Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. Pledges Top $7.7 Trillion to Ease Frozen Credit (Update 2)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Andre II Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-25-08 03:30 AM
Original message
U.S. Pledges Top $7.7 Trillion to Ease Frozen Credit (Update 2)
The U.S. government is prepared to provide more than $7.76 trillion on behalf of American taxpayers after guaranteeing $306 billion of Citigroup Inc. debt yesterday. The pledges, amounting to half the value of everything produced in the nation last year, are intended to rescue the financial system after the credit markets seized up 15 months ago.

The unprecedented pledge of funds includes $3.18 trillion already tapped by financial institutions in the biggest response to an economic emergency since the New Deal of the 1930s, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. The commitment dwarfs the plan approved by lawmakers, the Treasury Department’s $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program. Federal Reserve lending last week was 1,900 times the weekly average for the three years before the crisis.

When Congress approved the TARP on Oct. 3, Fed Chairman Ben S. Bernanke and Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson acknowledged the need for transparency and oversight. Now, as regulators commit far more money while refusing to disclose loan recipients or reveal the collateral they are taking in return, some Congress members are calling for the Fed to be reined in.

“Whether it’s lending or spending, it’s tax dollars that are going out the window and we end up holding collateral we don’t know anything about,” said Congressman Scott Garrett, a New Jersey Republican who serves on the House Financial Services Committee. “The time has come that we consider what sort of limitations we should be placing on the Fed so that authority returns to elected officials as opposed to appointed ones.”
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=an3k2rZMNgDw&refer=news
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-25-08 03:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. See how easy it is to spend OPM (Other People's Money)???
Especially when they're merely infants right now ... or not even born yet. :puke:

Our children and grandchildren should piss on our graves and spit after mentioning our names. :grr:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-25-08 05:10 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. They will
don't worry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-25-08 07:21 AM
Response to Original message
3. Psst, that's a high percentage of the GDP 59%
HOLY SHITE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-25-08 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
4. Except that they aren't. Most journalists seem not to understand a credit facility
even financial journalists.

The Fed has pledged more than Treasury, but the Fed has provided a credit facility, not an appropriation.

It is simply exchanging money for commercial paper. The commercial paper comes due in as little as 30 days and the Fed gets paid back, and recycles that money to more commercial paper. IIRC, the commercial paper facility accounts for $2 trillion.

Other Fed facilities are credit facilities with other central banks in Europe and Asia.

It would be good to know exactly how much exposure the Fed and Treasury have, but this kind of reporting isn't getting us there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC