Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama preserves rendition two days after taking office

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-01-09 12:53 PM
Original message
Obama preserves rendition two days after taking office
http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Obama_preserves_rendition_in__0201.html

Two days after taking the helm of a country ready for change after eight years of George W. Bush, President Obama has allowed one controversial "War on Terror" tactic to remain in place: rendition.

Despite frequent condemnation of the practice around the world, rendition -- the secret capture, transportation and detention of suspected terrorists to foreign prisons in countries that cooperate with the U.S. -- remains in the CIA's playbook, thanks to a recent executive order issued by President Obama.

Other executive orders shuttered the CIA's secret prisons and banned the harsh interrogation techniques that have been termed torture. And in his most widely noticed break with his predecessor, Obama signed an order to close Guantanamo Bay's prison within one year.

But rendition will remain. Obama and his administration appear to believe that the rendition program was one piece of the Bush administration's war on terrorism that it could not afford to discard, the Los Angeles Times reported.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-01-09 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good
Bernard Madoff should be the first to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-01-09 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. (facepalm)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-01-09 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. some torture is good torture
or perhaps 'gitmo' is just the wrong place for torture, but torture is fine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-01-09 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I hope you just forgot to put your sarcasm icon thingy. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-01-09 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. I'm interpreting the Obama doctrine on torture.
My opinion is that it is a war crime as per the geneva conventions, but I'm a nobody on the internet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-01-09 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. If you are talking about white collar corporate supercriminals, then I say yes
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-01-09 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
6. That's really disappointing on the face of it
And I wonder what his reason is. Is rendition strictly about torture or is it about taking captives to the countries where they committed the crimes whether those countries torture or not? It's not simple I know, but I can't condone torture anywhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zen Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-01-09 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
7. Feinstein said today that it's not rendition because they won't be sent to foreign countries.
She said according to the new order that the CIA can continue to abduct and question people, but not send to foreign detention centers or black sites. Diane should know, because I think she probably prefers the old rendition policies anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-01-09 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
9. So after "Two Days after take the helm of a country".....as the article reads, President Obama
Edited on Sun Feb-01-09 01:26 PM by FrenchieCat
has not YET reversed Bush's Rendition executive order.

Is there something that I'm missing?
Or is this a story of how Obama hasn't YET REVERSED Bush's rendition order?

Are we all really that impatient to this extent? :shrug:





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC