Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Universal Healthcare could be a fantastic jobs and growth engine

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 02:06 PM
Original message
Universal Healthcare could be a fantastic jobs and growth engine
Think about it. We would need more clinics, more hospitals, more medical and support personnel , more new construction of facilities and remodelling work of old, more training schools, more HR people, more drivers of medical supplies, and on and on and on.

I don't know if the old manufacturing jobs will ever come back, but caring for each other could be a perfectly fine way to put the nation back to work.

These jobs all need to pay a decent, living wage, naturally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. Especially if none of the jobs are outsourced.
We will always need manufacturing jobs and those workers will need healthcare.

I like your idea.

Kicked and recommended.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. We can retrain all the former medical insurance claim deniers
to work as janitors in the hospitals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Idealism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. I think you are overestimating the opportunity here
The reason why medical care costs so much in this country is because we have a beauracy inside health care companies that do paperwork and medical billing and lawyers that seek to deny you benefit claims. By hiring more people to do this, its not going to lower the cost to us, nor help the system become more efficient.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Everything you mention is what most people believe a Universal access
is designed to get rid of or at the very least streamline and make more, not less, efficient.

If more people have more access to healthcare than more providers and facilities will be needed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Idealism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Where will the money come to build these things
if Obama doesn't create another WPA-like entity? What about the money spent retraining people that used to work in the private insurance claims field? Universal health care will put companies out of work, like the idea or not, that means layoffs of thousands and thousands of employees. I would love healthcare, and do believe its a right-especially if the government doesnt regulate the insurance companies- because the cost to consumers is rediculous, in part due to the government not stepping in and drawing a line, but I am not sure how realistic the idea is unless we completely revamp the system
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
4. Very true. Building necessary infrastructure is how FDR pulled us through the Great Depression.
We need to retool the automakers to build green cars, rebuild our railways to make passenger travel and commuter travel viable again, implement UHC and build more hospitals, train more doctors, nurses, technicians, etc., rebuild our schools, start building green power generation infrastructure such as windmills, solar panels, geothermal equipment, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. That's a very plausible picture of a future world that I think is attainable.
It will take bold thinking and large plans to do successfully.

I hope we get ris of the self-defeating "incrementalists" who always want to do everything in itty bitty baby steps because change is so scary to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StreetKnowledge Donating Member (921 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Responses
"We need to retool the automakers to build green cars"

That's coming. It's going to take time to make green cars be viable (and development into technologies takes time), but that day will come.

"rebuild our railways to make passenger travel and commuter travel viable again"

Already is in some places. California's HSR project is the wave of the future. I expect the next couple decades to see high-speed-rail projects to come across the US, up both coasts and across much of the Midwest, and the gap between to be filled by Amtrak's trains, which have far more comfort and amenities. Land-borne liners, perhaps.

"implement UHC and build more hospitals, train more doctors, nurses, technicians, etc."

The United States has not got this problem. It has the problem of having hundreds of thousands of people who make their living by messing with the healthcare system. How about we have lawyers work on questions of criminal law instead of litigation from healthcare systems? Would make the justice system a lost swifter, that's for sure.

And yes, America should make train far more technicians for health care jobs. Canada and Western Europe will need a bunch of them soon, too. Wouldn't that be nice, to be exporting skilled personnel in stuff other than weaponry?

"rebuild our schools,"

That will start when the Department of Education mandates far higher standards of building maintenance, teacher education, new textbooks, better libraries and better support systems for the system. I haven't forgotten that Washington DC delayed the opening of its schools in 1997 because a third of there were structurally unsafe. That needs to be fixed.

"start building green power generation infrastructure such as windmills, solar panels, geothermal equipment, etc."

Problem here is viability. Those systems do not work all of the time, which means they need fossil fuel backups. Better but far from ideal. I believe the better idea for that is to work with the Canadians and build hundreds of hydroelectric projects across the Canadian North and parts of the Rockies and Great Plains. Hell, if there is a place to do it safely, try damming the Mississippi. That would make sure it never flooded again, wouldn't it?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. On top of the windmills and solar panels...
Power grid infrastructure is important. Specifically, we need that smart power grid that can divert power from halfway across the country, so windmills that are turning in a windy area could be providing power to other areas. Build a certain amount of energy storage as well, so when the windmills and solar panels are generating a surplus, that surplus energy can be stored - that will make it so we don't have to burn so much coal to keep the lights on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StreetKnowledge Donating Member (921 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I agree fully
And especially considering how a screwup in Ohio in 2003 tossed 50 million people in eight states and Ontario into darkness, I would wholeheartedly agree.

Eisenhower said it as well. National Security is not just people with guns, it is also infrastructure and systems that can support any eventuality in an emergency. Too bad the Republicans never thought of that. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fovea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
9. with domestic content requirements
universal healthcare would be one important Keynesian tool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC