Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. Attorney Scandal... It's about oil. And PORN ?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
madeline_con Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-31-07 07:38 PM
Original message
U.S. Attorney Scandal... It's about oil. And PORN ?
Edited on Sat Mar-31-07 07:41 PM by madeline_con
The Porn Plot Against Prosecutors
March 20, 2007

"... Concerned about wasting the already limited resources at his disposal on a case of dubious value, Charlton hesitated. Despite his misgivings, he assigned the additional prosecutor--a key fact missing from the White House e-mails.

Ward's endless stream of mandates, the source revealed, were a source of frustration to many US Attorneys. "There were countless child obscenity cases crying out to be prosecuted," the source told me, "but Ward wanted to focus on cases involving consenting adults. That's just not a good way of dedicating resources. When you have so many children being harmed, why not allocate your resources towards that?"

Ward's heedless prosecutions of legally available pornography reflected more than his ideology; they also defined his power within the Justice Department. Once Bush began his second term in the White House, Gonzales declared the prosecution of pornography portraying sex acts between consenting adults "one of the top priorities" of his department. He signed off on an FBI headquarters memo that recruited agents for an anti-porn task force. That memo stated that prosecutions would focus particularly on material depicting "bestiality, urination, defecation, as well as sadistic and masochistic behavior." These acts, according to the memo, were most likely to offend local juries."

http://www.thenation.com/doc/20070402/blumenthal


The same story was reported earlier bt another site...

Attorney Says Justice Dept. Sold Same 'Obscene' Material As His Client
By: Mark Kernes
Posted: 8:44 am PST 3-16-2007

TEMPE, Ariz. - AVN noted Wednesday that one of the interesting aspects of the recent Justice Department (DOJ) firing of several U.S. Attorneys was that two of them – Paul Charlton of the District of Arizona and Dan Bogden of the District of Nevada – were canned because they were "unwilling to take good cases" that had been presented to them by the Justice Department's obscenity unit. That unit is currently being run by former U.S. Attorney of Utah Brent Ward.


But as we were examining some of the documents in the one obscenity case that Charlton did file – United States v. Five Star Video, LC, et al – an interesting coincidence leapt out ... and it's one that the Justice Department may have found so embarrassing that Charlton's firing may simply have been another casualty in the cover-up surrounding it.

(snip)


But Five Star isn't the biggest or best-known adult retailer in Arizona. That honor goes to the Castle Boutique, part of the Castle Megastore chain, which currently consists of 19 adult stores in several states.

(snip)


In other words, while U.S. Attorney Paul Charlton was busy indicting Five Star and JM and their employees for interstate transportation of obscene materials – "obscene" under the community standards of the District of Arizona – trustees employed by the U.S. Department of Justice were selling and had sold those exact same titles ... and not just in Arizona, but had also shipped those titles to other Castle stores in Oregon and Washington state.

(snip)

One can only imagine the consternation Charlton must have felt when he received a copy of Hertzberg's motion on or shortly after Aug. 31. Did he immediately call Brent Ward, complaining that he'd been hung out to dry when, after filing obscenity charges that the Bush administration had been pushing him (and other U.S. Attorneys) to do, he finds that government representatives have been selling the indicted materials in another store just a few miles away? Did he tell Ward that, under the official Canons of Ethics, he (Charlton) could hardly argue to a jury, even if the court denied Hertzberg's estoppel motion, that the indicted features violated Arizona's community standards when government agents had been selling them for years?

http://www.avn.com/index_cache.php?Primary_Navigation=Articles&Action=View_Article&Content_ID=285692

(WARNING: The above site contains adult content. MODERATOR, Please remove this post if it is in violation of DU rules.)



It seems the puritanical sex obsessed crowd in D.C. were about to be caught with their pants down and had to "let some people go."

Edited because I can never leave well enuff alone!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
williesgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-31-07 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R - all these assholes make me puke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PuraVidaDreamin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-31-07 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yep- stay away from prosecuting Mark Foley types-
and I'm thinking that Gonzo himself has
many pedophile qualities
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madeline_con Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-31-07 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. The article from "The Nation" said there were
Edited on Sat Mar-31-07 08:07 PM by madeline_con
lots off child pornography cases awating prosecution, but the DOJ seemed hell bent on worrying about consenting adults and what they did. :shrug:

Typos freak me out
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nickster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-31-07 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. Pretty interesting stuff. Wonder if this will come up in the Congressional hearings. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-31-07 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. Reminds me of a story a friend told me....
of being fired as a social worker after he uncovered a child-sex-swap ring (their own kids) of prominent Washington area people.

You barely have to scratch the surface in this town to see the sleaze.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madeline_con Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-31-07 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Oh GAWD...
It's always those who rant the loudest who are in it up to their eyeballs, ever notice that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-31-07 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Yeah, the hookers, drugs, sex clubs, etc....
In DC would shock the shit out of the "good people" in the conservative red states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madeline_con Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-31-07 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Yeh, but they'd be forgiven as soon as they "found Jesus".
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
petepillow Donating Member (590 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-31-07 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. i think that's the same as "found rehab" these days...
nothing cleanses like publicly admitting yourself to "rehab"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-31-07 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
10. Which state was it that just outlawed sex toys?
FL? GA? I can't remember.

I also seem to remember something about this Homeland Security Porn task force some time ago too.

Going to google that and see if I can't jog my memory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-31-07 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I think it was Miss. or Alabama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-31-07 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Operation Predator - DHS/ ICE and aliens and sex
A year ago this week, ICE was formed by combining the investigative and intelligence arms of the former Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) and the U.S. Customs Service, as well as the Federal Protective Service and the Federal Air Marshal Service. By integrating these once-fragmented resources, the Department of Homeland Security not only created the second-largest investigative agency in the Federal government, but it also created a dynamic and innovative new law enforcement organization uniquely and exclusively focused on homeland security—specifically border security, air security, and economic security.

<snip>

Applying a systemic approach to addressing the large number alien absconders, ICE set about prioritizing the most dangerous offenders. We first developed a ''Top Ten'' list with ''the worst of the worst.'' While this standard law enforcement tool was not regularly employed by the legacy INS, it proved to be a tremendous success for ICE. Nine of the original ''Top Ten'' were located and apprehended within the first two weeks, and the tenth was soon confirmed to have left the country.

This initiative revealed that among the criminal subset of the alien absconder population, many have convictions for sexual offenses and, in particular, offenses against children. By law, any non-citizen who commits such a crime is to be deported back to his or her home country. Unfortunately, that wasn't always the case under the INS, as you know. This committee has heard too many terrible stories about alien predators freed to prey upon children again and again.

To address this problem, ICE began to examine Megan's Law directories, matching our immigration databases to Megan's Law databases, and rounding up deportable aliens convicted of sexual crimes against children. Our success rate was astounding, Mr. Chairman, and we quickly came to recognize the awful dimension of the child predator problem. Besides the high number of alien predators, our investigators were unearthing remarkable numbers of child pornographers on the Internet, human smuggling organizations trafficking in children for sexual exploitation, and the relatively new phenomenon of ''sex tourists,'' American citizens who travel to other countries to engage in sex with minors. So we coordinated all, systematically.

As appropriate within ICE's existing jurisdiction, Operation Predator has grown to include U.S. citizens and residents suspected of sex crimes against children. This new approach targets child predators by combining our immigration authorities and our child pornography authorities to merge efforts in a way that had never been done in the past. In a way unforeseeable before the creation of the Department of Homeland Security, ICE is coordinating once fragmented resources and underutilized authorities into a united campaign against those who prey upon our children—drawing on the full range of intelligence, investigative, and detention and removal functions of ICE to target those who exploit children. Protecting children from these ruthless predators is undoubtedly paramount to our homeland security mission.

The results of this initiative are unprecedented in law enforcement. The success of Operation Predator—as measured by the number of child predators ICE has taken off the streets—is a testimony to the tireless work of ICE agents who have embraced the integration of the legacy agencies' legal authorities and used them in new and more effective ways. Since Operation Predator was launched in July 2003, ICE has arrested more than 2,000 child predators. While this is indeed a worldwide enforcement effort, it has a direct impact on the safety of the streets in your local communities, as evident in that nearly 1,300 of these arrests occurred in the nine states represented by the Members of this Subcommittee.

Recognizing the synergies realized through our own merger, we aggressively sought to incorporate and join forces with others in this important effort. ICE is currently working closely with a number of agencies and organizations under Operation Predator. Such cooperation is critical to the success of this initiative, since child predator investigations often cross jurisdictional boundaries and require specialized assistance to help victims overcome the trauma of their abuse. ICE Operation Predator partners include other DHS agencies such as U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP); state and local police departments, the U.S. Postal Inspection Service; the U.S. Department of State Office to Monitor & Combat Trafficking in Persons; NCMEC; Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network (RAINN); INTERPOL; the U.S. Department of Justice; and many others who also provide critical support to the program.

http://commdocs.house.gov/committees/judiciary/hju92347.000/hju92347_0.HTM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-01-07 12:30 AM
Response to Original message
13. Recommended! Here's another Charlton article
re: Representative Renzi:
In September 2006, just weeks before pivotal Congressional midterm elections, Paul Charlton, US Attorney for Arizona, opened a preliminary investigation into Republican Representative Rick Renzi of the state's First Congressional District for an alleged pattern of corruption involving influence-peddling and land deals. Almost immediately, Charlton's name was added to a blacklist of federal prosecutors the White House wanted to force from their jobs. Charlton is someone "we should now consider pushing out," D. Kyle Sampson, Attorney General Alberto Gonzalez's chief of staff, wrote to then White House Counsel Harriet Miers on September 13. In his previously safe Republican district, Renzi had barely held on in the election. On December 7, the White House demanded Charlton's resignation without offering him any explanation


Burning JustUs energy on legal porn is a great strategy to:
1. Make the jebus freeks happy
2. Not harm the porn industry
3. Remove resources from legitimate prosecutions

Check my journal for LAM info. Looks like I'm getting enough on Charlton to start in on him. Thanks for the refs!

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC