Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BUSH, CHENEY & GONZALES Blocked Gitmo Closing (NYT)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:50 PM
Original message
BUSH, CHENEY & GONZALES Blocked Gitmo Closing (NYT)
New to Pentagon, Gates Argued for Closing Guantánamo Prison


By THOM SHANKER and DAVID E. SANGER
Published: March 23, 2007

In his first weeks as defense secretary, Robert M. Gates repeatedly argued that the detention facility at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, had become so tainted abroad that legal proceedings at Guantánamo would be viewed as illegitimate, according to senior administration officials. He told President Bush and others that it should be shut down as quickly as possible.

Mr. Gates’s arguments were rejected after Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales and some other government lawyers expressed strong objections to moving detainees to the United States, a stance that was backed by the office of Vice President Dick Cheney, administration officials said.

As Mr. Gates was making his case, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice joined him in urging that the detention facility be shut down, administration officials said. But the high-level discussions about closing Guantánamo came to a halt after Mr. Bush rejected the approach.

more at:
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/23/washington/23gitmo.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Purveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. Last I heard, Congress was to cut off funding for the continued operation of Gitmo...
Anyone have an update on this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. Gates isn't a loyal bushie....hmmmmmm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. GITMOGATE?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. I bet that's why Newsweek said "torture" is the next problem for WH!
Has everyone had enough yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
5. How can the president get honest advice
if his underlings can't propose the crimes that are a natural extension of their policies?

KR. :hi: kp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 12:16 AM
Response to Original message
6. There's a way to undo the Gitmo damage.
Hold public hearings and let them testify to what happened. Then let them sue our asses off.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patriought Donating Member (112 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 03:59 AM
Response to Original message
7. Veddy Interesting...
"Mr. Bush", not Mr. President.

Could the cold grip of sanity be creeping into the subconcious here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 05:00 AM
Response to Original message
8. "*I'm* The Decider"
:eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 05:19 AM
Response to Original message
9. To the fugging Hague
Arrest them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Felinity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 06:19 AM
Response to Original message
10. Their rules.
If it is right, don't do it. Unless there's money in it, a lot of money to balance off doing anything positive.

How much air is left in the Neocon hot air balloon?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Lost Patriot Donating Member (75 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 08:04 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. A Hopeful Outcome.
Edited on Fri Mar-23-07 08:10 AM by The Lost Patriot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. Hi The Lost Patriot!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IWantAChange Donating Member (974 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
12. Is Dubyha's psyche that delicate he can't ever admit a mistake?
perchance there should be a battery of psychological tests administered to all presidential candidates to determine if they are well-balanced adults capable of the job??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
13. chimpy's war crimes are going to come back to haunt him eventually
from the article -

"Some administration lawyers are deeply reluctant to move terrorism suspects to American soil because it could increase their constitutional and statutory rights — and invite an explosion of civil litigation. Guantánamo was chosen because it was an American military facility but not on American soil."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxsolomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
14. nice try, gates
even condi can see how it hurts our diplomacy.

next time you try, use fear as a motivator - its the only thing * understands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogcycle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
15. is gitmo a DoD op or a DoJ?
here we have two cabinet-level officials arguing to close it, and the DoJ guy with the inside track to the boss (and no doubt a long list of transgressions he could expose) has veto power?


The executive branch is supposed to carry out the laws as defined by congress. The one place the executive is given some vague sort of autonomy is the statement that the executive is CinC of military.

So shrub is using that to do whatever the fuck he wants in all branches - I'm sure if he wanted to clearcut the redwoods he'd say it was a military necessity.

Sounds more and more like gonzo/rove is "bush's brain". Or maybe gonzo is just a convenient shill for rove. Regardless, we have unquestionably the most warped, distorted, evil imitation of what the Constitution calls for imagineable.


We HAVE to keep the heat on congress to KEEP PROBING. And BE READY.

The more cornered they feel the more likely they are to go postal. And Congress had damned well better have a Plan B in mind for that eventuality. When it comes, there won't be time to waste on impeachment.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MetaTrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
16. They're afraid that in taking the facility down, somebody will dig up the ground behind it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
17. If we get a new AG, he or she will not want to be associated with the Gulag.
So it is no wonder the administration is prepared to fight for Al till the bitter end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC