Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

When you see "movements" growing, the first questions to ask: Who's funding it, & why? Christian

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 09:29 PM
Original message
When you see "movements" growing, the first questions to ask: Who's funding it, & why? Christian
fundamentalism, mega-churches, Dominionism, etc. - there's been a ton of $$$ dumped into these "movements" since Reagan, & not all, or even most, by true believers. Into the mega-churches, into the training institutes, into the media, into the system of rewards used to attract new adherents & followers.

Fundamentalism is a valued element in the toolbox of the ruling class.

1. Bleeds off dissent/dissatisfaction into manageable channels.

2. Creates a "space" for political manipulation & organization, i.e. "connected" preachers telling their flocks what to believe, who to vote for, submit candidates for local office, etc.

3. Creates a base from which scapegoating of other groups for current problems can occur - again, diffusing dissatisfaction & unhappiness into reactionary, unproductive channels - which nevertheless remove the heat from the ruling class.

It's my opinion that the rise of the fundies isn't a grassroots phenomenon.

Warren is a part of that, & this invocation is a part of that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. What is interesting, and there was a BBC article on it rattling around on
the web, is that the number of Fundies is pretty static. They keep bouncing around from church to church. That is the reason for the shadow wars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I'd take issue with that. If you asked the folks in my church what they were, they'd mostly say
Edited on Fri Dec-19-08 09:43 PM by Hannah Bell
"Quaker".

But the theology they've been getting for the last ten years from their leadership is fundie. They now have a holy-roller style service & send folks to events like Promise Keepers.

There are lots of ways to take over churches. Just like the right started by taking over school boards, the fundies have taken over the leadership of some of the main-line dominations, & fundie-trained or influenced pastors have taken over individual churches as well.

Not to mention the influence of what's touted as "Christian" in the media, i.e. Warren's best-selling, highly influential, "Purpose-driven life".

It ain't an accident.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 01:33 AM
Response to Reply #2
11. That is the shadow wars. When you've hit a wall on recruitment, you
start hostile take-overs of other religions. There are billions in assets that can be gained, and money is power.

When a big scary moved here, they sent out disrupters to infiltrate congregations of smaller churches. They managed to take over a few before everyone caught on to their game. Most of the members eventually moved to other churches, but the big scary did manage to gain control of the land and assets of several churches.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 04:35 AM
Response to Reply #11
19. assets, that's another point, thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
conscious evolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #2
22. There are lots of ways to take over churches
One way is to do what they did to the Southern Babtist Convention.
By taking control of the SBC they gained control of the Babtist seminaries and that gave them control of the theology BEING TAUGHT to future preachers.These thoroughly indoctrinated preachers then went out and indoctrinated there flocks.
They have spent the last 25 years brainwashing people into their batshit crazy bullshit idealogy.
IMO,they have poisoned the minds of millions of followers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. Another excellent post on Dominionists and their strategies. Thanks for broadening the scope
of this recent incursion. This really is far more serious than people think, and I am alarmed (I don't think I've ever posted so much on one topic). K & R.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. As Deep Throat said all those years ago-"FOLLOW THE MONEY"
Edited on Fri Dec-19-08 10:38 PM by BrklynLiberal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
musette_sf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. great post
fundies are masters of the Plen-T-Plaint, a term coined by Thomas Frank in "What's The Matter With Kansas?".

Everything seems to piss conservatives off. And they react by documenting and cataloging their disgust. The result is what we will call the plen-T-plaint, a curious amassing of petty, unrelated beefs with the world. Its purpose is not really to evaluate the hated liberal culture that surrounds us; the plen-T-plaint is a horizontal rather than vertical mode of criticism, aiming instead to infuriate us with dozens, hundreds, thousands of stories of the many tiny ways the world around us assaults family values, uses obscenities, disrespects parents<...> It offers no resolution, simply reminding us that we can never win. The plen-T-plaint is the rhetorical device that makes Bill O'Reilly's TV show a hit, as he gets indignant one day about the Insane Clown Posse and gets indignant the next about the Man-Boy Love Association .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
6. yet fundamentalism in other countries is equated with terrorism there
But not here -- ??

If ever there was a movement that seeks to do real damage to the Constitution and to minority groups in this country, it's fundamentalism. The true American Taliban.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. They have not done anything yet because they are trying to infiltrate the govt , not
overthrow it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
8. I can't argue with you and if its true it is very frightening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StClone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
9. Pat Robertson Billionaire It is ALL about the control and $$$
Most top Religio-Wacko Leaders of a Mega-Church are doing the Lord's work whilst believing they are getting around the "through the Camel's eye" thingy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Robertson = scum. Christian my ass.
Card-carrying shill for the new world order, exploiter & murderer of the poor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 01:37 AM
Response to Original message
12. Then where is the money coming from exactly?
Has anyone documented what you're talking about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 01:45 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. start with the devos/prince empire, & work from there.
Edited on Sat Dec-20-08 01:53 AM by Hannah Bell
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 06:39 AM
Response to Reply #12
20. Paul Weyrich just kicked the can.
Wonder where he left all that dough...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 01:45 AM
Response to Original message
14. Nailed it again Hannah! You nailed it again!
It's the exact same network that made Palin ready for office and keeping her in the public eye, yet safe from scrutiny.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 01:55 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. yep. also the ones positioning huckabee as the "kinder, gentler" fundie,
with the daily show appearances, etc.

i think he's the next nominee. a hard-core fundie, v. bush's fakery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 03:02 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. Same crap, different packaging.
I'm hoping people can see through the propaganda and marketing tricks.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 02:10 AM
Response to Original message
16. Excellent OP & Thread!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConsAreLiars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 03:22 AM
Response to Original message
18. Here's a great resource for finding funding the fundies information, as well as
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 06:58 AM
Response to Original message
21. you should use the past tense
the rise of the evangelicals wasn't a grassroots phenomenon.

Now the story about the evangelicals is their decline, at least their political involvement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. ummm...warren's high-profile opposition to prop 8 & his subsequent tap to
give the inaugural invocation kinda casts doubt on your hypothesis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC