Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Neither would Afghanistan be allowed to become a tribal state nor a 'puppet,' Karzai said.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 09:04 AM
Original message
Neither would Afghanistan be allowed to become a tribal state nor a 'puppet,' Karzai said.
Mar 18, 2009, 13:40 GMT

Karzai warns allies to stay away from Afghan internal affairs

Kabul - President Hamid Karzai said Wednesday that Afghanistan was no puppet state and warned the international community to stay away from its internal affairs as the country faces a political crisis due to a postponement of presidential polls.

'The Afghan nation is now the owner of its soil and no one can interfere in that,' Karzai told reporters in a joint press conference with visiting NATO Secretary General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer.

Neither would Afghanistan be allowed to become a tribal state nor a 'puppet,' Karzai said.

'Afghanistan is not like the rind of a melon fallen on the ground so anyone can pick it up and do whatever one wants,' he said.

http://www.monstersandcritics.com/news/southasia/news/article_1465412.php/Karzai_warns_allies_to_stay_away_from_Afghan_internal_affairs_
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. spoken like a true puppet. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. got that, didja?
Edited on Wed Mar-18-09 11:37 AM by bigtree
It's clear, though, that he's signaling push-back against the U.S. objections to his regime, at the same time that the U.S. is counting on his (or the next regime's) cooperation in their schemes and missions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
2. It would probably be less of a threat if it was a tribal state.
We just need to make sure the tribes hate eachother so they stay busy killing each other and ignore us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. both crusades pose risks for Afghans
I don't think, though, that tribal governance is preferable by any standard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC