Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ummm...this is one HELL of a typo, don't you think?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
MsKandice01 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 07:41 PM
Original message
Ummm...this is one HELL of a typo, don't you think?
Excuse me if this is a repeat:

Here's the screenshot of an article that's on MSNBC right now. Read the paragraph that starts: "The effect of the timeline". There's something very, very wrong about it. Can you spot it? If you want to read this article in its entirety, it's here: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17811336/



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. Telling
Those insurgents are everywhere you know. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. outsurgents are even worser. I'm series.
Of course, they are confounded and confused by the presence of upsurgents and downsurgents, but everyone agrees that strangesurgents are truly the worst.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackstraw45 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. That wacky Corporate Media....
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. A what?
Edited on Tue Mar-27-07 07:47 PM by Patsy Stone
Joe's a what? What is an independent Democrat? (Small "i", capital "D")
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonRB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Hey, you, get back in the Clubhouse
Countdown isn't over!

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I'm everywhere, baby! :) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonRB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. Anti-war insurgent?
WTF?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. so being anti war now makes you an insurgent?
damn, that's subtle...NOT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #12
50. Ned Lamont was an anti-war insurgent?
Who knew?

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
23. Holy crap!!
:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 08:57 PM
Original message
fucking amazing
just fucking amazing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
6. From the Coulter news agency?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wake.up.america Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
8. snatch defeat from the jaws of progress?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsKandice01 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Keep reading...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wake.up.america Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. anti war insurgent
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sapere aude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
9. Snatch defeat from the jaws of progress?
Edited on Tue Mar-27-07 07:46 PM by Sapere aude
should be, snatch success from the jaws of defeat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsKandice01 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Keep reading...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crikkett Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #9
29. it's actually supposed to be "snatch defeat from the jaws of VICTORY"
which is what Navy Football did time/again when I had the fortune of attending that wonderful institution of higher knowledge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #29
36. Not even these lying fools can say "victory" with a straight face anymore. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #9
39. "snatch victory from the jaws of defeat"
:P

Well, at least they didn't call him a traitor, or a terrorist. Jeebers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sapere aude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
14. anti war insurgent!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
15. So Democrats are insurgents now?
Nice. Lieberman's quote is also unintentionally telling. He can't talk about "snatching defeat from the jaws of victory," because there's no victory to be found in Iraq, so he morphs the quote into "snatching defeat from the jaws of progress" instead. Doesn't have quite the same ring to it. Even Lieberman doesn't truly believe victory is possible in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ljm2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
16. Wow.
Who knew Lieberman was such a war hero, snatching his election victory from that nasty anti-war insurgent!

Wow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
18. So Ned Lamont is an anti-war insurgent?
Who would have guessed? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #18
33. That trickly little Lamont... Imagine. An insurgent in his spare time!
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
19. 'Insurgent'?
WTF?

How do you get that from 'independent'?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsKandice01 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Actually, it was supposed to say candidate
Or something like that. At least independent and insurgent start with the same letters but clearly, whoever wrote this article was either high or trying to be funny. There's just no other explanation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #22
42. They deserve a
"one way ticket to the Moon!"

How could you and your editor fuck up that bad? (Not 'YOU', of course, but the idiot who wrote it.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jayctravis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #22
51. Possibly a very unfortunate spellcheck gaffe?
He needs to stop using the Republicant wordprocessor dictionary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Miss Chybil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
20. Anti-war insurgent? WTF? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CorpGovActivist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
21. An Unlikely Underdog Is Often Referenced as Mounting an "Insurgent" Bid
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&q=%22insurgent+bid%22

In context, I think they meant that Lamont mounted an insurgent bid in the Democratic primary.

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&q=lieberman+challenger+lamont+insurgent

Come on ... let's not all succumb to Rove's Thesaurus.

; )

- Dave
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsKandice01 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. Oooh...excuse my ignorance..
I think that very few people would know what that means. It was poor wording regardless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CorpGovActivist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. It's a Fairly Common Way of Describing an Underdog in a Political Fight
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/insurgent

Howard Dean's upstart bid for the Democratic nod in 04 was described as an insurgent bid for the nomination: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=insurgent+howard+dean

Newt Gingrich has been described as the once-and-future insurgent in the GOP: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&q=gingrich+insurgent

Ned Lamont could - very aptly - be described as having mounted an "insurgent" bid (taking on the establishment candidate in the primaries), and he mounted that surprise bid on an anti-war platform.

Teddy Roosevelt mounted an insurgent bid for the nom, going so far as to form the Bull Moose Party: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bull_moose_party

If we allow Karl Rove and the GOP machine to rob and cheapen our political vocabulary, and make certain words taboo, we'll see a whole new set of words become "dirty," like "liberal".

I think in fairness, the journalist meant to refer to Lamont favorably, by making dual note of his surprising success - and of the fact that his success was due in no small part to his vocal anti-war stance. I don't think the journalist meant to lump him in with IED planters in Iraq.

- Dave
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laurab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #30
37. But Dave....that was before an insurgent was an
INSURGENT. That word practically jumped out at me when I was reading and I immediately had a bad reaction. You may be right, but I think that word needs to be retired by the journalist if you are.

Anyway - it's nice to see you! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. OMG...this is a shocker...
the Corporate Cable Media has informed me of something! I can't believe I've never looked the word up in a dictionary..wild..thanks..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KAZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #21
28. How utterly understanding of you.
I used to be that way. The last 6 years have changed me. Shove it back up their ass, and smile the whole time.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10285339/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #21
46. Context IS everything--and the context is the WAR IN IRAQ.
Just like "the meaning of 'is'" is no longer merely a semantics question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KAZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
24. Here's the link. Let the fuckers know what you think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #24
35. It's an AP story
Here's that link:

http://www.ap.org/pages/contact/contact.html

The writer's name is David Espo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cosmicdot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #35
48. found this version by Espo
Mar 27, 11:11 PM EDT

Senate Signals Support for Iraq Timeline

By DAVID ESPO
AP Special Correspondent

"Lieberman, who won a new term last fall in a three-way race after losing the Democratic nomination to an anti-war insurgent, depicted the vote as a turning point. He said the effect of the timeline would be to 'snatch defeat from the jaws of progress in Iraq'."

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_IRAQ?SITE=MIBAX&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
windbreeze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
25. OH, my lord....shaking my head...wondering what next????
an anti-war insurgent????? EXCUSE ME!!!! Lamont WAS the Democratic NOMINEE...the insurgent was Lieberman, when you get right down to it...
windbreeze
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gold Metal Flake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
31. Dam You, Liberal Media!
They have exposed Project Q!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
32. Snatch?
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
34. Sounds like the hind lick maneuver.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
electron_blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #34
38. LOL! I never heard that expression before
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. The mental image is appropriate here I think.
Edited on Tue Mar-27-07 09:43 PM by lonestarnot
Actually, I just read my email with a funny joke about the hind lick maneuver. I would repeat the joke, but I don't want to hijack the thread here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
41. That's what we need: More anti-war insurgents! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
43. O.M.G. Can it be any more blatant? Totally disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youthere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
44. Isn't he supposed to want defeat "snatched"away?
Or to put it another way, wasn't he supposed to say "snatch VICTORY from the jaws of progress in Iraq?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nam78_two Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
45. WTF
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otherlander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
47. We're voting for them... here...
so we don't have to... vote for them over there? :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cobalt Violet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
49. K & R
That's messed up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DearAbby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 01:14 AM
Response to Original message
52. What?
I took off my glasses and cleaned them, I could not believe what I read...an Anti War INSURGENT???

Next they will write..Anti war terrorists. Hell skip that, Anti AMERICAN. Are they dropping hints like bricks?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC