Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sen. Patrick Leahy stepped across the 'Lines in the Sand'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 12:42 PM
Original message
Sen. Patrick Leahy stepped across the 'Lines in the Sand'

http://counterpunch.com/fleischman03242007.html


Confrontation, At Last
Lines in the Sand


Rejoice! Congress may have come to life!

The President has drawn his line in the sand and a Senator has crossed it!

"We will not go along with a partisan fishing expedition aimed at honorable public servants," President Bush said in a last ditch effort to keep his manipulator, Karl Rove, and his former attorney, Harriet Miers, from being questioned under oath in a Congressional hearing. They would be grilled on the scandal that's been hanging over the Justice Department, and particularly Alberto Gonzales, the Attorney General, about the dismissal of eight US Federal Attorneys allegedly for political purposes.

Senator Patrick Leahy, D-VT., chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, is the man who stepped across that line in the sand and threatened to send out subpoenas for Rove, Miers and their aides if they didn,t appear voluntarily. "I want testimony under oath. I,m sick and tired of getting half-truths on this," said Leahy. "Testimony should be on the record and under oath. That's the formula for true accountability-- it is not helpful to be telling the Senate how to do our investigation or to prejudge its outcome."

Rep. John Conyers, Jr., Democrat of Michigan, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee doesn,t want anyone like the President telling him how to do his investigation, either. He is also preparing subpoenas for Rove and Miers to get their sworn testimony in the House inquiry.
-snip-
---------------------------


get those subpoenas SERVED NOW
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tiptoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. * use of the terms "honorable.public.servants" is what drove Leahy over the line nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. The Whole BushCo Cronyism approach is anything BUT Honorable..they lack INTEGRITY and Patriotism
Go Pat....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JitterbugPerfume Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. wasn't it Leahy
who Cheney told to fo f##k himself a couple of years ago?

Oh my!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tiptoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. yep. Somewhat curiously, same words were used by election-pollster Warren Mitofsky to Ron Baiman:
Edited on Sat Mar-24-07 01:09 PM by tiptoe
Direct Material Proof of Massive Election Fraud in Ohio in the 2004 U.S. Presidential Election —Ron Baiman (commented upon at very end of video; plus copy of final correspondence from Mitofsky in PDF)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oilwellian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. Someone pinch me
I feel as though I'm dreaming. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
6. Pat Leahy's genuinely classy "In Your FACE Mr. President"
I love it.

It takes an elder statesman from Vermont to step up to the plate and politely and genuinely tell both the Chimp and Darth to *go f*ck yourself* without the filth.

Go LEAHY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
7. This is far from over. And I think more lines will be drawn.
Threats of subpoenas is not issuing subpoenas. No one has testified under oath in the matter.

Until something comes of this mess, Leahy and Conyers are doing their jobs.

Which is way more than their counterparts were doing for the last 6 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
8. No. Don't serve the subpoenas now.
I too advocated this position until I was corrected. The subpoenas are strengthened by an attempt to negotiate with the exec branch. And Pat Leahy is an experienced former prosecutor as well as having been a Senator for 32 years. He's building a case. I think we'd do well to have some faith in his abilities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC