Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senate clears path for $350 billion bailout bill

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-09 06:58 PM
Original message
Senate clears path for $350 billion bailout bill
http://www.marketwatch.com/News/Story/Story.aspx?guid={B1292C16-87BC-4281-BA9E-48E64401B46D}&siteid=nbkh

"Senate lawmakers on Thursday voted against a measure that would have barred the release of the second half of a $700 billion bank-bailout bill. Senators voted 52-42 to oppose a measure known as a resolution of disapproval introduced by Sen. David Vitter, R-La. President Elect Barack Obama made a request for the funds on Monday...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-09 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. i disapprove of davey vitter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-09 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I agree with Feingold, Dorgan etc.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-09 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. Roll call link...
http://senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=111&session=1&vote=00005

Grouped By Vote Position YEAs ---42

Barrasso (R-WY)
Bayh (D-IN)
Bennett (R-UT)
Bond (R-MO)
Brownback (R-KS)
Burr (R-NC)
Cantwell (D-WA)
Chambliss (R-GA)
Coburn (R-OK)
Cochran (R-MS)
Collins (R-ME)
Corker (R-TN)
Cornyn (R-TX)
Crapo (R-ID)
DeMint (R-SC)
Dorgan (D-ND)
Ensign (R-NV)
Enzi (R-WY)
Feingold (D-WI)
Graham (R-SC)
Grassley (R-IA)
Hutchison (R-TX)
Inhofe (R-OK)
Isakson (R-GA)
Johanns (R-NE)
Lincoln (D-AR)
Martinez (R-FL)
McCain (R-AZ)
McConnell (R-KY)
Murkowski (R-AK)
Nelson (D-FL)
Risch (R-ID)
Roberts (R-KS)
Sanders (I-VT)
Sessions (R-AL)
Shaheen (D-NH)
Shelby (R-AL)
Specter (R-PA)
Thune (R-SD)
Vitter (R-LA)
Wicker (R-MS)
Wyden (D-OR)

NAYs ---52

Akaka (D-HI)
Alexander (R-TN)
Baucus (D-MT)
Begich (D-AK)
Biden (D-DE)
Bingaman (D-NM)
Boxer (D-CA)
Burris (D-IL)
Byrd (D-WV)
Cardin (D-MD)
Carper (D-DE)
Casey (D-PA)
Clinton (D-NY)
Conrad (D-ND)
Dodd (D-CT)
Durbin (D-IL)
Feinstein (D-CA)
Gregg (R-NH)
Hagan (D-NC)
Harkin (D-IA)
Inouye (D-HI)
Johnson (D-SD)
Kerry (D-MA)
Klobuchar (D-MN)
Kohl (D-WI)
Kyl (R-AZ)
Landrieu (D-LA)
Lautenberg (D-NJ)
Leahy (D-VT)
Levin (D-MI)
Lieberman (ID-CT)
Lugar (R-IN)
McCaskill (D-MO)
Menendez (D-NJ)
Merkley (D-OR)
Mikulski (D-MD)
Murray (D-WA)
Nelson (D-NE)
Pryor (D-AR)
Reed (D-RI)
Reid (D-NV)
Rockefeller (D-WV)
Salazar (D-CO)
Schumer (D-NY)
Snowe (R-ME)
Stabenow (D-MI)
Udall (D-CO)
Udall (D-NM)
Voinovich (R-OH)
Warner (D-VA)
Webb (D-VA)
Whitehouse (D-RI)

Present - 2
Hatch (R-UT)
Tester (D-MT)

Not Voting - 3
Brown (D-OH)
Bunning (R-KY)
Kennedy (D-MA)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-09 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. Looking more and more like the next step with the rescue funds will be an RTC like entity
which has probably been in everyone's interest for over a year now....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-09 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. 8 Democrats voted aganst Barack? wow just wow
Edited on Thu Jan-15-09 07:11 PM by BrentTaylor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-09 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Maybe they voted for the taxpayers n/t
Edited on Thu Jan-15-09 07:31 PM by slipslidingaway
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-09 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Analysts - The second 350 billion may not be enough...
http://www.cnbc.com/id/28674262

"More TARP money will have to be thrown at banks to avoid a systematic financial breakdown, economic experts said on "Squawk Box" Thursday.

Bank of America, whose once estimated $50 billion acquisition of Merrill Lynch has now dropped to a $19 billion deal, is among the banks that will need more money. Yet, even with the injection of more capital to acquire Merrill Lynch, Bank of America may still be in perilous territory because of the pending litigation it faces regarding the bond holders’ settlements...

“The fact that Bank of America is going back now to the treasury and saying 'we need more money,' the fact that Citigroup is in trouble, the fact that many regional banks are insolvent, the fact that hundreds of community banks are insolvent means we need much more,” said Nouriel Roubini, chairman of RGEMonitor.com. “If the credit losses are going to be as large as the estimate, $350 billion is not going to be enough.”

In fact, it may take multiple TARP funds to increase lending and to save the banks, Edmund Phelps, Nobel Prize winner and economic professor at Columbia University, said..."









Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-09 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
6. Get use to this from Lincoln. You can't can't count on her for the Free Choice Act either
Shes up for re-election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-09 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
8. Bank of America Threatens Fed, Demands More Cash From Taxpayers
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2009/01/bank-of-america-threatens-fed-demands.html

"I suggest Bank of America has easily bitten off more than it can chew and said so at the time, on September 15, 2008 in Market Votes "No Confidence" In Merrill, Bank of America Merger...


Assuming for a second that Lewis had his mental capabilities with him at the time, there is yet another explanation for that ridiculous offer. Please consider Another Shotgun Marriage: Bank of America and Merrill Lynch...


A shotgun wedding at a purposely ridiculous price with an agreement from the Fed to pick up the pieces later if necessary sounds just like what the doctor ordered. Of course it could be pure incompetence by Lewis, or a pure gamble by Lewis that the Fed (taxpayers) would pick up the pieces if it all came crashing down..."



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Augdog20 Donating Member (119 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-09 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
9. vote in online poll: who should be Commerce Secretary?
Check out my blog
and vote in online blog (Blue Republic of America):

Who should be Obama's Commerce Sec?

http://bluesunited.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lib2DaBone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-09 12:51 AM
Response to Original message
10. No No No MOre...Stop The Insanity..No more $$ to the Bankster/Gangsters
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-09 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Missed your reply and yes I agree! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC