Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Looking Forward, I see only two possibilities

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-19-09 11:39 AM
Original message
Looking Forward, I see only two possibilities

The combination of...

A) V.P. Cheney's admissions that he "signed off" on the enhanced interrogation techniques

B) The description of those techniques in the recently released memos

C) The report by the International Red Cross that witnessed the use of those techniques and stated definitively that it was torture


...represents a specific quantity of evidence upon which a decision can be made to either launch an official investigation or not.

If no investigation is launched, I see only two possibilities when looking forward and IMO neither is acceptable.


#1) The Justice Department will require more evidence than that which the combination of A,B and C represents to launch any investigation.

#2) The Justice Department will give up any pretense of equal distribution of justice to all Americans without regard to their social status.



Anyone see a third choice I have overlooked?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Fovea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-19-09 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. Or #3 where we stall and jive
until the international community starts demanding an international tribunal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-19-09 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I mean in regards to domestic investigations, Will Justice not be equal for all Americans or
will the threshold for launching an investigation be so high that none are ever launched?


My post is limited in scope to domestic issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fovea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-19-09 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Then the only other question i have is this.
If it is not the DoJ that has the hearings, if it is congressional, and it ends with a finding *and* legislative safeguards in place, is that partial justice?

I hope the the DoJ can do the right thing, but I know the pressures that are being put to bear on the Obama administration are extreme to save the careers of
our own Nuremberg defense boyz and girlz.

I think our problem is a variant on the famous Robert Anton Wilson saying...

"Support your state police for a better police state!"

We have way over what we need to spend for mil/intel.
We could be equally safe with a quarter of what we spend now plus
a realistic policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-19-09 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. 3rd choice: business as usual, without official comment on the subject you're discussing.
My money is on that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-19-09 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. which means that justice will be distributed unequally based on status
this falls into one of my two choices
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-19-09 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. It's the 'Merkin way, and it always has been. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC