Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Single payer health care is a public-private partnership

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 09:38 AM
Original message
Single payer health care is a public-private partnership
Publicly funded; privately delivered. We have a different private sector than all the incremental plans proposed, though. Our private businesses provide health care; in the other proposed private-public partnerships, the private part includes businesses which exist to prevent as much access to actual care as possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
1. And the private sector argument is falling into ill repute.
Contrary to Republican ideology, everything actually doesn't work better in the private sector.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. All I meant is that single payer does not mean that providers will be government employees
--any more than the contractors who built the Interstate Highway System were government employees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scisyhp1 Donating Member (84 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. So what if they are government employees?
Maybe even they should be government employees. The soldiers, sailors and marines
certainly are. Maybe they will argee to work for less and save us all a lot of money
in exchange for employment security and a good pension plan? What would be so wrong
with that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Too much hassle
Leave the delivery of care as it is for now. If we want more government clinics and hospitals like VA, we can deal with that later. The important thing is to divert the health care money we are now spending to actual care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. I got your point and it's a good one.
Just wanted to add a caveat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
2. Could you explain this for me a little bit more, please?
Edited on Wed Dec-03-08 09:46 AM by patrice
I'm kind of new to the issue and trying to get up to speed (with a local group, based in one of our regional (teaching) medical centers, who is working on this AND have taken a strong stand for Single Payer).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Best information is at Physicians for National Health Care
http://www.pnhp.org/

The idea is to put everybody in one big risk pool. Funding will be from the same sources it is from now, but none will go through private insurance. Delivery would be our current delivery system, with free choice of providers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knixphan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. thanks for that link-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
9. One thing that is not mentioned when talking about this plan is that after
30 years of our formerly mixed delivery system being given to and destroyed by the health care denial industry is that, no matter what plan is adopted, we will have to invest a considerable sum in rebuilding capacity. What's left of our system simply does not have the capacity to absorb another 50 - 70 million users.

Qualifier; I am one of the earliest promoters of HR. 676 here. This is not to equivocate on single payer universal health care, but to point out that the system is even more broken than most imagine.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. In many respects we have overcapacity. The undercapacity is in the area
--of general practice physicians and nurses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC