Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Henry Paulson is buying $10 billion of Goldman Sachs preferred stock with public money.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 09:19 PM
Original message
Henry Paulson is buying $10 billion of Goldman Sachs preferred stock with public money.
Henry Paulson was the CEO of Goldman Sachs when he was appointed Treasury Secretary in 2006.

Dick Cheney was CEO of Halliburton when he became Vice President in 2001. Cheney got Halliburton no-bid contracts for the Iraq War.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122390023840728367.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Fran Kubelik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. oh
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. Can someone explain how buying billions of $$ of GS will unfreeze credit markets?
Edited on Mon Oct-13-08 09:23 PM by brentspeak
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucky Luciano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Based on the plan, it is quite clear that GS
was a natural choice for one of the nine banks which received an investment. With the investment, GS's counterparties will be able to trust them. GS is extremely dependent on short term funding and is a brilliantly run firm as long as they always have access to short term funding. However, the BK of Lehman killed confidence and nobody wanted to lend to anyone no matter how short the term...well that will put good companies out of busines real fucking quick.

Look into it more if you wish...but I do not feel like typing much more (Exhausted). If it is any consolation, then the senior execs at GS will have their compensation restricted while the government is invested.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Goldman Sachs is "brilliantly run," and yet...
...the private sector is unable to see that. But once they get $10 billion in public money, the private sector will see that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gravity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. They are giving GS equity
The government buys a $10 billion equity stake, and GS has $10 billion in cash from the government. The downside is that it will dilute current shareholders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whoa_Nelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. And this benefits OUR money how?
and where will this preferred stock go? To banks? To CEO pockets? To Paulson himself?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucky Luciano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. no - is is property of the US Government (ie the taxpayer)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. If putting social security money in stocks was a bad idea
why in the hell does anybody want to do it with tax dollars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-08 05:16 AM
Response to Reply #4
19. If the boys can't steal the Social Security Trust Fund
then Hank will make sure they get our money anyway. The net result is the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gravity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. As a Goldman Sachs shareholder, I am not too happy
This dilutes the shares of the company, so it isn't much of a win.

It is a good deal for the government, depending on the terms they can get for the preferred shares.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucky Luciano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. bingo...a necessary evil for Goldie because the alternative would
have crushed them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
11. repukes are the kings (and queens) of political corruption
and cronyism.

IT REEKS.

WE NEED A BIG, HARSH DOSE OF JUSTICE IN THIS COUNTRY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
12. So when is GS going to have their California style spa party a la AIG? Do they get to spend more
than AIG?

I have yet to hear any guarantee that we own that investment. Where are the papers? Or did George explain it all today and provide document numbers and titles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. The stock purchase hasn't taken place yet, but is expected soon. NT
NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
14. Money? Bernake says money is like Dorritos, don't worry we'll make more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
specimenfred1984 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
15. That way healthcare remains unaffordable, isn't that great?
Plenty of money to prop up criminal "investment" banks and to torture innocents in an illegal war but no money for any of that "Socialist" health care, not in this "free" market economy where the government buys failing elitist companies and let's millions suffer!

Hope that clears it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
16. Paulson plays favorites: He helps Goldman-Sachs and let's their competitor, Lehamn collapse.
And he's letting Morgan Stanley hang by the vine.

The cronyism is criminal and blatant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-08 05:09 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. And OBVIOUS!
;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2Design Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-08 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
17. must be the start of moving ss over to stocks n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC