN
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 09:09 AM Response to Reply #16 |
115. I guess they didn't have 24 business hours to use spell check |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VTMechEngr
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 05:04 PM Response to Reply #3 |
47. Nutty threads go to the 9/11 forum |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RegimeChange2008
![]() |
Sun Jan-28-07 01:58 AM Response to Reply #47 |
62. I guess you miss the irony in your own signature then? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rman
![]() |
Sun Jan-28-07 06:59 AM Response to Reply #3 |
73. Inflammatory threads get locked. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear
![]() |
Sun Jan-28-07 12:38 PM Response to Reply #73 |
87. :nodding: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
k_jerome
![]() |
Sun Jan-28-07 06:44 PM Response to Reply #73 |
99. amen. nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
npincus
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 11:56 AM Response to Original message |
4. 'Defund the War, Defend America" would be much better |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 12:00 PM Response to Original message |
9. Massive crowd |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LibraLiz1973
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 12:00 PM Response to Original message |
10. Do better next time... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 12:02 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. "That will become the Freeper version of our 'Morans' pic" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Horse with no Name
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 04:49 PM Response to Reply #13 |
45. Now you have gone and done it. And done it good. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 06:35 PM Response to Reply #45 |
51. They would have picked it up and used it themselves! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laurier
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 09:36 PM Response to Reply #13 |
57. Just like "Karl Rove Has Been Indicted" has become the freeper version of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DancingBear
![]() |
Sun Jan-28-07 10:39 AM Response to Reply #13 |
84. No, TruthOut and Jason Leopold are our "Morans" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laurier
![]() |
Sun Jan-28-07 11:23 PM Response to Reply #84 |
109. You're right. They are our "morans" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 12:03 PM Response to Original message |
14. Maybe you should watch this video |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LibraLiz1973
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 12:04 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. I do not believe he intended to insult you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 12:04 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. See post 16. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
puerco-bellies
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 12:05 PM Response to Original message |
19. CNN Just showed the 9-11 was an inside job!! sign!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 12:06 PM Response to Reply #19 |
23. No they didn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LibraLiz1973
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 12:08 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. It's like WWII and 9/11 morphed into one thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
puerco-bellies
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 12:11 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. It was a sign that was two parts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 12:11 PM Response to Original message |
26. Sounds like you're an aspiring editor, Will. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 12:12 PM Response to Original message |
27. One of the issues I have with some of the "marches," is that they are co-opted by people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo
![]() |
Sun Jan-28-07 02:25 AM Response to Reply #27 |
65. mzmolly, did you forget the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 12:13 PM Response to Original message |
28. Were the "I's" Stylized Representations of the WTC Towers Using Roman Numerals? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 12:15 PM Response to Reply #28 |
30. It was on C-Span |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 12:33 PM Response to Reply #30 |
35. Maybe C-SPAN Will Archive the Coverage on Its Site? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Twist_U_Up
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 12:15 PM Response to Reply #28 |
31. No Doubt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 12:17 PM Response to Reply #31 |
33. ..but he's not insulting the 9/11 Truth movement (see post 16)... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 12:26 PM Response to Reply #33 |
34. I'll let his words speak for themself |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 12:49 PM Response to Reply #34 |
37. "I'll let his words speak for themself" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 12:52 PM Response to Reply #37 |
38. I'd rather be a lousy speller |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftchick
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 04:35 PM Response to Reply #38 |
42. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pastiche423
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 05:00 PM Response to Reply #38 |
46. On my! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laurier
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 09:16 PM Response to Reply #38 |
53. Touche. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nam78_two
![]() |
Sun Jan-28-07 02:47 AM Response to Reply #38 |
66. WORD! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Behind the Aegis
![]() |
Sun Jan-28-07 05:56 AM Response to Reply #38 |
68. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear
![]() |
Sun Jan-28-07 06:29 AM Response to Reply #38 |
69. ouch! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mick Knox
![]() |
Sun Jan-28-07 06:32 PM Response to Reply #38 |
97. That's going to leave a mark! LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TornadoTN
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 09:11 AM Response to Reply #38 |
116. Bravo! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftchick
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 04:35 PM Response to Reply #37 |
41. lol! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWatcher
![]() |
Sun Jan-28-07 07:11 AM Response to Reply #37 |
75. "Only a fool follows a fool." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWatcher
![]() |
Sun Jan-28-07 07:22 AM Response to Reply #37 |
77. You should get into the business of addressing your own words |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
twylatharp
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 04:27 PM Response to Original message |
39. I can think of much, much more embarrassing mistakes to make |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laurier
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 09:18 PM Response to Reply #39 |
54. You're quite right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear
![]() |
Sun Jan-28-07 01:50 AM Response to Reply #39 |
59. twyla, what a choreographer. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SOS
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 04:34 PM Response to Original message |
40. It should read: IX-XI |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lilith Velkor
![]() |
Sun Jan-28-07 09:43 AM Response to Reply #40 |
81. IX - XI eram an inside officium! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear
![]() |
Sun Jan-28-07 05:16 PM Response to Reply #40 |
92. Ooh a palindrome! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Octafish
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 04:38 PM Response to Original message |
43. The two "I"s look kinda like the Twin Towers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bucky
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 04:44 PM Response to Original message |
44. Quit feedin' em, Will. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 05:34 PM Response to Original message |
49. Dude, The Typewriter's In On The Conspiracyyyy Mannnnnn. Don't You Get It Bro? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
reprehensor
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 06:33 PM Response to Original message |
50. This picture? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 06:40 PM Response to Original message |
52. Oh no! We've given Bush the idea for 911II! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rex
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 09:23 PM Response to Original message |
55. It reads 'nine - roman numeral number two was an inside job.' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
newsdude
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 09:25 PM Response to Original message |
56. Funny, coming from a "truthout" guy ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
twylatharp
![]() |
Sun Jan-28-07 11:12 PM Response to Reply #56 |
108. Nail .on. head.eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TornadoTN
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 09:12 AM Response to Reply #56 |
117. We should all be protesting 24 business hours, apparently. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bridgit
![]() |
Sun Jan-28-07 01:51 AM Response to Original message |
61. U.S. Army General Says Flight 77 Did Not Hit Pentagon... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donheld
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 06:56 AM Response to Reply #61 |
111. If flight 77 did not go into the Pentagon |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zodiak
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:26 AM Response to Reply #111 |
127. That's begging the question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alittlelark
![]() |
Sun Jan-28-07 02:01 AM Response to Original message |
63. His ink was also substandard.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftstreet
![]() |
Sun Jan-28-07 02:18 AM Response to Original message |
64. Are you in DC? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo
![]() |
Sun Jan-28-07 06:45 AM Response to Original message |
70. You take a Snark Pill tonight, bub? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rman
![]() |
Sun Jan-28-07 06:53 AM Response to Original message |
71. for someone who avoids actually discussing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWatcher
![]() |
Sun Jan-28-07 07:15 AM Response to Reply #71 |
76. It's usually the one's with the biggest mouths that have the biggest problem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cobalt Violet
![]() |
Sun Jan-28-07 07:53 AM Response to Original message |
78. Freedom of Speech is a Bitch ain't it. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cgrindley
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 09:37 AM Response to Reply #78 |
122. If people keep calling her a bitch, there will be trouble |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DancingBear
![]() |
Sun Jan-28-07 09:33 AM Response to Original message |
79. Hey, maybe they were drunk |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WiseButAngrySara
![]() |
Sun Jan-28-07 10:07 AM Response to Original message |
83. What? 111!!!!IIII111 The numbers are letters? OMG. This is series!!111 n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeFree
![]() |
Sun Jan-28-07 11:19 AM Response to Original message |
85. So you do agree? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wildbilln864
![]() |
Sun Jan-28-07 01:22 PM Response to Original message |
90. kicking... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun Jan-28-07 05:55 PM Response to Original message |
94. Deleted message |
Junkdrawer
![]() |
Sun Jan-28-07 06:30 PM Response to Reply #94 |
96. See that kids...another false-flag attack is on the way...time to label... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Feron
![]() |
Sun Jan-28-07 07:04 PM Response to Reply #96 |
102. Well when a "scholar" tells you that the buildings weren't hit by planes or |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer
![]() |
Sun Jan-28-07 07:59 PM Response to Reply #102 |
103. The "fire weaken trusses" theory was the Gold Standard...Until... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Puregonzo1188
![]() |
Sun Jan-28-07 06:49 PM Response to Original message |
100. I was more surprised about the signs behind the stage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oblivious
![]() |
Sun Jan-28-07 06:57 PM Response to Original message |
101. It's kind of sad that this ended up being the biggest thread on the war protest. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
twylatharp
![]() |
Sun Jan-28-07 11:08 PM Response to Reply #101 |
107. but if you think about it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 03:22 AM Response to Reply #107 |
110. Welcome to DU btw :) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donheld
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 06:59 AM Response to Original message |
112. Will, I think some of your responders |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 07:14 AM Response to Reply #112 |
113. Oh for heaven's sake, donheld, what if the signmaker was not American? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DancingBear
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 08:34 AM Response to Reply #112 |
114. Well, his supporters would give him 75 "recommendations" if he copied |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TornadoTN
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 09:14 AM Response to Reply #114 |
119. Isn't that the truth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rman
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 09:14 AM Response to Reply #112 |
118. That's what we need; |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TornadoTN
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 09:17 AM Response to Reply #118 |
120. I'm not even in the movement and I feel his post his post is smacking of elitism |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cgrindley
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:03 AM Response to Reply #120 |
123. That's ridiculous |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
drbtg1
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:13 AM Response to Original message |
124. Wasn't there a time when typewriters did NOT have a "1" key... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JustABozoOnThisBus
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:18 AM Response to Reply #124 |
126. Yes, but we used a lower-case "L" as a one. Not "I". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
drbtg1
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:38 AM Response to Reply #126 |
128. I think the point was... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JustABozoOnThisBus
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 12:04 PM Response to Reply #128 |
131. Thanks, I haven't thought of Dan Quayle in a long time ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zodiak
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:39 AM Response to Original message |
129. The point, apparently, is to denigrate the movement. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nabia2004
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 11:51 AM Response to Original message |
130. Perhaps they ran out of "1" in their Lettering package |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wakemeupwhenitsover
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 12:11 PM Response to Original message |
133. I'm going to lock this at the request |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Fri Jul 01st 2022, 08:47 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC