|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
mod mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-28-09 02:53 PM Original message |
Court Rejects Obama Admin's State Secrets Claim |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Windy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-28-09 02:55 PM Response to Original message |
1. Those cases were started when the Bush administration was in power. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mod mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-28-09 02:57 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. So are you saying that the Obama Admin had to keep the same position? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Supersedeas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-28-09 04:35 PM Response to Reply #2 |
11. at what point can a new Administration effect legal change that we can believe in? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LooseWilly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-28-09 05:10 PM Response to Reply #11 |
18. At a point where it judges |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Supersedeas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-29-09 05:08 PM Response to Reply #18 |
22. that appears to be the case, LW |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hugo_from_TN (895 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-28-09 03:33 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. Wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BR_Parkway (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-28-09 03:58 PM Response to Reply #1 |
8. Not to mention - a court rejection of a flawed argument keeps many |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mod mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-28-09 04:57 PM Response to Reply #8 |
15. The GOP has shown they don't want to work in any way w us so it's worthless |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thereismore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-28-09 02:59 PM Response to Original message |
3. Obama, I love you, but you deserved that one. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skidmore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-28-09 03:01 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. They played out the hand dealt them and established the precedent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mod mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-28-09 03:03 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. This will make Russ Feingold happy as he gave Obama a D over state secrets stance. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
backscatter712 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-28-09 03:41 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. Seconded on that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DevonRex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-28-09 04:46 PM Response to Reply #3 |
14. He got the decision he wanted. Chess... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tbyg52 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-28-09 04:08 PM Response to Original message |
9. Good. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-28-09 04:09 PM Response to Original message |
10. me thinks they knew this would happen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vidar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-28-09 04:41 PM Response to Original message |
12. Good. Obama was dead worong on this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ColbertWatcher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-28-09 04:45 PM Response to Original message |
13. Good. k+r, n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RufusTFirefly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-28-09 05:04 PM Response to Original message |
16. More sniping from the sidelines? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-28-09 05:06 PM Response to Original message |
17. THis could be another calculated move by Obama. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spike89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-28-09 05:32 PM Response to Original message |
19. Invoking presidential authority to end things won't work |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
soryang (642 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-28-09 05:56 PM Response to Original message |
20. Judge Walker ND California already recognized that secrets |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TimesSquareCowboy (222 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-28-09 06:52 PM Response to Original message |
21. The case that established state secrets in the first place turns out to have been |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-29-09 05:10 PM Response to Original message |
23. I missed this yesterday. Thanks for keeping it kciked. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:40 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC