Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login


Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
nosmokes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-08 05:22 PM
Original message
I'm not sure what's going on here and I haven't had a chance to read all the attchments, but I don't understand why the tribes would be unable to maintain the bison refuge


For Immediate Release: December 8, 2008
Contact: Jeff Ruch (202) 265-7337


Bison Range Deal Cedes Inherently Federal Functions and Bars Public Oversight

Washington, DC A Bush administration deal giving operational control over the National Bison Range to a Montana tribe for the next three years is illegal, according to a federal lawsuit filed today by Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER). This precedent-setting arrangement has national repercussions, as another 18 refuges in 8 states, constituting 80% of the entire National Wildlife Refuge System, are eligible for similar tribal agreements. So are 57 National Parks in 19 states, including parks such as Redwood, Glacier, Voyageurs, Olympic and the Cape Cod National Seashore.

Plaintiffs bringing the suit feature four former Bison Range refuge managers whose tenures span 40 years, a former Chief of the National Wildlife Refuge System and Nathaniel Reed, former Assistant Interior Secretary during the Nixon and Ford administrations, as well as a current Bison Range employee whose job is being displaced. The suit cites violations of federal laws which

* Forbid outsourcing inherently federal functions as well as require that operational control of all refuges remain with the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service;
* Ensure public access to financial and other records maintained by federal contractors and mandate a full and open review of environmental impacts of major federal actions; and
* Shield federal employees from job loss at the direction of groups outside the federal government and guarantee return rights once the agreement ends.

The National Bison Range agreement improperly contracts out operation of a major federal facility without adequate oversight to protect taxpayers, stated PEER senior counsel Paula Dinerstein, who filed the action today in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. Ceding substantial control over a national refuge requires an act of Congress and cannot legally be given away in a closed-door deal.

Negotiated with top U.S. Interior Department officials, the Bison Range agreement transfers all jobs, except for a Refuge Manager and deputy, to the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes (CSKT). This agreement, which takes full effect in January, is a successor to a more limited FY 2005 agreement which the Fish & Wildlife Service summarily rescinded in December 2006 citing a host of performance-related issues on the part of the Tribe, as well as reported mistreatment of FWS employees by the CSKT.

This arrangement seems designed to settle a political debt rather than enhance the refuge mission, Dinerstein added. In fact, the agreement itself concedes that wildlife-related services will likely suffer.

Called the crown jewel of the National Wildlife Refuge System, the National Bison Range is one of the nations oldest refuges and celebrated its centennial this past May.

complete release including links to related sources here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC