Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

ABC: FBI investigating Stanford for drug cartel money laundering .

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 06:42 PM
Original message
ABC: FBI investigating Stanford for drug cartel money laundering .
Well, well, well. Now he really does have reason to hide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. Weren't the first persons who showed up in Antigua
Columbians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. No idea. How very interesting.
Send lawyers, guns, and money. The shit has hit the fan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. This is definitely an
'Oh shit' link. ABC has ditched the Republican contacts.
<snip>
The SEC's fraud charges may be the least of accused financial scammer R. Allen Stanford's worries. Federal authorities tell ABC News that the FBI and others have been investigating whether Stanford was involved in laundering drug money for Mexico's notorious Gulf Cartel.

Authorities tell ABC News that as part of the investigation, which has been ongoing since last year, Mexican authorities detained one of Stanford's private planes. According to officials, checks found inside the plane were believed to be connected to the Gulf cartel, reputed to be Mexico's most violent gang. Authorities say Stanford could potentially face criminal charges of money laundering and bribery of foreign officials.
http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=6907429&page=1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. They should investigate BushCo too for the same crimes.
Stanford looked quite coked up in some of the video footage I've seen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
4. This could get messy
Accused Financier Under Federal Drug Investigation
Authorities:Stanford May Have Laundered Drug Money for Mexican Cartel
February 18, 2009

The SEC's fraud charges may be the least of accused financial scammer R. Allen Stanford's worries. Federal authorities tell ABC News that the FBI and others have been investigating whether Stanford was involved in laundering drug money for Mexico's notorious Gulf Cartel.

Authorities tell ABC News that as part of the investigation, which has been ongoing since last year, Mexican authorities detained one of Stanford's private planes. According to officials, checks found inside the plane were believed to be connected to the Gulf cartel, reputed to be Mexico's most violent gang. Authorities say Stanford could potentially face criminal charges of money laundering and bribery of foreign officials.

(snip)

The federal investigation, however, did not stop Stanford from using corporate money to become a big man at last year's Democratic convention in Denver.

A video posted on the firm's web-site shows Stanford, now sought by U.S. Marshals, being hugged by Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and praised by former President Bill Clinton for helping to finance a convention-related forum and party put on by the National Democratic Institute.

http://www.abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=6907429&page=1


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. They've deliberately left out Delay
Cornyn and Sessions and he threw in 100,000 for Bush's inauguration in 2004 WTF!!!!!
Stanford was playing both sides.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Yep, he was being Fair and Balanced with his $$
What a mess
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Time to post those links to
Delay, Sessions, Cornyn and the Bush 2004 inauguration on the ABC comments pages.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
9. S.E.C. Fines Didn’t Avert Stanford Group Case
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/19/business/19stanford.html?_r=1&hp
<snip>
Years before the Stanford Group was accused in a worldwide fraud, American financial regulators found significant securities violations at the company that some experts say were telltale signs of deeper problems. But each time the regulators ultimately let the company off with relatively small fines, records show.

Experts said that the earlier violations amounted to a series of red flags of deeper problems. Officials at the S.E.C. said Wednesday that they were reviewing the regulatory history of Stanford, and whether the agency — often accused of lax enforcement — should have been more vigilant in this case.

In 2007, the S.E.C. found that the Stanford Group did not have adequate capital to meet the requirements of being a broker-dealer. The company paid $20,000 to settle those charges. Later that same year the firm was censured and paid an additional $10,000 to resolve accusations that it had provided “misleading, unfair and unbalanced information” about its certificates of deposit, according to records kept by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, the agency known as Finra that polices Wall Street for the S.E.C.

Late last year, Stanford paid $30,000 to resolve a third set of accusations by Finra that the company had failed in its research reports to adequately disclose a variety of research methods and the way it was valuing certain securities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC