Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Something about the Gonzales scandal that has me wondering

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
whosinpower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 09:59 AM
Original message
Something about the Gonzales scandal that has me wondering
Breaking it down -

US Attorneys are hired and fired by the president.
Gonzales made this happen and in such a way that new attorneys could be appointed without the normal vetting process--am I correct so far?

The uproar right now is that the attorneys that were fired, were not performing to the level of republican asskissing that was required. Is this correct? Even though they recieved stellar reviews of their work.

Gonzales is under fire for lying about it.

But I am wondering why the president is not under fire? These attorneys are hired and FIRED by the president. Bush stated this emphatically. They serve under his pleasure. So, I am wondering why Gonzales is facing all the heat, when the real issue is that these attorneys were not performing to Bush standards....and I am also wondering how it is that he can get away with stating not knowing any details or reasons why they were fired. HE HIRES THEM AND FIRES THEM AS HE SEES FIT! He stated as much- and yet he has no clue why they were fired--only that he has confidence in Gonzales and is upset with how Gonzales explained the situation to Congress.

Can someone explain this to me?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. I had to chuckle earlier in the week
when bush lackey dan bartlett said bush had nothing to do with the firings BUT HE APPROVED THEM. The only explanation I might offer is that gonzalez is just the latest firewall protecting the number one criminal in the country. I am optimistic bush will meet face to face with justice before he has a chance to fly off to his property in Paraguay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Interesting question: what if a standing US president is out of the country, is charged and refuses
to reenter the country?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. To compund the interest
Paraguay does not have an extradition treaty with the U. S.. bush is making plans for his post presidency. He can hide from the truth the rest of his miserable life. No doubt he'll have fake barns and fake cows and fake brush on his fake "ranch."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Immediate impeachment and removal from office...
and the V.P. would assume duties? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. A sitting president can not be charged
He can, however, be impeached by the House (ie have indictments brought against him) and removed from office by the Senate (ie convicted and sentenced under those indictments.)

If a sitting president refuses to return to the United States, I believe Congress has the power to impeach him for dereliction of duty. It is possible that it could be done without impeachment if Congress decides that his abandoning his office has made him unfit for duty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. thanks, that's what I was thinking
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #4
12. Yeah, can you imagine repossessing Air Force One?
I can see it now:

"Hey, Mac! Get yourself down to Paraguay and get Air Force One back here. That SOB Bush took it down there and isn't coming back, so you need to do the job. Here are the keys..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Thanx for posting
"bush had nothing to do with the firings BUT HE APPROVED THEM."

This like the Scooter Libby case goes right into the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #1
15. The papier mache pretensions of 'approval' and 'responsibility' are laughable.
Abu Gonzo declares he's 'responsible' (with a stiff upper lip) and then, in essence, acknowledges he's not acted responsibly in any sense whatsoever. It's totally laughable that ANY Chief of Staff (including Libby!) would act without the full knowledge and complicity of the principal. There can be no more closely-coordinated subordinate than a Chief of Staff.

But abu Gonzo struts and postures and, like a 7-year-old wearing her mother's shoes and furs, claims to "take responsibility" in the same breath he runs from it like a vampire from garlic.

Same with DimSon ... posturing like a "loyal and supportive" boss and vacuously declaring 'approval' for something which, in the very same breath, he denies knowledge of.

It'd be comedy if it were funny, but it's not. These people MUST be jailed for life. Or longer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hippiechick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
2. Because Alberto is another fall guy for Blivet ...
... just like Scooter is the fall guy for Darth Cheney in Plamegate.

They never ever never ever take responsibility for their own actions, they hire old cronies who are extremely well-paid to do it for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalEsto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
3. One step at a time.
First Gonzo, then Dubya.

And if enough legal pressure is brought to bear on Gonzo, it's possible that he will break and sing like a birdie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
5. Gonzales is the one who lied before Congress..
when he said it wasn't political, when clearly it was.

They also tried to pin it on Harriet Miers, they said that it was her who came up with the scheme in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
9. US Attorneys serve at the pleasure of the president, they don't serve the president's pleasure
To be free to do the job of US Attorneys they must have the latitude to investigate probable criminal wrong doing...even when the wrong doing is done by members or officials of the President's political party.

Gonzales is just like Bush in as much as both are in over their heads. Being out of their depth they rely on "loyalty" and trust facilitators like Rove and Cheney to guide them. Unfortunately, Rove and Cheney are two of the most partisan personalities to ever serve in the WH.

No one blames Bush because they know he isn't the one making the decisions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stanwyck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
10. Bush never knows the details
Karl tells him what needs to happen. He agrees. But as we've seen in the past six years, Bush is totally unaware of the specifics in every situation. He just doesn't care that much. He's not intellectually curious. He doesn't want to do the homework. He concentrates on the main ideology (get rid of attorneys who don't support his administration) and that's it.
Yes. The devil is in the details. But, sometimes the devil lets the henchmen do the work while he clears brush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
14. Because when anyone finds themselves suddenly in the employ of the moron*
They are hit with a mind altering laser which causes a blank spot in their brain. They really want to say morons* name but they are physically unable to.

It would go something like this:

Senator #1: so Mr. Abu Gonzalez, from whom did you get the order from to fire these attorneys?

Abu: that would be my boss...

Senator #1: and that would be?

Abu: the pre...the pre..

Senator #2: excuse me? are you having trouble?

Abu: pre...pre...pre...

Senator #2: someone get Abu a glass of water

Abu gulps down the water.

Abu: sorry I don't know what happened I sort of blacked out.

Senator #3: okay, what is your boss's name?

Abu: B...B...B...BBBBBBBBBB.....

Senator #3: get a grip man, what is wrong with you? Just say his name!

Abu: BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.....

Ten years later, in a home for the criminally insane...

Orderly: There there mr Abu, it's all good. now lets roll you over to the nice window and have a look at the beautiful day.

Abu: BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB...

Orderly: see, there are nice birdies, and beautiful trees, lush green grass and someone is putting in a wonderful new BUSH...

Abu screams out in pain, grabs his head and faints dead away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
solara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
16. Excellent question
I was wondering the same thing myself during Alberto's "press conference" I believe the statement "I serve at the President's pleasure" means that there is nothing he does that isn't discussed and allowed by the President. In otherwords, he is the President's man, his SERVANT, sort of like the relationship between Renfield and Count Dracula.

No doubt the Count is upset with Renfield's often repeated "hint" that he doesn't do anything without the oversight and approval of his Master. :eyes:


INVESTIGATE IMPEACH INDICT INCARCERATE :patriot:



:kick: k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
17. The buck never ever ever ever stops at the Bush* whitehouse
He has never done anything wrong in his entire life, just ask him...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InkAddict Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. Management style - He's a delegator and
gave this task over to Rove, Meiers, Gonzolez, et. al.

"Now don't bother me with the details and watch this drive!" Even Kenny Boy claimed he didn't know the details!

Let those cute little Raptors descend and make feast on the green! It's Buzzard Day!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC