Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Andrew Sullivan irritated at Obama for his answer to pot question...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 10:24 PM
Original message
Andrew Sullivan irritated at Obama for his answer to pot question...
http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2009/03/obamas-pathetic.html

Obama's Pathetic Pot Answer

The chuckle suggests a man of his generation. The dismissiveness toward the question of ending Prohibition as both a good in itself and a form of tax revenue is, however, depressing. His answer was a non-answer. I'm tired of having the Prohibition issue treated as if it's trivial or a joke. It is neither. It is about freedom and it's deadly serious. As for your online audience, Mr president, have you forgotten who got you elected?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mitchtv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. as much as I LOATHE Andrew Sullivan
I agree 100%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well, if it irritated Sullivan...
it can't be all bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. You beat me to it.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. He probably didn't want to create a cultural issue firestorm that would distract from the economy.
Hence the wimpy non-answer. Supporting legalization would give the GOP a huge cultural issue to beat us over our heads with and unfortunately the anti-pot propaganda is so deep that most people would probably agree with them and it would give the Pukes a way to detract from their stupidity and lack of numbers in their response to Obama's budget.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Here's the frame for that concern:
"The states, collectively, would save $DOOM simply by ending the arrests, prosecutions, and incarcerations related to possession of marijuana. This is not to even begin to address the potential tax revenues which would be generated if the several states were to tax, and tax heavily, legal and licensed marijuana sales.

It is for this reason and this reason alone that we should end the prohibition of marijuana. We simply cannot afford, in the most literal sense possible, to continue these policies as we have for the past eighty years."

The trick is to show accurately how much the enforcement actually costs. It's an astonishing amount of money, no matter which state you talk about (with the exceptions of MA and AK).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaker bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. legalization is something to do
between 2014 and 2016. Face it, way too many things need to be done to risk losing the house or the senate in 2010. In the interim, you just place the dollars and priorities elsewhere. Many things are illegal, some are actively enforced, others not so much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #4
21. Last year
Over 800,000 Americans were arrested for possesion. Very active enforcment. The poor and especially minorities are far more likely to be arrested and jailed for pot than other groups.
We spend billions of dollars a year to do this, and waste valuable police resorces as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OwnedByFerrets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
6. He handled that question worse than any that he has taken
In short, he should have said that HEMP is not pot and how it should be legalized for all its uses.
He should have also said that although legalization isnt his first priority, he would work on decriminalization.

Anything but the dismissive way he DID handle it. It was embarrassing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spiritual_gunfighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 06:30 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. That is a great word to describe it
Embarrasing, for the first time in his administration I was equally embarrased that he was my president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
7. I'm irritated too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
9. More BS. Every time Obama does something people don't like. They throw the remember who got
Edited on Fri Mar-27-09 11:42 PM by Thrill
you elected bs. If its not people on this board, its these different interest groups, and bloggers with this crap.

Only politician that gets this thrown in his face constantly. Hmmmm I wonder why? My guess its the arrogance of people, who want to constantly remind him of his race and that they somehow 'allowed' him to be President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spiritual_gunfighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 06:33 AM
Response to Reply #9
15. We did "allow" him to be president
Just like any other elected official. What in the fuck does race have to do with anything here? I could say that with you my guess is that when anyone disagrees with something the President does there are some people that want to deflect criticism by citing his race as a reason not to disagree with something he does. Obama was dead wrong on this and his reframing of the question was frankly embarrasing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #9
26. Perhaps because Republicans actually attempt to
implement at least some of the policies that their base supports when they get into power, while Democrats in power routinely tell is to fuck off?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OwnedByFerrets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #9
29. Thats BS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadLabrador Donating Member (28 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
10. Sullivan is the only conservative blog I visit
And he's right on the money with this analysis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wroberts189 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 02:06 AM
Response to Original message
11. He is not alone ...link to other blog posts about this.....



http://blogs.salon.com/0002762/2009/03/27.html#a3380


one of my favs:

Jim Gilliam, Huffington Post

Pot saved my life. <...>

The President will be asked this question again, and maybe next time he won't laugh at us.



Disclaimer:
I still support Obama and I believe if a bill ending prohibition landed on his desk he would sign it.

btw knr
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 05:39 AM
Response to Original message
12. Obama should have at least ADDRESSED the question
Edited on Sat Mar-28-09 05:40 AM by fujiyama
rather than simply laughing it off, and then dismissing it outright by saying no...

He could have at least taken it as a serious question and said why he opposed it...Especially considering Obama knows better about the disastrous effects of the drug war, especially on urban and minority youth...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 06:23 AM
Response to Original message
13. It was a serious question that was treated as a joke
and that was disappointing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 07:40 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. And he dismissed his fundraising door knocking base.
Oh it was just those internetz. Our jails are stuffed literally to the rafters with victims of the war on drugs big pharma can't patent, and Obama trivialized it for fear of being 'soft on drugs'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
17. He's not the only one irritated,
Obama's continuation of the War on Drugs, despite the clear evidence that we've lost, is the height of stupidity. What's he going to do when the Mexican drug war really crosses the border, and starts turning the streets of the SW into a free fire zone.

Somebody has to have the courage to take on this issue and do the right thing. Sad to say, it looks like Obama is lacking in that courage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. I wonder if the fear of the Mexican Drug War is going to help legalization at all
Edited on Sat Mar-28-09 08:28 AM by proud2BlibKansan
It may end up hurting legalization.

And hey we are still rooting for Mizzou and OK here at my house. Two Big 12 teams in the big dance would be so awesome. :hi:

edit - darn typo LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. I doubt that it will at this point.
Edited on Sat Mar-28-09 08:36 AM by MadHound
It looks more and more like it's simply going to open up the border, then the rest of the country, to increased militarization. Kiss Posse Comitatus goodbye.

Two Big XII teams in the Final Four would be great. If we can get by Connecticut I think that we can out quick Louisville. Playing against KU and Cole Aldrich is good practice for going up against UConn's big guy. I'm thinking that we'll run him into the ground:evilgrin:

Take care of yourself in all that snow:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
18. In order for the drug war to end..
The government will have to admit that it has been lying to the public for the last seventy plus years..

That is going to happen when hippopotami sprout dragonfly wings and take to the air.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
20. Last night, according to Bill Maher, the question about pot was the #1 question
on the Internet. Andrew Sullivan is dead right. Bill Maher felt the same way and also said that Obama treated the question like it was posed to him by potheads who couldn't be taken seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArchieStone1 Donating Member (137 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
23. Obama is wary of making a move that most Americans oppose
58% oppose legalization of marihuana according to a CBS poll taken this month:

http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/03/19/politics/politicalhotsheet/entry4877495.shtml

Polls are very important to politicians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #23
25. He ought to be wary
of making light of issues that are important to the people who actually vote for him as well. Look- I did not expect him to favor legalization, but I also did not expect him to mock the issue as some sort of a joke question, when he knows better, or should.
California is looking at law to legalize in order to help save their economy, so his answer was also out of touch with political reality and the moment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
24. Sully's right on this one
It was a serious question. He smirked it off. Embarassing, and frankly it showed Obama to be out of touch with reality. Imprisoned minority populations, violence, people jailed for needed medicine. The violence in Mexico, the implications of this issue are deep and wide. Obama laughed it off, made light of the whole thing.
They requested questions from the people. And then he mocked the people for doing as he asked. This is a negative and disempowering message. It was also rude at the core.
Obama thinks African American youth being arrested at rates many times higher than their white peers is just a knee slapper, and that I found shocking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greymattermom Donating Member (680 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
27. misdemeanor
The first step is to make possession of small amounts a misdemeanor payable by a fine, like in Canada. That's not legalization, but possession would be view sort of like jaywalking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
28. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC