Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"I bet there's not a single year where I couldn't have gone somewhere else

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ben_meyers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-29-08 03:40 PM
Original message
"I bet there's not a single year where I couldn't have gone somewhere else
Edited on Sat Nov-29-08 04:03 PM by ben_meyers
and made more," said Rubin, according to the Journal.

Now that is an arrogant asshole!


NEW YORK (Reuters) – Former U.S. Treasury secretary Robert Rubin said the near-collapse of Citigroup Inc (C.N), where he is a senior counselor, was due to the buckling financial system and not his own mistakes, according to an interview published on The Wall Street Journal's website on Friday.

Rubin, who is also a director at Citigroup, acknowledged he was involved in a board decision to ramp up risk-taking in 2004 and 2005, according to the paper, and said if executives had executed the plan properly, the bank's losses would have been less.

The Journal said Rubin has earned $115 million in pay since 1999, excluding stock options.

"I bet there's not a single year where I couldn't have gone somewhere else and made more," said Rubin, according to the Journal.



http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20081129/bs_nm/us_citi;_ylt=ApZ8tUryU.zJRTPIBmXZFqO573QA

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Idealism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-29-08 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. "If executives had executed the plan properly, the bank's losses would have been less."
So the best execution of the purported plan was STILL a net loss?? What the fuck kind of plan is that and how is it NOT his fault if he was part of the decision??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-29-08 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Yep, I've been saying this
for a long time now. The top financiers created this mortgage "investment vehicle" and pushed it onto unsuspecting homeowners. They created the entire fiasco - and now they want to pretend they're the victims. And too many people who have been brainwashed to blame the poor and revere the rich will go right along with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-29-08 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'm guessing that his stockholders wish he would have exercised those options.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 04:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC