Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"The charade that took place at Guantanamo Bay would have done Stalin's show trials proud"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Andre II Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 02:28 AM
Original message
"The charade that took place at Guantanamo Bay would have done Stalin's show trials proud"
THE secret agreement that resulted in David Hicks facing only nine more months in prison may do fatal damage to an already discredited system of dealing with terrorism suspects, legal experts say.

The combination of a sentencing deal arranged behind closed doors and the conditions imposed on Hicks, including a year-long gag order and a declaration that he was never tortured, has shown the process to be a political and not legal one, Australian and US observers say.

Robert Richter, QC, one of Australia's most experienced criminal lawyers and a Hicks supporter, said the trial was a sham that had wholly discredited the Pentagon's war-crimes process.

"The charade that took place at Guantanamo Bay would have done Stalin's show trials proud," Mr Richter said in a commentary for The Sunday Age.
http://www.smh.com.au/news/world/trial-would-have-done-stalin-proud--lawyer/2007/04/01/1175366080770.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 03:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. i have a book called POX about Syphilis causing the Megalomaniacs of History..who do that shit, mayb...
he was drunk and stoned enough, long enough to score a hit of syphilis..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jonathan50 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 06:20 AM
Response to Original message
2. A declaration that he was never tortured..
Nothing to see here folks, move along, move along.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 06:23 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I wonder how they got him to sign it. . . . . .
Every supposition is suspect now. There is no way we can trust a word spoken in regard to that facility of the damned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jonathan50 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 07:04 AM
Response to Reply #3
7.  If you want a vision of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face - forever.
-George Orwell
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 06:24 AM
Response to Original message
4. Fuckers.
I hope Hicks spurns the gag order and talks, and talks, and talks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otherlander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 06:33 AM
Response to Original message
5. Once his sentence is over and he's released
what's going to stop him from breaking the gag order?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 06:56 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. He will break it, but the US gov't is only worried about US public opinion.
In the US, the government can claim that Hicks is lying because he admitted that he wasn't tortured at all and that he signed the documents stating to that effect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no safe haven Donating Member (202 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 07:52 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Too late, already on record
Hicks has already documented his and others’ torture at Guantanamo in an affidavit he made last year when he attempted to apply for UK citizenship – so he could get out of Gitmo like four other Britons.

Check it out here:
http://www.abc.net.au/4corners/content/2007/s1887902.htm

The whole process is a sham and a disgrace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
9. Why do you think Bush has that term on his brain, using "show trials" for Democratic investigations?
It's his guilty psychopathology speaking/projecting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC