|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Christa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 09:25 AM Original message |
One year old baby girl is pregnant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 09:29 AM Response to Original message |
1. That's freaky. Hope they can remove the fetus without permanently |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kalyke (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 09:32 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. I hope they're ALLOWED to abort the fetus. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 09:35 AM Response to Reply #3 |
4. I don't think there's any possible way for this baby to have a baby--simply |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kalyke (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 10:05 AM Response to Reply #4 |
13. I know this - I was being rhetorical. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ComtesseDeSpair (529 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 10:02 AM Response to Reply #1 |
8. Yeah, cuz lord knows... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 10:13 AM Response to Reply #8 |
15. ??--she might want to have children someday. I wasn't commenting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
misanthrope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 11:40 PM Response to Reply #15 |
18. Then she can adopt**nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LisaL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 11:41 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. Oh give me a break. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leeroysphitz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 09:31 AM Response to Original message |
2. poor little thing... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crikkett (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 09:41 AM Response to Original message |
5. it's a virgin birth! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crunchy Frog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 09:49 AM Response to Original message |
6. Overly sensationalized. It's called "fetus in fetu" and not really all that rare. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LisaL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 09:54 AM Response to Reply #6 |
7. Not really that rare? I have never heard of another fetus being in the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NashVegas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 10:11 AM Response to Reply #6 |
14. I Was Thinking the Same: "Wow, What a Completely False Headline" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lurky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 11:03 PM Response to Reply #6 |
16. That wikipedia article is scary! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 10:03 AM Response to Original message |
9. They should name her Tribble |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ogneopasno (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 10:04 AM Response to Reply #9 |
12. Quite a timesaver. "I KNOW, but REALLY!" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ogneopasno (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 10:03 AM Response to Original message |
10. Um. That's not "pregnant" and an absorbed twin is not that uncommon. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kerrytravelers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 10:04 AM Response to Original message |
11. A friend of ours was pregnant with twins. One twin died and sort of "joined" the remaining fetus. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 11:46 PM Response to Reply #11 |
22. Not quite. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JI7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 11:06 PM Response to Original message |
17. can this really be described as "pregnant" ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 11:43 PM Response to Reply #17 |
20. no, that not "pregnant" -- it's a bullshit sensational headline |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 11:43 PM Response to Reply #17 |
21. No. Unless you want to refer to affected males as "pregnant" too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
texastoast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 11:51 PM Response to Original message |
23. Isn't that more like |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Apr 24th 2024, 12:47 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC