Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

DOW at sixty nine and a half and floating lower

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 10:05 AM
Original message
DOW at sixty nine and a half and floating lower
Edited on Mon Mar-02-09 10:05 AM by Stinky The Clown
Hasn't been here since the late 90s.

Thanks, George. Thanks alla you repubican fucks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. 4800
that's my thoughts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Do I hear 45?
Who'll gimme 45?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I'm saying 4000 if they do everything right
and 1000 if the corporatists get their way.

In any case, it's going to be a wild ride. The only good thing is that we're all on it together.

Remember, the market was just as hyperinflated as the larger economy was, pumped up by dollars that were really never there, based on the ability of people with declining wages to pay off huge amounts of debt.

It's not easy to lose paper net worth. However, if you're still in the market, you own everything you always did.

If you went to t-bills, however, the outlook is far less certain. In a deflationary cycle they're likely to bring less than their face value, so you might have outsmarted yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
4. Correction is 3,000 IMHO. Watching it fall is slowly killing my father.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Profprileasn Donating Member (127 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
5. Kind of scary...
At bottom though, it'll kind of be like a sale. Just don't know where bottom is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
6. I have a question: in times like these, do most people change how much
they contribute to mutual-fund stock 401k's? My husband maxes his contribution every month, has done so for years--wonder if it'd be better to just keep that money in pay, even if it's taxed? Because right now, it seems to be simply going down the toilet...I know we're buying shares cheap if we stay in and keep contributing, but it's alarming to see the paper losses now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nbsmom Donating Member (419 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. 401 k money is long-term money
If it really freaks you out to open up statements, then you should save into money market or bond funds and skip stock funds for now. But don't trade the 'safety' of a larger paycheck if it means that you're paying a marginally higher tax rate. You can't get that money back later (and with 401k we're usually talking 20 years from now), although the market will eventually recover.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. I know I shouldn't look, but my husband finally took a peek last week
and...GACK! Since we're still fairly young (late thirties), we chose a fairly risky "growth" fund. I lean toward waiting it out now, because if/when the market DOES come back up, I might have a quicker rebound (due to accumulating more shares on the cheap) than someone who has a less-risky portfolio. I need to talk to an expert, I guess, and figure out if more take-home pay (I could always use that) or stodgier investments would do us more good now. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
steelmania75 Donating Member (836 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
7. It was the War in Iraq, and the tax cuts for the wealthy that led up to this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC