Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anthrax "Emergency" Powers Declared by DHHS

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-08 02:49 PM
Original message
Anthrax "Emergency" Powers Declared by DHHS
Edited on Tue Oct-07-08 02:54 PM by seemslikeadream
http://www.urbansurvival.com/week.htm

Anthrax "Emergency" Powers Declared by DHHS

This was read into the Federal Register Monday. Think about the timing for a minute and then read details:

http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/E8-23547.htm

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Declaration pursuant to section 319F-3 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 247d-6d) to provide targeted liability protections for anthrax countermeasures based on a credible risk that the threat of exposure to Bacillus anthracis and the resulting disease constitutes a public health emergency.

DATES: This notice and the attached declaration are effective as of the date of signature of the declaration.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: RADM W.C. Vanderwagen, Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response, Office of the Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services, 200 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20201, Telephone (202) 205-2882 (this is not a toll-free number).

HHS Secretary's Declaration for Utilization of Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act for Anthrax Countermeasures (emphasis added - G)

Whereas significant changes in the nature, regularity and degree of threats to health posed by the use of infectious agents as weapons of biological warfare have generated increased concern for the safety of the general American population particularly following the deliberate exposure of citizens in the

<[Page 58240>]

United States to Bacillus anthracis (B. anthracis) spores in 2001 that demonstrated the ease of dissemination, infectivity, and mortality; Whereas the Secretary of Homeland Security has determined that B. anthracis and multi-drug-resistant B. anthracis present a material threat against the United States population, sufficient to affect national security; Whereas there are covered countermeasures to treat, identify, or prevent adverse health consequences or death from exposure to B. anthracis; Whereas such countermeasures, including vaccines, antimicrobials/ antibiotics, and antitoxins for pre-exposure and post-exposure prevention and treatment, diagnostics to identify such exposure, and additional countermeasures for treatment of adverse events arising from use of these countermeasures exist or may be the subject of research and/or development; Whereas such countermeasures may be used and administered in accordance with Federal contracts, cooperative agreements, grants, interagency agreements, and memoranda of understanding, and may also be used and administered at the Regional, State, and local level in accordance with the public health and medical response of the Authority Having Jurisdiction; Whereas, the possibility of governmental program planners obtaining stockpiles from private sector entities except through voluntary means such as commercial sale, donation, or deployment would undermine national preparedness efforts and should be discouraged as provided for in section 319F-3(b)(2)(E) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 247d-6d(b)) (``the Act''); Whereas, immunity under section 319F-3(a) of the Act should be available to governmental program planners for distributions of Covered Countermeasures obtained voluntarily, such as by (1) Donation; (2) commercial sale; (3) deployment of Covered Countermeasures from Federal stockpiles; or (4) deployment of donated, purchased, or otherwise voluntarily obtained Covered Countermeasures from State, local, or private stockpiles; Whereas, the extent of immunity under section 319F-3(a) of the Act afforded to a governmental program planner that obtains covered countermeasures except through voluntary means is not intended to affect the extent of immunity afforded other covered persons with respect to such covered countermeasures. Whereas, in accordance with section 319F-3(b)(6) of the Act, I have considered the desirability of encouraging the design, development, clinical testing or investigation, manufacturing, labeling, distribution, formulation, packaging, marketing, promotion, sale, purchase, donation, dispensing, prescribing, administration, licensing, and use of such countermeasures with respect to the category of disease and population described in sections II and IV below, and have found it desirable to encourage such activities for the covered countermeasures; and Whereas, to encourage the design, development, clinical testing or investigation, manufacturing and product formulation, labeling, distribution, packaging, marketing, promotion, sale, purchase, donation, dispensing, prescribing, administration, licensing, and use of medical countermeasures with respect to the category of disease and population described in sections II and IV below, it is advisable, in accordance with section 319F-3(a) and (b) of the Act, to provide immunity from liability for covered persons, as that term is defined at section 319F-3(i)(2) of the Act, and to include as such covered persons such other qualified persons as I have identified in section VI of this declaration; Therefore, pursuant to section 319F-3(b) of the Act, I have determined there is a credible risk that the threat of exposure of B. anthracis and the resulting disease constitutes a public health emergency.


More: http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/E8-23547.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
silverweb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-08 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. Buckle up, people.
We may be in for a bumpy ride.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louis-t Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-08 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. Ohhhhh, October surprise will be anthrax.
So much legal babble., but I'm sure there is a provision in there to cancel any elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chimichurri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-08 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. The timing is odd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadrasT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-08 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. Now hold on one freaking minute.
I cannot watch the DOW crash and digest this simultaneously... shit... putting on my multitasking tinfoil hat...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lutherj Donating Member (788 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-08 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
5. Luckily, we have that army brigade re-deployed to homeland security
for just such an emergency. Damn, those guys are on the ball!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-08 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Clearly psychic in a way they weren't before Katrina. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ITsec Donating Member (477 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-08 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
6. Time for a false flag attack...
Just in time for the elections.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_flag
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4 t 4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-08 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Why EMERGENCY?
shouldn't thay have to back that up with Something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dana_b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-08 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. right - like some sort of threat? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ITsec Donating Member (477 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-08 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Because they know it will happen soon.
It's most likely already planned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-08 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
8. So, Amerithrax is not closed after all?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-08 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
10. Here at Half Past Human we forecast the future.
Edited on Tue Oct-07-08 03:24 PM by seemslikeadream
http://www.halfpasthuman.com/NuHPHWhatWeDo.htm

We are not alone in forecasting the future, all humans do it to some degree. Just a quick search of the internet will provide dozens of forms of future forecasting. Some use astrology, some use other methods.

We employ a technique based on radical linguistics to reduce extracts from readings of dynamic postings on the internet into an archetypical database. With this database of archtypical language, we calculate the rate of change of the language. The forecasts of the future are derived from these calculations. Our calculations are based on a system of associations between words and numeric values for emotional responses from those words. These 'emotional impact indicators' are also of our own devising. They are attached to a data base of over 300/three hundred thousand words. This data base of linked words/phrases and emotions is our lexicon from which the future forecasting is derived.

We call our future viewing the ALTA reports for 'asymetric language trend analysis'. The ALTA reports are available by subscription



............


I have a youtube interview pm me if you want the link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-08 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
13. Here is link to related less confusing information
Sounds to me they are saying they want to implement plan to have mail carriers deliver anthrax vaccine
to residents...
Ha ! I watched Close Encounters...can't fool me.

Anyhow, if someone could check out this liniked story and translate, I would appreciate it.
Most of the good info is towards to the bottom of page.

http://www.pharmacychoice.com/News/article.cfm?Article_ID=125469
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-08 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
14. My bet is a Anthrax attack
Edited on Tue Oct-07-08 05:07 PM by lovuian
its coming
K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-08 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
15. Wow, they're throwing everything plus the kitchen sink at this election
bin Laden surfaces once again, vague warnings of terrorist attacks on government buildings, and now this.

The smell of Repub desperation is really starting to stink the place up now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-08 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
16. No elections, then...
Too many people coming into contact with one another. Wearing their anthrax-y coats in the elementary school gymnasiums.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-08 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
17. Analysis: Fear of terror worsens attacks
Hmmmm... This came up as the only Google "news" item under the search "anthrax credible threat."

Analysis: Fear of terror worsens attacks

By SHAUN WATERMAN (UPI Homeland and National Security Editor)Published: September 22, 2008
Print Story

WASHINGTON, Sept. 22 (UPI) -- The number of people suffering psychologically induced symptoms could far outweigh the number of actual victims in a chemical, biological or nuclear incident, according to a confidential Department of Homeland Security briefing document.

"Mass psychogenic illness" can "spread rapidly throughout a population," says the briefing, citing incidents in California in 2003 and Chechnya in 2005.

The briefing, prepared in 2006 but only leaked last week, defines mass psychogenic illness as "a phenomenon in which social trauma or anxiety combines with a suspicious event to produce psychosomatic symptoms, such as nausea, difficulty breathing, and paralysis."

In October 2003, the briefing says, bank customers and staff in California became ill, with symptoms including "headache, fever, faintness, and numbness in extremities" after a man sprayed an aerosol can into the air -- "although subsequent investigation determined that no chemical or biological agents were present." "Observed symptoms might have been psychosomatic," the paper quotes investigators as concluding.

The document, posted last week by Wikileaks.org, highlights the fact that officials' public statements during chemical or biological events such as a suspected terrorist attack can easily make matters worse -- and that their ability to make them better is crucially reliant on a credibility with the public that many fear is eroding.

George Foresman, the Homeland Security undersecretary for preparedness until last year, questioned whether "the average citizen" would "trust what the government tells them about the likelihood that they've been exposed or not been exposed to a certain pathogen or a chemical."

<snip>

http://www.metimes.com/Security/2008/09/22/analysis_fear_of_terror_worsens_attacks/5f1e/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-08 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Thank you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC